Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

my Mk is better than my GQ :(

Tech Talk for Nissan owners.

Moderators: toaddog, V8Patrol

Post Reply
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2003 10:22 pm
Location: Stanthorpe- QLD

my Mk is better than my GQ :(

Post by Snarba »

Hmmmm after waiting years and drooling over GQ's I've finally been able to afford one ( 90 model LWB Diesel) but I must say my old Turbo SD33 with a 2.5 inch exhaust pisses all over it....I'm very sad :cry: The GQ is heaps more comfortable and looks better but is an absolute slug on the road, turns like a f'n barge and uses more fuel. I'm half tempted to sell it and try the 3.0litre Turbo instead....whats the point of having a more reliable motor if it's a pain in the arse to drive? I don't know what to do anymore......obviously a turbo would make all the diff but at $ 4000 ish I'll be saving another couple of years and I could afford a whole SD33T MK for that price :x I know I'm just having a whinge but I've been after one of these for about 5 years......poo
I've got a WEAPON OF MOSS DETRUCTION
Posts: 3385
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 8:26 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by shakes »

whinge whinge f&kn whinge :finger:

Have you serviced it fully ? Got the fuel pump cleaned out and slightly tweaked ? cleaned the fuel tank out ?

I remember mine being a slug but not as bad as your making out :roll: .

if you have some mechanical skill's you can do the turbo ALOT cheaper than the said 4k.... have a good search around here lots of info, there's often kit's going for 1-2k from bloke's parting out their rig's.
Posts: 300
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 2:22 am
Location: Toowoomba QLD

Post by 90Mav »

Mate, I just drove 2500k's in 3 days in my 4.2 gq. Cant say it needed more power... (just softer springs)

Remember it is a truck, with a truck motor, and drive accordingly.
Thrashed '90 Leaf spring Maverick ute, TD42, 2" EFS lift. 36 Swampers.
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 4:32 am
Location: Jamaica/(Haiti)

Post by Lawrence »

I agree that it could be the pump. When I had my mk ute with a na sd 33, I had some pump work done. Performance after was like night and day. I couldnt believe it afterwards!
89 gq dx. bone stock --- for now.
Posts: 368
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:06 am
Location: scotland

Post by lexi »

You know what they say mate.........Sometimes it`s better to travel hopefully than arrive :lol:

Alex
Posts: 2072
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:50 pm
Location: Hobart

Post by macca81 »

90Mav wrote: Remember it is a truck, with a truck motor, and drive accordingly.

his comparison vehicle is an MQ, i rekon he knows all about driving a truck with a truck motor....







on that note, a truck will always sh1t it in over a car! stick with the MQ :P hehe
[quote="Barnsey"]
Bronwyn Bishop does it for me.[/quote]
Posts: 2056
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 6:17 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Big Red Toy »

Its your motor!

I must say i did test drive a naturally aspirated diesel Gq when i was looking at them & it went quite well :lol:

But if all else fails, sell the Mq & put the money towards a turbo kit for the gq :cool:
Style Side Maverick Ute
4.2 Turbo Diesel
35" Simex
4" Procomp suspension
2" Bodylift
Fibreglass Stuff....
Now highmount & Plasma :d
Posts: 3523
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 12:27 am
Location: Fairfield,Sydney

Post by pongo »

Big Red Toy wrote:Its your motor!

I must say i did test drive a naturally aspirated diesel Gq when i was looking at them & it went quite well :lol:

But if all else fails, sell the Mq & put the money towards a turbo kit for the gq :cool:
My swb t/d mk dragged of my cousins gq with n/a with only 180k on it and i was towing a heavy car trailer with a box trailer on it. He was empty.

and that was before 4.6 gears and a 3inch exhaust and heaps of psi.


Glad to hear that the old sd33 still kick ass
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 6:56 pm
Location: sydney

Post by go piggen »

mk's kick arse mate unfukenbreakable piss the gq off. even though your brain bounces around your skull with the leaf springs
Posts: 898
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 6:16 pm
Location: Melb S/E

Post by NutterGQ »

I think this will stop the argument lol

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwnpV7Olzjo
My bitch has boost, Nutter Engineering Turbo GQ
Posts: 2877
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:46 pm
Location: Goodna QLD

Post by ludacris »

The real test between the both will be of road.

LudaCris
Cris's 4 X 4 Accessories & Suspension 0404 736 325 Rock Sliders From $499
Posts: 2877
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:46 pm
Location: Goodna QLD

Post by ludacris »

Also if you like I will swap you a MQ 2.8 pety with a GQ SHELL on it for your GQ patrol. Only trying to help you. :roll: :lol:

LudaCris
Cris's 4 X 4 Accessories & Suspension 0404 736 325 Rock Sliders From $499
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 4:32 am
Location: Jamaica/(Haiti)

Post by Lawrence »

I have never driven the sd33t, but I know the hp and torque figures are similar to the TD42, with the gq having a bit more. I suspect though that the sd33t in an swb could have a power to weight advantage over the gq, not to mention lower ratio diffs
89 gq dx. bone stock --- for now.
Posts: 464
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:50 pm
Location: the bush

Post by troll85 »

my turbo mq is a bit of a slug but it whips arse off road lol keep the mk :armsup:
Posts: 848
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 12:01 pm
Location: Central Victoria

Post by Patroler »

Yea there are a few thing i prefer about the mk to the gq - (mk Swb na sd33 & Gq Lwb na td42) on road i prefer the gq everywhere (except turning circle but not fair to compare a lwb and swb) off road the mk has a better crawl ratio, no drivetrain backlash down at low revs 500 - 1000 (mk has 300000k and gq has 140000k) and i hate the way you have to push the gq transfer lever down to get to n and 4L - finicky i know but the mk just pulls back smooth as silk.
Performance, isn't a huge difference the gq goes a bit better, the mk with a turbo would top it.
Once i get a turbo for the gq and maybe some crawler gears i'm sure i'll be well and truly over mk's
There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 4:32 am
Location: Jamaica/(Haiti)

Post by Lawrence »

I have not had a chance to take the gq off road yet, but I will admit that my old mk ute had a awesome crawl ratio for a stock 4by. it was about 45 to one. Sometimes had to give a little gas going down some hills. I guess a 4.875 to one axle ratio helped a lot plus plus the mks had a lower range transfer case than the gqs
89 gq dx. bone stock --- for now.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 130 guests