Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

exhaust muffler standard /OEM size

Tech Talk for Ford, Mazda, Daihatsu & Makes that currently dont have a home.

Moderator: Tiny

Post Reply
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 5:12 pm
Location: Metro Manila, Philippines

exhaust muffler standard /OEM size

Post by F300tazmanian »

Is it 1.5"? I plan to bring back the standard size and remove the 2" exhaust after the muffler going to the rearmost tip.
[img]http://photos-a.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs460.snc3/26274_373741626392_689111392_5323214_6501185_s.jpg[/img]
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 7:58 am
Location: Whangarei NZ

Post by meece4x4 »

mines 45mm internal dia and the pipe is stock, only thing i have done to mine is remove the cat convertor and factory muffler and replace them with coby's
just curous to why you are returning to stock size ..these motor really benifit from a free flow exhuast system.

cheers meece in NZ
_________________
1988 LWB ,IFS, LSD, POS, PAJ, 31" M/T's on bling rims, Snorkel, 2" Lift ,new shocks ,XD9000 winch
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 5:12 pm
Location: Metro Manila, Philippines

Post by F300tazmanian »

meece4x4 wrote:mines 45mm internal dia and the pipe is stock, only thing i have done to mine is remove the cat convertor and factory muffler and replace them with coby's
just curous to why you are returning to stock size ..these motor really benifit from a free flow exhuast system.

cheers meece in NZ
Thank you for your reply sir! :) So 45mm is almost equivalent to 1.5" or exact 1.75" or 1 3/4". Our motor here in the Philippines is the HD-C 16valve, the OEM sizes gives good more power and torque backpressure in my experience. Whether using it offroad or onroad. :)
[img]http://photos-a.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs460.snc3/26274_373741626392_689111392_5323214_6501185_s.jpg[/img]
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 1:53 pm
Location: New Zealand

Post by Tansy »

I also found the factory fitted muffler provided much better torque/power and fuel economy than the standard generic replacement fitted by exhaust shops here in NZ to my Feroza and petrol Rockies. (Ok...I'm greedy) A solution was to insert and weld a restrictor ring in the tail pipe at the 'outlet'.
Worked a treat, regained low end and hill climbing (motorway performance), plus economy. Couldn't believe that a woman needed to suggest it to Magoo Mufflers. DUH!
Posts: 2297
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:23 pm
Location: Melbourne-Australia

Post by MightyMouse »

Tansy - I'm impressed, many guys wouldn't even understand the what's and whys - well done.

On the other side, a better air cleaner system, extractors and a better exhaust, particularly with a modified cam ( cam advance ) also kick things along.
( usual disclaimers )

It seemed like a much better idea when I started it than it does now.
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 5:12 pm
Location: Metro Manila, Philippines

Post by F300tazmanian »

Tansy wrote:I also found the factory fitted muffler provided much better torque/power and fuel economy than the standard generic replacement fitted by exhaust shops here in NZ to my Feroza and petrol Rockies. (Ok...I'm greedy) A solution was to insert and weld a restrictor ring in the tail pipe at the 'outlet'.
Worked a treat, regained low end and hill climbing (motorway performance), plus economy. Couldn't believe that a woman needed to suggest it to Magoo Mufflers. DUH!
Thats why I really wanted to put it back. So is it 1.5" or 1.75"? Do you have pics of your Feroza muffler?
[img]http://photos-a.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs460.snc3/26274_373741626392_689111392_5323214_6501185_s.jpg[/img]
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 7:58 am
Location: Whangarei NZ

Post by meece4x4 »

MightyMouse wrote:Tansy - I'm impressed, many guys wouldn't even understand the what's and whys - well done.

On the other side, a better air cleaner system, extractors and a better exhaust, particularly with a modified cam ( cam advance ) also kick things along.
mine must be an oddball then .... stock manifold..stock pipe size but no cat convertor and freeflow cobys instead of factory muffler, I return a fuel ecconomy of around 11 litres per 160km and prob have 20-30% more power over the original setup.

with standard muffler setup and cat convertor i was using 17 litres per 160 km

this is a known benchmark for me as i drive this distance every day. too early in the morning to work out the ratio of litres per 100km :lol:

For Tansy's benefit that means it costs me less than $20 to drive from Whangarei to Auckland :D (164KM)
_________________
1988 LWB ,IFS, LSD, POS, PAJ, 31" M/T's on bling rims, Snorkel, 2" Lift ,new shocks ,XD9000 winch
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests