Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Head differences 1.3's

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Post Reply
Posts: 3940
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 1:09 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast Qld

Head differences 1.3's

Post by want33s »

I'm building a 1.6 block and have a choice of two 1.3 heads to use. One is off a 1298cm3.. the other is off a 1324cm3.
They look the same to me. Can anyone tell me if there are any differences and if so which would be better to use on a 1.6(8V) block?
Jas.
Posts: 918
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:46 am
Location: Western Brisbane

Post by Highway-Star »

I think the difference is in the pistons of the two different engines. Ones a dome piston ones flat top...

I do know that coily heads have a different timing pulley, because my WT is running a coily head, both engines were 1298cc, but the WT is square tooth timing, and the coily is rounded. The pulleys are a straight swap.
Wheeling on completely wicked angles, without even looking stable.
Posts: 211
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:19 pm
Location: brisbane

Post by suzimad »

The cylinder heads are identical , it doesnt matter which one you use.

The difference between a 1298cc and 1324cc is in the crank , the pistons are identical in both engines (except gti which has 4 flycuts), the crank on the 1298cc engine has a stroke of 2.97 inches and a bore of 74 mm , the 1324 has a 3.03 inch stroke and a 74mm bore. You can visually identify the different cranks by the snout that the crank sprocket fits onto.

Regarding the cylinder head , there is no difference in flow in either the one off the 1324 or the 1298 BUT , iirc , there was a slight difference in the way a particular head was cast that was marked "S3" that made it a better head for extreme port work . There was also a slight difference in the length of the cam follower on the rockers , but this is trivial as the extra surface area is never used on the longer follower.

If you are interested i have a reprofiled camshaft (dont ask me the specs , but i believe it has an extra 1mm lift , i havent measured it yet ) also a set of chromed rocker cover , water pump pulley and crank pulley for sale for $200 the lot.
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Perth

Post by scooby_74 »

1324 or 1298 heads much the same
1324 and 1298 have different cranks and the piston pin hight is different.
if the vehicle is used for off road use keep with the standard 1.3 cam better bottom end.
Use the vitara 8 valve cam belt and sprockets. it gets too messy using the efi belts and gears when it comes to lining up alternators and waterpump pully.
93 NJ,5 speed,2" body lift,32" muddies

There's nuttn like momentum
User avatar
NIK
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:13 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by NIK »

There is a thread on pirate atm about head specs more to do with 1600 vs 1300 but may have some good info.
Nik
Posts: 211
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:19 pm
Location: brisbane

Post by suzimad »

scooby_74 wrote:1324 or 1298 heads much the same
1324 and 1298 have different cranks and the piston pin hight is different.
if the vehicle is used for off road use keep with the standard 1.3 cam better bottom end.
Use the vitara 8 valve cam belt and sprockets. it gets too messy using the efi belts and gears when it comes to lining up alternators and waterpump pully.
But all single overhead cam 1.3 engines list the same piston part number regardless , also cams can be reprofiled to make power at various places in the rev range , its like on the twin cam engines with vernier timing gears , you can increase or decrease valve overlap to make your power at different places of the rev range , but with a single cam you dont have that luxury , so reprofiling the cam can be done to make power in low , mid , or top end of the rev range.

I do agree with you about using the 1.6 8 valve timing sprockets though making life easier.
Posts: 3940
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 1:09 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast Qld

Post by want33s »

Thanks guys for all the replies. :D
I'll be getting started soon. I'll let everyone know how it turns out.
1.6 block. .... 1.3 head. .... TBI. ... Woohoo. :D
Posts: 1213
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:25 pm
Location: SE Melbourne

Post by dank »

why don't you go a GTI DOHC head with injection? Have you read this article on autospeed?

http://www.autospeed.com.au/cms/article ... A=0004&P=1

not a huge amount of info there but in theory it sounds good....
Work - KPD4X4.COM - KPD Industries Australian Distributor of Diesel Power Modules - Germany.
Play - dank's zook
Posts: 3940
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 1:09 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast Qld

Post by want33s »

dank wrote:why don't you go a GTI DOHC head with injection? Have you read this article on autospeed?

http://www.autospeed.com.au/cms/article ... A=0004&P=1

not a huge amount of info there but in theory it sounds good....
I'm using the 1.6-1.3- TBI combo cause thats what I have. :D
I got a running 1.3 with gearbox and TBI incl ECM and laptop for $400.
I got a 1.6 bottom end for $100.
DOHC is just more money, I don't think the Zook needs it.
A brand new 1.3 would probably do me but I found a 1.6 bottom end at the right price so thats what I'm using just for that bit more torque.
Posts: 713
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2002 2:12 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by Hybrid »

want33s wrote:
dank wrote:why don't you go a GTI DOHC head with injection? Have you read this article on autospeed?

http://www.autospeed.com.au/cms/article ... A=0004&P=1

not a huge amount of info there but in theory it sounds good....
I'm using the 1.6-1.3- TBI combo cause thats what I have. :D
I got a running 1.3 with gearbox and TBI incl ECM and laptop for $400.
I got a 1.6 bottom end for $100.
DOHC is just more money, I don't think the Zook needs it.
A brand new 1.3 would probably do me but I found a 1.6 bottom end at the right price so thats what I'm using just for that bit more torque.
I'm doing the same thing. 1.3 head on a rebuilt 1.6MPFI bottom end using the 1.6 TBI and a megasquirt. Problem is finding the TBI and inlet manifold. I can get a GTI motor cheaply and easily. Any idea if the GTI MPFI head + 1.6 bottom end will be too high and need a body lift? (like the 1.6MPFI conversions require) I'm kind of hoping the 1.3MPFI head is shorter than the 1.6MPFI.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest