Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Q78 super swampers VS simex 35 10.5 16

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Post Reply
Posts: 1285
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 8:22 pm
Location: gold coast

Q78 super swampers VS simex 35 10.5 16

Post by uninformed »

hey all, looking at these 2 tyres,

or any tall NARROW tyre,

must be 16 inch..

my question is if these 2 tyres were mounted on a 7 inch rim what is the actual dia/height and width at its widest, cross section???

cheers, serg
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: Lara Victoria

Post by Ruffy »

I'll measure my Q78's tomorrow. They're mounted on 16X7's.
Q78's are taller than 35" simex's and tougher. Simex's are better in sloppy mud, Q78's are better on rock and rutted terrain. Slippery stuff i reckon they're on a par.
[quote="Uhhohh"]As far as an indecent proposal goes, I'd accept nothing less than $100,000 to tolerate buggery. Any less and it's just not worth the psychological trauma. [/quote]
Posts: 1285
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 8:22 pm
Location: gold coast

Post by uninformed »

cheers mate, this is the sort of feed back i want to here

also how are they both on high way/road driving?

not going to have them on all he time of coarse...... but how do they go?

serg
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri May 23, 2003 1:13 pm
Location: Camperdown Vic

Post by AndrewT »

A Q78 on 16x7 mechanical beadlocks measures at 35.5." tall.
I've had both and prefer the swampers allround.
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: Lara Victoria

Post by Ruffy »

Hmmmm.. On road, simex's all the way.
Swampers are fair pigs when they're cold, they do get better with a bit of temp in them but you cant beat radials on the road.
I'd prefer to put up the swampers on road though for the benefits you get off road.
[quote="Uhhohh"]As far as an indecent proposal goes, I'd accept nothing less than $100,000 to tolerate buggery. Any less and it's just not worth the psychological trauma. [/quote]
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

I reckon the simex's are noisier than swampers too.

I have seen some simexes do some great stuff on clay etc, but I'd never own a set. I've had 4 sets of swampers though and LOVE Q78's.

Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Posts: 1285
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 8:22 pm
Location: gold coast

Post by uninformed »

thanks guys,

im not to concerned about the height but want the narrowest of the 2

so which is narrower on a 7 inch rim?


cheers, serg
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

I'd say the 78, but can't be sure.

PS they will go on a mechanically beadlocked 6" rim too (so effectively 6.5") and they sit very nicely- they look really tall and narrow like that.

Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

Gwagensteve wrote:I'd say the 78, but can't be sure.

PS they will go on a mechanically beadlocked 6" rim too (so effectively 6.5") and they sit very nicely- they look really tall and narrow like that.

Steve.
any photos of them fitted to 6's?
Posts: 766
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 7:16 pm
Location: brisbane

Post by bruiser »

why does everyone refer to them as Q78's. Is that not the load rating or something of the like.
Posts: 1285
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 8:22 pm
Location: gold coast

Post by uninformed »

because thats what they are called, u can get them in 15 or 16 inch rim size...

have a look at interco's web site

serg
Posts: 7230
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 10:42 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by MissDrew »

bruiser wrote:why does everyone refer to them as Q78's. Is that not the load rating or something of the like.
The swamper come like this
35 TSL
Q78 TSL
36 TSL
Don`t know why Interco called them that but that is what they are. Its like everybody is just calling a 35 or 36 TSL swamper a Q78 :roll:
Posts: 1285
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 8:22 pm
Location: gold coast

Post by uninformed »

well im refering to the ones of there (interco's) chart that are called Q78...

there is only 2 available one in 15 inch rim and 1 in 16 inch rim

Prod. Code
Size
Weight
Ply Rating
Sidewall
Ply
Skid Depth
Tread Width
O.D.
C.S.
Rev
Per
Mile
Rim
Max Infla.
Max Load

SAM-52
Q78-15LT
65
6
4
27/32
9.5
35.5
10.8
556
15x6.5-8
40
2750

SAM-53
Q78-16LT
66
6
4
27/32
9.5
35.5
10.8
556
16x6.5-8
40
2580
Posts: 1285
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 8:22 pm
Location: gold coast

Post by uninformed »

ok so those sizes i posted tell me it has a tread width of 9.5 inches or 241mm and a cross section (im guessing thats what c.s. stands for????)
width of 10.8 inches or 275mm

does that sound right?

how much difference to width would mounting them on 6.5 inch rims over a 7 inch rim make???

the simex i saw/measured that were 35 10.5 16 were 10.5 at the tread and 12 or about 305mm at the widest point (cross section)

serg
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests