Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

BFG and Goodyear muddies

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Melbourne

BFG and Goodyear muddies

Post by cody82 »

G'day im finally getting new rubber on my lux and are looking at these 2 brands mainly beacause i've heard good things about them both and more to the point I can get these at a reasonably good price through family. I will run them on the road (yeah I should have 2 sets of tyres but havent got much time to get out in the bush so I cant be shagged changing wheels!) and im just wondering if anybody has had these two tyres and what they though of them off road, on the road and how they wore when on the road. Im assuming the BFG will be noisier but not really fussed.
Any imput would be great
Cody.
Posts: 3132
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 3:22 pm
Location: Newy

Post by HotFourOk »

There is soooooo much info on here about both tyres, and even comparisons of the two.

BFG are known to give good kms, and are fairly good in the mud.

MTR are known to be very good on rocks and on the blacktop, but maybe less kms due to softer compound. (Although some people are getting 70k+)

Any tyre with that much void space will be noisy!

For touring, they are pretty similar, with the MTR having a good reputation for puncture resistant sidewalls.

The Goodyears have been around a while now and have been tested with good reports, and BFG have always been here, and always been good.
[quote="RockyF70 - Coming out of the closet"]i'd be rushing out and buying an IFS rocky[/quote]
Posts: 2480
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 6:42 pm
Location: NSW

Post by r0ck_m0nkey »

BFG MT's are great because they have an unmistakable howl on the road which warns you that the wife is coming up the road and nearly home. :armsup:
If God did not intend for us to eat animals, then why did he make them out of meat?
Posts: 228
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:36 am
Location: Latrobe Valley Victoria

Post by Troopy93 »

HotFourOk wrote:For touring, they are pretty similar, with the MTR having a good reputation for puncture resistant sidewalls.
Not too sure about the MT/R Sidewall Puncture resistence, I have had 3 sidewalls go in 11000km of not too difficult driving.

Luckily I got the Road Hazard warranty with them thru Beaurepaires, only have to pay for the tread usage, cost $66.00 for 3 new tyres so far.

Once they wear out I won't be getting them again.
93 1HZ Troopy Double Locked, Lifted and Gassed with NO Benefits by D-GAS

D-GAS= Dont - Give A Shit
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by cody82 »

Geeze alot people have different views on them, I'd be on the road most of the time so the MTR's may wear a little early for me.. Would just hope the BFG's wouldnt slip and slide on wet roads.

Wifey doesnt drive my 4B but I dont reakon they wouldf it a pulsar without a guard trim..
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by cody82 »

Cooper STT's were another option but again I have heard alot of negative stuff about there sidewalls being very average.
Posts: 1419
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:31 pm
Location: South Bris

Post by micks troll »

I have run both and will never buy either again. I first had the bfg mt's and every time i went off road the sidewall would fill up and leak due to the "so called" rim protector. On road they were ok but i only had them for 2 months and sold them in disgust. The Mtr's i got second hand as a swap for my smaller tyre due to wanting larger rim, tyre combo. They were as noisy as hell handle crap on road (wandered) and were scary in the wet. crap in mud also and worst of all are an undersized tyre (nearly 2" smaller than my swampers and also smaller than my Maxxis roadies). I run 2 sets of tyre, for roadies i was running Toyos and now Maxxis 751's and my play tyres are Swampers I now have the best of both worlds :cool: By the way all these tyres were 33's on 15x8 sunnys except the Toyo's as they were 31's on 15x7 sunnys i swapped for the Mtr's.
Maybe the new BFG KM2's will be nicer and handle better? The Mtr's may be ok for your application but out of the 2 i'd probably rate the bfg's slightly better. Still won't buy either again though :P thats my 5c's
White 92 GQ TD42 LWB (AKA Putt putt)
licorice all sorts added
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 5:40 am
Location: brisbane

Post by deejay181 »

the goodyear wrangler mtr ISNT a mud tyre, so dont buy it xpecting it to be great in the mud....i have seen quite q few ppl use them on rocks and sand and think they are great tho.
Posts: 1711
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 7:19 am
Location: Kalgoorlie WA

Post by roverrat »

coopers for on road stt 315's
We are put on this earth for one thing, and one thing only, to die. What you do in the mean time is entirely up to you!

http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/ftopic52067.php
Posts: 292
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:20 pm
Location: Ipswich

Post by hilux79 »

Goodyear wrangler isn't a mud terrain, MTR stands for maximum traction radial. They sux in the mud. They end up like slicks.
Posts: 1419
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:31 pm
Location: South Bris

Post by micks troll »

hilux79 wrote:Goodyear wrangler isn't a mud terrain, MTR stands for maximum traction radial. They sux in the mud. They end up like slicks.
Maxium traction re-enforced is what it's called forgive my spelling if it's wrong :P In general they suck
White 92 GQ TD42 LWB (AKA Putt putt)
licorice all sorts added
Posts: 292
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:20 pm
Location: Ipswich

Post by hilux79 »

micks troll wrote:
hilux79 wrote:Goodyear wrangler isn't a mud terrain, MTR stands for maximum traction radial. They sux in the mud. They end up like slicks.
Maxium traction re-enforced is what it's called forgive my spelling if it's wrong :P In general they suck
Yeah my bad. Don't know where I got that from.
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by cody82 »

Well this thread has made tyre choosing harder, good to get a view opinions,I guess you cant get it all in 1 tyre, my mainapplication would be loose rocks and muddy trails and hills and on road. From what I have gathered BFG probably suite more I'm temptedto wait till the new MK2 comes in see how that goes..
Posts: 3132
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 3:22 pm
Location: Newy

Post by HotFourOk »

micks troll wrote:The Mtr's i got second hand
You cannot seriously compare a second hand tyre to any new one.

You would have no idea as to how the tyre was treated, how old they were and if they were balanced and/or rotated. That would explain the noise, and the lack of tread would explain your grip concerns, along with the tyre hardening as it aged.
[quote="RockyF70 - Coming out of the closet"]i'd be rushing out and buying an IFS rocky[/quote]
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

I've run MTR's and BFG MT's new and old pattern on my GQ. 33x12.5x15

First thing I bought when I updated to GU was MTR's. 285x75x16.

Have never been let down by them, touring, weekenders, perfect. They are no Simex Centipede, but you realise that and dont get yourself into a situation where you would want a centipede.

As for MTR's sucking in mud, I've never had issues up Toolangi, Ellis, rocky, Mt Dissa, etc...

I've had BFG's turn to slicks just as fast as MTR's and seen many tires turn to slicks in the gluggy tacky mud, same as my old AT's.. ANY basic MT tire will turn to slicks in the wrong shiz.

When these MTR's wear out I'll buy em again.

There are possibly some that I would consider, but are so much more $ than MTR's its not a good financial decision. Best Ive found is $300 for 285's. and anythin upto $345 for em :shock:
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2004 6:50 pm
Location: Perth / Laverton

Post by Zeyphly »

What about some some maxxis treapadors or hankook dynapros rt03 my bro has the maxxis on his ute and loves them.
03 turbo twin cab hilux + 85 xtra cab 253, Have i ever said i love lockers?
Posts: 131
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 11:59 am
Location: Fraser Coast Qld

Post by Tailspin »

I've found the Bfg's to be excellent on road, especially in the wet, and off road I found them to have good traction as well, the only thing that keeps me from using them again on my wagon is the thin 9mm weak side wall that will stake easily, have done two of them, not nice when they still have 75% tread left and not repairable :bad-words: .
I use the old left overs on my work ute now and no problems for on road duties, have 65,000+ k's on them now and still have 5-8 mm tread left :lol:
Have never used MTR's but have mates that swear by them, but seem to have a shorter life.

Hope this helps.
Tailspin.
Fraser Island tour bus drivers suck!!

www.waterfrontrestaurant.info
www.frasercoast4wdclub.com
www.coastal4x4.com.au
1988 GQ 4.2TD, 2002 GU 3.0TD Wagon, 1987 HJ75 Ute.
Posts: 1419
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:31 pm
Location: South Bris

Post by micks troll »

HotFourOk wrote:
micks troll wrote:The Mtr's i got second hand
You cannot seriously compare a second hand tyre to any new one.

You would have no idea as to how the tyre was treated, how old they were and if they were balanced and/or rotated. That would explain the noise, and the lack of tread would explain your grip concerns, along with the tyre hardening as it aged.

I guess some of this is true but i had Swampers that were over 8 years (yes this is correct) old and nearly bald they handled better than even the MTR's on road (apart from flat spotting when cold, taken 10 mins to warm up) and the MTRs sucked even worse off road. So they still suck in my eyes. That's why i now own new Swampers but also road tyres.
White 92 GQ TD42 LWB (AKA Putt putt)
licorice all sorts added
Posts: 1253
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 1:34 am
Location: QLD

Post by Jeeps »

I've got MTRs and i'm about to fit my second set. Excellent onroad and off, crap in the mud but i love em' :D
Posts: 1918
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 6:03 pm
Location: Victoria

Post by Jimbo »

My 33" BFG's are good on and off road but as ppl have mentioned they easily get mud in the bead and have to be cleaned out. Mine have been on for around 40k and are not close to 50% worn yet.
GQII Patrol YAY!!
User avatar
Dee
Posts: 2314
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:35 pm
Location: Sunny Coast, QLD

Post by Dee »

cody82 wrote:Well this thread has made tyre choosing harder, good to get a view opinions,I guess you cant get it all in 1 tyre, my mainapplication would be loose rocks and muddy trails and hills and on road. From what I have gathered BFG probably suite more I'm temptedto wait till the new MK2 comes in see how that goes..
Just thought I'd add, (that going by the website) the KM2's will only be made in R16" & up. (Ie none to fit 15" rims)..

Way to cut yourself out of a market if you ask me... :roll: :x
Posts: 179
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 5:17 pm
Location: earth

BFG

Post by stormpatrol »

MATE JUST GOT MYSELF A SET O BFG MT for the road and im real happy not real noisy handle wet roads ok [got pedes for off road ] go get the bfg you wont be sorry 33/ 12.5 cost me $280.00 at bob jane t mart
THE SMOKER YOU DRINK THE DANCER YOU GET
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Re: BFG

Post by bogged »

stormpatrol wrote:MATE JUST GOT MYSELF A SET O BFG MT for the road and im real happy not real noisy handle wet roads ok
all tires are brilliant when new... its after 20,000 when the edge has gone that they suck arse.
Posts: 542
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 10:28 am
Location: pomona,sunshine coast

Post by GRINCH »

i was running mtrs very happy with them then went to bfgs because they where slightly cheaper and promised longer life, but i really wish i went mtrs again so much better on road handleing
Posts: 313
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2002 12:20 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by Duff »

have you considered micky T baja claws. i had MTR's and i was very pleased with em untill they wore out :( never suffered any tyre damage. then i tried some baja claws and drove then about 10000 kms till they got stolen :( and i was happy with these aswell. i think for a mud tyre the claws are better but for a rock tyre the MTR's are better. i have not tryed BFG as i heard too many bad stories about em and i would not even touch a cooper tyre. just my 2 cents worth
Posts: 447
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:44 am
Location: Townsville

Post by BigMav »

I have 33" MTR's on my maverick and have been pretty happy with them as an allrounder. Have done about 50000kms and I would think there is about another 20000 left in them. My rig is pretty heavy, about 2.8 tonne and has done some hard kays offroad through the simpson and a lot of corrugated tracks through the territory. Not a single puncture or any sidewall damage in that time. I carried an extra spare wrangler through the simpson and it stayed on the roof the whole time. As for mud I find them ok in all but the very muddiest tracks, I can live with that as I believe they are far superior to the BFG's on the tar.
1989 Ford Maverick Turbo Diesel Tourer
4" spring lift 2" body lift
33" MT/R's
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by cody82 »

Nar havnt considered claws, nobody i know has them nor knows much about them, as for the bfg's and mtr's both have pros and cons off road fopr what I do but the on raod performance will be the decider for me, still havnt made my mind up yet!
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

cody82 wrote:Nar havnt considered claws, nobody i know has them nor knows much about them, as for the bfg's and mtr's both have pros and cons off road fopr what I do but the on raod performance will be the decider for me, still havnt made my mind up yet!
You will never get a clear cut answer on tires...

Some people say that swampers/claws/boggers/mtr/bfg/ST/STT/MTZ/ATZ/etc were teh best road tire they ever had...
others will say swampers/claws/boggers/mtr/bfg/ST/STT/MTZ/ATZ/etc were the worst they ever had....
others will say my mates dogs roots neighbours budgies egg hatched and overheard the farmer saying that swampers/claws/boggers/mtr/bfg/ST/STT/MTZ/ATZ/etc were the best he ever had..
then again, that dogs twin brother overheard the farmer saying that swampers/claws/boggers/mtr/bfg/ST/STT/MTZ/ATZ/etc were the worst he ever had.

Best option is to stick with what you know best. Or see what your mates are using and if they are happy, and going everywhere, then go with what they are using. You cant go wrong then.


YMMV
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by cody82 »

As mentioned with bfg's and mud in the beed is this a factor with both the a/t and m/t tyre?

Think I will go the BFG's , providing the are acceptable on the wet roads. Thanks for the input !
Posts: 179
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 5:17 pm
Location: earth

go get em

Post by stormpatrol »

even my dog likes the bfs to pee on :armsup: :bad-words: lol lol
THE SMOKER YOU DRINK THE DANCER YOU GET
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests