Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
MORE POWER
MORE POWER
Hey people i have just bought a 93 suzuki sierra it has 31 inch muddies on it rear lock right locker 3 inch body lift 3 inch spring lift ect ect but the problem i am having it is very slugish after about 85 to 90 kmp any suggestions on how to make the little 1.4 go a bit better with out conversion or spending big money cheers
Master of my own domain
how is lowing going to lower wind resistance? no being a smat ass but i dont see how it would? i do under stand all race cars are low but there like 10mm of the groundVR Rodeo wrote:Lower it by around 3 inches for less wind resistance
91 SWB Sierra. 16v 1.6efi, extractors, 6.1gears, SPOA, 32 BF muddys and 2inch bodylift
Same principle, anything that is lower to the ground will be less bulky and create less wind resistence. Admittedly it wont make much difference but he wanted a cheap, easy fix 31's will fit on 3 inches of lift and there is no real cheap or easy power fix for the 1.3. Webers require fiddly tuning, extractors/snorkels do bugger all and gears make it more 'driveable' off the mark and on hills but the 1.3 runs out of puff much over 90 k's.brendan_h wrote:how is lowing going to lower wind resistance? no being a smat ass but i dont see how it would? i do under stand all race cars are low but there like 10mm of the groundVR Rodeo wrote:Lower it by around 3 inches for less wind resistance
'92 Rodeo - VR V6, T700, 31's
'89 Zook - 4 inch lift, 32's, 5.14 gears, RUF, F&R Lockrights, Rear Disconnect, Falcon/Landcruiser PS
'89 Zook - 4 inch lift, 32's, 5.14 gears, RUF, F&R Lockrights, Rear Disconnect, Falcon/Landcruiser PS
well I dont agree with you at all. extractors make a big difference and so do gears.VR Rodeo wrote:Same principle, anything that is lower to the ground will be less bulky and create less wind resistence. Admittedly it wont make much difference but he wanted a cheap, easy fix 31's will fit on 3 inches of lift and there is no real cheap or easy power fix for the 1.3. Webers require fiddly tuning, extractors/snorkels do bugger all and gears make it more 'driveable' off the mark and on hills but the 1.3 runs out of puff much over 90 k's.brendan_h wrote:how is lowing going to lower wind resistance? no being a smat ass but i dont see how it would? i do under stand all race cars are low but there like 10mm of the groundVR Rodeo wrote:Lower it by around 3 inches for less wind resistance
the difference between stock exhaust vs extractors and 2 1/4 pipe and new muffler is massive
and getting the gearing back to standard for highway work makes the most sense of any of it! its easier to hit 100 when you have five gears to do so and the proper loading of the motor at 100. its no good being at 100 in 5th if your only going to be revving at 1500 rpm, it just doesn't work!
maybe you need a fresh motor aswell, but the mods you think are useless will help alot!
TUFFZUK, do a bit of a simple tune up, plugs, leads, coil, maybe a dissy cap.
get a decent exhaust and extractors, get your carby tuned?
return your ratios back to normal for highway, I would propably go for tranfer gears as with 31s you will gain back stock highrange ratio, but have a much better crawl ratio, if you do put in diff gears your transfer ratio is stock and that can get a bit anoying when you are hitting things with just a little bit too much pace! then you will want transfer gears anyway, but that will make your high range gearing lower than standard as you have transfer and diff gears, but then you can upgrade and go to bigger tyres!
oh and the more rubber you have on the road the more drag you are creating on the car, the more power you will zap!
so dont run low pressures all the time, sure its comfy but you will lose speed and econemy!
I had a sierra with 37 mtrs, hilux diff with 5.29, 6-1 rockhoppers and I think its ratio may have been a smidge under standars, it also had a 1.6 carby vit motor, but it flew along! would do 110 - 120 on the freeway without full throttle and it got there fast too!
the load on the motor was less than the factory gave it!
it was revving at 4000 rpm at 110, but even though it went over the wiegh bridge at 1150kg it was easy for the motor to push due to gearing!
well that was a novel I think I need a sleep!
ashley
build http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/ftopic130159.php&highlight=
IMHO = who cares if your Opinion is Humble! its your opinion isn't it?
so IMO it a waste of a H
IMHO = who cares if your Opinion is Humble! its your opinion isn't it?
so IMO it a waste of a H
Dont get me wrong, I never said they were uselessgermo wrote:well I dont agree with you at all. extractors make a big difference and so do gears.
the difference between stock exhaust vs extractors and 2 1/4 pipe and new muffler is massive
and getting the gearing back to standard for highway work makes the most sense of any of it! its easier to hit 100 when you have five gears to do so and the proper loading of the motor at 100. its no good being at 100 in 5th if your only going to be revving at 1500 rpm, it just doesn't work!
maybe you need a fresh motor aswell, but the mods you think are useless will help alot!
ashley
I agree with you on the gears being about the best option for him, so long as he realises that at the end of the day 47kw is never going to make a V8 supercar without some money being spent on it.
'92 Rodeo - VR V6, T700, 31's
'89 Zook - 4 inch lift, 32's, 5.14 gears, RUF, F&R Lockrights, Rear Disconnect, Falcon/Landcruiser PS
'89 Zook - 4 inch lift, 32's, 5.14 gears, RUF, F&R Lockrights, Rear Disconnect, Falcon/Landcruiser PS
yeah your right, its all relative, I just assume people realise that it is only a 20yr old 1.3l technology, not the latest 6L v8.VR Rodeo wrote:Dont get me wrong, I never said they were uselessgermo wrote:well I dont agree with you at all. extractors make a big difference and so do gears.
the difference between stock exhaust vs extractors and 2 1/4 pipe and new muffler is massive
and getting the gearing back to standard for highway work makes the most sense of any of it! its easier to hit 100 when you have five gears to do so and the proper loading of the motor at 100. its no good being at 100 in 5th if your only going to be revving at 1500 rpm, it just doesn't work!
maybe you need a fresh motor aswell, but the mods you think are useless will help alot!
ashley
I agree with you on the gears being about the best option for him, so long as he realises that at the end of the day 47kw is never going to make a V8 supercar without some money being spent on it.
to Assume is to make an ASS of U and Me. ASS-U-ME
I have realised this year after buying another suzuki that I have a problem, I might be a zukaholic
ashley
build http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/ftopic130159.php&highlight=
IMHO = who cares if your Opinion is Humble! its your opinion isn't it?
so IMO it a waste of a H
IMHO = who cares if your Opinion is Humble! its your opinion isn't it?
so IMO it a waste of a H
extractors will not make any noticeable difference to a stock 1.3 (it will sound quicker tho) getting your engine in good nick would be better like sevice,plugs maybe carby kit,rebuild,etc etc... i have had alot of 1.3 sierras and my sierra with extractors lukey exhaust made no difference, yet my other sierra stock exhaust etc seemed like it had twice the power the only difference was that it had low ks,
skez wrote:extractors will not make any noticeable difference to a stock 1.3 (it will sound quicker tho) getting your engine in good nick would be better like sevice,plugs maybe carby kit,rebuild,etc etc... i have had alot of 1.3 sierras and my sierra with extractors lukey exhaust made no difference, yet my other sierra stock exhaust etc seemed like it had twice the power the only difference was that it had low ks,
???? er. so stock is as good as it gets. Yea goodo. Myself and everyone else who has ever added this useless piece of junk will larf at this stupid statement.
If it breaks, excellent, time for an upgrade
as i said wont make any noticable difference on a stock engine and yes i put one on mine and still have it, so if ure saying when u drove out of the muffler place you noticed a power difference not just a loud exhaust maybe your old exhaust had leaks or something beacause evan if it did gain some hp u wouldnt be able to feel the difference it would that small might see it on a dyno tho, its a bit like putting premium in your stocko i cant notice the power difference its still slow as shit
Made a massive differance to power and fuel economy when I did it to my Nissan, and expect it will make a reasonable amount of differance when I do the exhaust on the Suzi. Even though the suzuki is only a small engine, it can not be expected to breathe properly through that thickshake straw we call a standard exhaust, and after 20 years I expect there will be some sort of blockage in the catalytic convertor. I'll be awfully suprised if there is no differance in power when I do the exhaust, especially around the top end which is where it really suffers now.skez wrote:as i said wont make any noticable difference on a stock engine and yes i put one on mine and still have it, so if ure saying when u drove out of the muffler place you noticed a power difference not just a loud exhaust maybe your old exhaust had leaks or something beacause evan if it did gain some hp u wouldnt be able to feel the difference it would that small might see it on a dyno tho, its a bit like putting premium in your stocko i cant notice the power difference its still slow as shit
we can all rave on about extractors etc, yes they make a difference, but not one i've ever been impressed with. the best thing to do is make sure the air fuel mixture is right, and forget about 32-36's, they are crap and nothing but trouble offroad. a thing to do wether you have a sierra carby, or better yet, a vitara carby is to super glue the tamper-proof mixture screw (so it can be adjusted with fingers), let it harden then take it to someone who can get CO levels to what they should be at idle. all sierra and vit carbs burn too rich. try this as its cheap and you WILL notice the improvement.
lwb 1.6efi,4sp auto,f&r airlockers,dual t/cases.custom coils.builder of ROAD LEGAL custom suzukis...and other stuff.
CAD modelling-TECH drawings-DXF preparation.
http://www.auszookers.com/index.php
CAD modelling-TECH drawings-DXF preparation.
http://www.auszookers.com/index.php
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests