Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

MORE POWER

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Post Reply
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 7:27 pm
Location: ROMSEY

MORE POWER

Post by TUFZUK »

Hey people i have just bought a 93 suzuki sierra it has 31 inch muddies on it rear lock right locker 3 inch body lift 3 inch spring lift ect ect but the problem i am having it is very slugish after about 85 to 90 kmp any suggestions on how to make the little 1.4 go a bit better with out conversion or spending big money cheers
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 9:38 pm
Location: melbourne

Post by a reef »

fitted new diff gear min 4.1 0r 4.6 or 5.1 from vitara very cheap
Master of my own domain
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:01 pm
Location: Shellharbour, NSW

Post by mike_nofx »

When you find out let me know haha

Mine tops out at 100kmh. (80 on the speedo) im running 33's.

Remember if you have 31's that your speedo is out. so 85-90 could be well over 100kmh

Mike

ps. did you mean 1.3 or 1.4?
Posts: 3940
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 1:09 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast Qld

Post by want33s »

If you have a 1.4 then some one has already put a bigger motor in it.
Sierras come with 1.3.

Fit transfer or diff gears to get your final drive ratio back to standard.
A search of the bible or threads will reveal at least 100 threads on this topic.

Jas.
Posts: 377
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:03 pm
Location: Perth

Post by VR Rodeo »

Lower it by around 3 inches for less wind resistance
'92 Rodeo - VR V6, T700, 31's
'89 Zook - 4 inch lift, 32's, 5.14 gears, RUF, F&R Lockrights, Rear Disconnect, Falcon/Landcruiser PS
Posts: 835
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 4:56 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by brendan_h »

VR Rodeo wrote:Lower it by around 3 inches for less wind resistance
how is lowing going to lower wind resistance? no being a smat ass but i dont see how it would? i do under stand all race cars are low but there like 10mm of the ground
91 SWB Sierra. 16v 1.6efi, extractors, 6.1gears, SPOA, 32 BF muddys and 2inch bodylift
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: katoomba

Post by cozook »

brendan_h wrote:
VR Rodeo wrote:Lower it by around 3 inches for less wind resistance
how is lowing going to lower wind resistance? no being a smat ass but i dont see how it would? i do under stand all race cars are low but there like 10mm of the ground
3 inch chop on roof!.......sierra speedster.... ;)
Posts: 377
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:03 pm
Location: Perth

Post by VR Rodeo »

brendan_h wrote:
VR Rodeo wrote:Lower it by around 3 inches for less wind resistance
how is lowing going to lower wind resistance? no being a smat ass but i dont see how it would? i do under stand all race cars are low but there like 10mm of the ground
Same principle, anything that is lower to the ground will be less bulky and create less wind resistence. Admittedly it wont make much difference but he wanted a cheap, easy fix ;) 31's will fit on 3 inches of lift and there is no real cheap or easy power fix for the 1.3. Webers require fiddly tuning, extractors/snorkels do bugger all and gears make it more 'driveable' off the mark and on hills but the 1.3 runs out of puff much over 90 k's.
'92 Rodeo - VR V6, T700, 31's
'89 Zook - 4 inch lift, 32's, 5.14 gears, RUF, F&R Lockrights, Rear Disconnect, Falcon/Landcruiser PS
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 4:26 pm
Location: back in the bush ;)

Post by germo »

VR Rodeo wrote:
brendan_h wrote:
VR Rodeo wrote:Lower it by around 3 inches for less wind resistance
how is lowing going to lower wind resistance? no being a smat ass but i dont see how it would? i do under stand all race cars are low but there like 10mm of the ground
Same principle, anything that is lower to the ground will be less bulky and create less wind resistence. Admittedly it wont make much difference but he wanted a cheap, easy fix ;) 31's will fit on 3 inches of lift and there is no real cheap or easy power fix for the 1.3. Webers require fiddly tuning, extractors/snorkels do bugger all and gears make it more 'driveable' off the mark and on hills but the 1.3 runs out of puff much over 90 k's.
well I dont agree with you at all. extractors make a big difference and so do gears.
the difference between stock exhaust vs extractors and 2 1/4 pipe and new muffler is massive
and getting the gearing back to standard for highway work makes the most sense of any of it! its easier to hit 100 when you have five gears to do so and the proper loading of the motor at 100. its no good being at 100 in 5th if your only going to be revving at 1500 rpm, it just doesn't work!

maybe you need a fresh motor aswell, but the mods you think are useless will help alot!

TUFFZUK, do a bit of a simple tune up, plugs, leads, coil, maybe a dissy cap.
get a decent exhaust and extractors, get your carby tuned?
return your ratios back to normal for highway, I would propably go for tranfer gears as with 31s you will gain back stock highrange ratio, but have a much better crawl ratio, if you do put in diff gears your transfer ratio is stock and that can get a bit anoying when you are hitting things with just a little bit too much pace! then you will want transfer gears anyway, but that will make your high range gearing lower than standard as you have transfer and diff gears, but then you can upgrade and go to bigger tyres!
oh and the more rubber you have on the road the more drag you are creating on the car, the more power you will zap!
so dont run low pressures all the time, sure its comfy but you will lose speed and econemy!

I had a sierra with 37 mtrs, hilux diff with 5.29, 6-1 rockhoppers and I think its ratio may have been a smidge under standars, it also had a 1.6 carby vit motor, but it flew along! would do 110 - 120 on the freeway without full throttle and it got there fast too!
the load on the motor was less than the factory gave it!
it was revving at 4000 rpm at 110, but even though it went over the wiegh bridge at 1150kg it was easy for the motor to push due to gearing!

well that was a novel I think I need a sleep!
ashley
build http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/ftopic130159.php&highlight=
IMHO = who cares if your Opinion is Humble! its your opinion isn't it?
so IMO it a waste of a H
Posts: 2169
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:41 pm
Location: melbourne

Post by joeblow »

don't worry, 31's and 5.1 diff gears you will still have plenty low range.
lwb 1.6efi,4sp auto,f&r airlockers,dual t/cases.custom coils.builder of ROAD LEGAL custom suzukis...and other stuff.
CAD modelling-TECH drawings-DXF preparation.
http://www.auszookers.com/index.php
Posts: 377
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:03 pm
Location: Perth

Post by VR Rodeo »

germo wrote:well I dont agree with you at all. extractors make a big difference and so do gears.
the difference between stock exhaust vs extractors and 2 1/4 pipe and new muffler is massive
and getting the gearing back to standard for highway work makes the most sense of any of it! its easier to hit 100 when you have five gears to do so and the proper loading of the motor at 100. its no good being at 100 in 5th if your only going to be revving at 1500 rpm, it just doesn't work!

maybe you need a fresh motor aswell, but the mods you think are useless will help alot!
ashley
Dont get me wrong, I never said they were useless ;)

I agree with you on the gears being about the best option for him, so long as he realises that at the end of the day 47kw is never going to make a V8 supercar without some money being spent on it.
'92 Rodeo - VR V6, T700, 31's
'89 Zook - 4 inch lift, 32's, 5.14 gears, RUF, F&R Lockrights, Rear Disconnect, Falcon/Landcruiser PS
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:36 pm
Location: Darwin NT Australia

Post by chuckwilltalk »

extarctors and exhaust, 32/36 Weber, service motor
04 SR5 3.0TD Dual Cab Hilux
3"dump, 2.5" pipes, MTZs, Hella Ralley 4000 HID

www.DARWIN4x4.NET
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 4:26 pm
Location: back in the bush ;)

Post by germo »

VR Rodeo wrote:
germo wrote:well I dont agree with you at all. extractors make a big difference and so do gears.
the difference between stock exhaust vs extractors and 2 1/4 pipe and new muffler is massive
and getting the gearing back to standard for highway work makes the most sense of any of it! its easier to hit 100 when you have five gears to do so and the proper loading of the motor at 100. its no good being at 100 in 5th if your only going to be revving at 1500 rpm, it just doesn't work!

maybe you need a fresh motor aswell, but the mods you think are useless will help alot!
ashley
Dont get me wrong, I never said they were useless ;)

I agree with you on the gears being about the best option for him, so long as he realises that at the end of the day 47kw is never going to make a V8 supercar without some money being spent on it.
yeah your right, its all relative, I just assume people realise that it is only a 20yr old 1.3l technology, not the latest 6L v8.

to Assume is to make an ASS of U and Me. ASS-U-ME

I have realised this year after buying another suzuki that I have a problem, I might be a zukaholic

ashley
build http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/ftopic130159.php&highlight=
IMHO = who cares if your Opinion is Humble! its your opinion isn't it?
so IMO it a waste of a H
Posts: 298
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 5:17 pm
Location: Mackay QLD

Post by skez »

extractors will not make any noticeable difference to a stock 1.3 (it will sound quicker tho) getting your engine in good nick would be better like sevice,plugs maybe carby kit,rebuild,etc etc... i have had alot of 1.3 sierras and my sierra with extractors lukey exhaust made no difference, yet my other sierra stock exhaust etc seemed like it had twice the power the only difference was that it had low ks,
Posts: 194
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:07 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by mick85 »

They are not very aerodynamically friendly :)
1994 Sierra for Sale - Check the For Sale Section
Banned
Posts: 690
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 2:35 pm
Location: Coffin Bay

Post by david123 »

skez wrote:extractors will not make any noticeable difference to a stock 1.3 (it will sound quicker tho) getting your engine in good nick would be better like sevice,plugs maybe carby kit,rebuild,etc etc... i have had alot of 1.3 sierras and my sierra with extractors lukey exhaust made no difference, yet my other sierra stock exhaust etc seemed like it had twice the power the only difference was that it had low ks,


???? er. so stock is as good as it gets. Yea goodo. Myself and everyone else who has ever added this useless piece of junk will larf at this stupid statement.
If it breaks, excellent, time for an upgrade
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:12 pm
Location: sydney

Post by zoook »

5.14 calminis for the transfer is for you bud it will go good on the road and off it my last puppy had this set up 31s..lift 5.14s it went good
Posts: 298
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 5:17 pm
Location: Mackay QLD

Post by skez »

as i said wont make any noticable difference on a stock engine and yes i put one on mine and still have it, so if ure saying when u drove out of the muffler place you noticed a power difference not just a loud exhaust maybe your old exhaust had leaks or something beacause evan if it did gain some hp u wouldnt be able to feel the difference it would that small might see it on a dyno tho, its a bit like putting premium in your stocko i cant notice the power difference its still slow as shit
Posts: 179
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:43 pm
Location: Shidney

Post by RockHopper »

skez wrote:as i said wont make any noticable difference on a stock engine and yes i put one on mine and still have it, so if ure saying when u drove out of the muffler place you noticed a power difference not just a loud exhaust maybe your old exhaust had leaks or something beacause evan if it did gain some hp u wouldnt be able to feel the difference it would that small might see it on a dyno tho, its a bit like putting premium in your stocko i cant notice the power difference its still slow as shit
Made a massive differance to power and fuel economy when I did it to my Nissan, and expect it will make a reasonable amount of differance when I do the exhaust on the Suzi. Even though the suzuki is only a small engine, it can not be expected to breathe properly through that thickshake straw we call a standard exhaust, and after 20 years I expect there will be some sort of blockage in the catalytic convertor. I'll be awfully suprised if there is no differance in power when I do the exhaust, especially around the top end which is where it really suffers now.
Posts: 2169
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:41 pm
Location: melbourne

Post by joeblow »

we can all rave on about extractors etc, yes they make a difference, but not one i've ever been impressed with. the best thing to do is make sure the air fuel mixture is right, and forget about 32-36's, they are crap and nothing but trouble offroad. a thing to do wether you have a sierra carby, or better yet, a vitara carby is to super glue the tamper-proof mixture screw (so it can be adjusted with fingers), let it harden then take it to someone who can get CO levels to what they should be at idle. all sierra and vit carbs burn too rich. try this as its cheap and you WILL notice the improvement.
lwb 1.6efi,4sp auto,f&r airlockers,dual t/cases.custom coils.builder of ROAD LEGAL custom suzukis...and other stuff.
CAD modelling-TECH drawings-DXF preparation.
http://www.auszookers.com/index.php
Posts: 162
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:48 pm
Location: gold coast, qld

Post by zookieboi »

hey, i bought a swift gti engine for my zook this week. 200 bucks :twisted:

and i looked on wiki and its about a 20 kw increase and relatively easy to install. ( almost same engine ) id suggest doing that.
Posts: 4073
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:13 pm

Post by lump_a_charcoal »

They are very revvy, and don't necessarily offer the best for a sierra off road...
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests