Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
gq swb wheelbase extension
gq swb wheelbase extension
Can anyone please post some pics of a swb wheelbase extension thats has been done just want to see all the mounts that have been moved?
and can it be passed in QLD?
Cheers
Ben
and can it be passed in QLD?
Cheers
Ben
extension
To make it a bit more stable and better departure angle. Want to move it back by about 300mm.
ute
Going to put a ute cab on
Link
Good link but dont want to chop the chassis as i have been told its harder to get mod plate for a chassis extension over moving the mounts back is this right?
Hey ozzy1 would i be able to get some closeup pics of your extension please would really like to see how you braced the coil mounts?ozy1 wrote:i think the better way to do this is to move the coil mounts back on the chassis and fit longer links, might as well go 4 link at the same time, or worst case fit a new panhard mont, fit a new shock brace and relocated fuel tank,
its the way i did mine, but im in NSW,
Cheers
Benny
what makes you think its the neatest? please explain,65Mog wrote:I've seen this done both ways and cutting the chassis in the middle and adding a piece in is the best and neatest way to do it. If it's done properly the join will be the strongest part of the chassis.
i will admit, we left the original coil mounts in place, so we can always run a standard shorty wheel base, which we will never do again, a bit longer is absolutely awesome,
plus, chopping the chassis and adding a section really does nothing for his depature angle now does it?
im almost finished doing my shortyjust have to weld in the shock mounts and make a new rear floor pan, so you can come have alook at one in the flesh if you want. I get back to town on moday morning and go back to work friday arve so anytime this week is ok.
GQ SWB
Twin Turbo
F & R Air lockers
Roll Cage
Loose Nut Behind the Wheel
LOOKING FOR SPONSORS???
mum can't afford it anymore! hahaha
Twin Turbo
F & R Air lockers
Roll Cage
Loose Nut Behind the Wheel
LOOKING FOR SPONSORS???
mum can't afford it anymore! hahaha
also my opinion only 12 inches is too mush you might as well go buy a wagon chassis and just trim the back off behind the panhard mount. When you get into it a small amount makes a big difference.
GQ SWB
Twin Turbo
F & R Air lockers
Roll Cage
Loose Nut Behind the Wheel
LOOKING FOR SPONSORS???
mum can't afford it anymore! hahaha
Twin Turbo
F & R Air lockers
Roll Cage
Loose Nut Behind the Wheel
LOOKING FOR SPONSORS???
mum can't afford it anymore! hahaha
how much
how much did you do on yours?
Except for someone who's been wheeling with the shorty for a while, the LWB will be too much of a barge.ELF_83 wrote:also my opinion only 12 inches is too mush you might as well go buy a wagon chassis and just trim the back off behind the panhard mount. When you get into it a small amount makes a big difference.
That is assuming they dont want to add a teaspoon of concrete to their morning cuppa of course.
Thanks
Thanks heaps for going to the trouble of taking those pics ozy1 they are a great help.
Cheers
Ben
Cheers
Ben
It's neater because if it's done right 90% of people would never pick it, that's what I was trying to say. In my opinion adding a piece in the middle is the better way to do it. Your opinion is different to mine, but this guy asked a question and I gave him my opinion just like you did.ozy1 wrote:what makes you think its the neatest? please explain,65Mog wrote:I've seen this done both ways and cutting the chassis in the middle and adding a piece in is the best and neatest way to do it. If it's done properly the join will be the strongest part of the chassis.
i will admit, we left the original coil mounts in place, so we can always run a standard shorty wheel base, which we will never do again, a bit longer is absolutely awesome,
plus, chopping the chassis and adding a section really does nothing for his depature angle now does it?
Ozy, just out of interest, which chassis did you cut them coil mount sections out of?ozy1 wrote:not a problem, if you have anything specific you want pics or details on just ask,
just so you know my lower links are 1050long with an A Fame, longest ranchos i could source, with coils retained top and bottom,
They fit quite nicely and look very neat!
Don't expect to see my recipe, until I receive my cheque and collection fee
Would you be able to show some pics of this done and the process on how to do it right??65Mog wrote:It's neater because if it's done right 90% of people would never pick it, that's what I was trying to say. In my opinion adding a piece in the middle is the better way to do it. Your opinion is different to mine, but this guy asked a question and I gave him my opinion just like you did.ozy1 wrote:what makes you think its the neatest? please explain,65Mog wrote:I've seen this done both ways and cutting the chassis in the middle and adding a piece in is the best and neatest way to do it. If it's done properly the join will be the strongest part of the chassis.
i will admit, we left the original coil mounts in place, so we can always run a standard shorty wheel base, which we will never do again, a bit longer is absolutely awesome,
plus, chopping the chassis and adding a section really does nothing for his depature angle now does it?
the coil mounts are GQ, i picked up some 6mm, RHS, and cut one side out of it to get the chassis level, the engineer though it was a good idea when i told him about the plan,lolergram wrote:Ozy, just out of interest, which chassis did you cut them coil mount sections out of?ozy1 wrote:not a problem, if you have anything specific you want pics or details on just ask,
just so you know my lower links are 1050long with an A Fame, longest ranchos i could source, with coils retained top and bottom,
They fit quite nicely and look very neat!
Sorry I don't have any close pictures of it actually being done, but I've sent you a PM with some pictures of the patrol in question.swb_ute wrote:Would you be able to show some pics of this done and the process on how to do it right??65Mog wrote:It's neater because if it's done right 90% of people would never pick it, that's what I was trying to say. In my opinion adding a piece in the middle is the better way to do it. Your opinion is different to mine, but this guy asked a question and I gave him my opinion just like you did.ozy1 wrote:what makes you think its the neatest? please explain,65Mog wrote:I've seen this done both ways and cutting the chassis in the middle and adding a piece in is the best and neatest way to do it. If it's done properly the join will be the strongest part of the chassis.
i will admit, we left the original coil mounts in place, so we can always run a standard shorty wheel base, which we will never do again, a bit longer is absolutely awesome,
plus, chopping the chassis and adding a section really does nothing for his depature angle now does it?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests