Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

1.3 sierra and 1.6 vitara fuel economy figures

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:52 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

1.3 sierra and 1.6 vitara fuel economy figures

Post by islandvitara »

Hi all, just wanting to know what sort of fuel figures other people get from there 1.3 sierra's and figures from 1.6 carby/efi vitara's and sierra's. also state what contributng mods oyu have also :D

Mines a stock softop with 235's and on full tank of 40L I get 334km's....highway and town driving.....equates to 11.97L/100km so rounded off to 12Litres per 100km's :shock:

so what do you's get with your zooks?


Also what revs are you's doin at 60, 80 and 100kph?

66kph - 2900 in 4th, 2600 in 5th,
88kph - 3500 in 4th, 2900 in 5th
111kph - 3500 in 5th


could be interesting to see who gets what from their zooks :armsup: :cool:
Last edited by islandvitara on Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:36 pm, edited 5 times in total.
just beat a Marlin in a swimming race
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:52 am
Location: Perth, WA

Post by alien »

10L per 100 is considered normal... given larger tyres you'd expect that to drop too.

with mine (SPOA and 31s) i get about 230km to 30L... my tank is too dented to go further =) lol

with 31's and 5.14 tcase gears my revs are:
- 60km/hr, 4th - 2400rpm
- 80km/hr, 5th - 2400rpm
- 90km/hr, 5th - 3100rpm (?)
- 100km/hr, 5th - 3400rpm (i think?)

i find this gearing pretty decent - however im running 1.6 EFI engine as well, so i have the torque advantage over the 1.3.

when i had the 1.3 carby engine and 215/75's my revs were almost identical to what i have now.

EDIT: also -your tyres are 11% over stock size - so your speedo and odometer are out that much as well.... hence 330km = 366.5km and 60km/hr = 66.6km/hr, & 100km/hr = 111km/hr.
The worst thing about censorship is ███████.
Posts: 189
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:41 am
Location: Anywhere

Post by lockdup »

I got about 260k's out of my 30L tank. Im very happy with that.
5.12, 34" SUPERSWAMPER, REAR AIR LOCKED
Posts: 189
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:41 am
Location: Anywhere

Post by lockdup »

I got about 260k's out of my 30L tank. Im very happy with that.
5.12, 34" SUPERSWAMPER, REAR AIR LOCKED
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:52 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Post by islandvitara »

edit: 2400rpm @ 60kph in 5th :D



well as for the fuel - around 400km/40L would be normal lol but as u said bigger tyres and a tired engine dropped that alot..like 330km is running the tank dry!! the needle is below the empty line when it reads 330km haha

i can say 280 - 300km to be safe, just seems my sierra is sculling fuel like its cheap :roll:
just beat a Marlin in a swimming race
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

So how many litres do you put in the tank when you've "run it dry", because 360km from a tank sounds pretty good to me.

Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:52 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Post by islandvitara »

ive run my sierra pretty much dry almost and put in 38.something Litres in assuming there was around 1litre of fuel in the tank.....the tank is 40litres yeah? ive assumed it is :D

i reset the "kilometer counter" and when i ran it "dry" it read 334km.....


i just thought i wasnt getting good fuel economy since its using more than 10L/100km..
just beat a Marlin in a swimming race
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:52 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Post by islandvitara »

i was aiming to get around 370 - 400km per tank but NOT LIKELY LOL :lol: i'd be very happy to be getting even close to 10L/100km :armsup:
just beat a Marlin in a swimming race
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:43 am
Location: Wangaratta

Post by Guy »

I loaned my mum my zuk back when it was little. (tin top with 235's and extractors and a 2 inch exhaust)
She got just over 440 to a tank .. I rarely bested 330 .. depends on the way you drive.

She drove it like a a 50 year old mum would, gently accelerate, sit just below 100 etc...
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

islandvitara wrote:ive run my sierra pretty much dry almost and put in 38.something Litres in assuming there was around 1litre of fuel in the tank.....the tank is 40litres yeah? ive assumed it is :D

i reset the "kilometer counter" and when i ran it "dry" it read 334km.....


i just thought i wasnt getting good fuel economy since its using more than 10L/100km..
You're arguing about 0.5l/100km? you're getting 10.5/100 based on your figures. I assume you are a young guy - I think that's pretty good economy. I've never seen a sierra get under 10 in my experience.

Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:52 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Post by islandvitara »

Gwagensteve wrote:
islandvitara wrote:ive run my sierra pretty much dry almost and put in 38.something Litres in assuming there was around 1litre of fuel in the tank.....the tank is 40litres yeah? ive assumed it is :D

i reset the "kilometer counter" and when i ran it "dry" it read 334km.....


i just thought i wasnt getting good fuel economy since its using more than 10L/100km..
You're arguing about 0.5l/100km? you're getting 10.5/100 based on your figures. I assume you are a young guy - I think that's pretty good economy. I've never seen a sierra get under 10 in my experience.

Steve.
lol i must have calculated it wrong haha Steve how did you calculate that? f thats what im getting according to your calculation im happy!!! im 22 so yes young =D :armsup:
just beat a Marlin in a swimming race
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:52 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Post by islandvitara »

well i done some calculating and this is what i came up with:

334km divided by 40L = 8.35

so 1litre of fuel travels the zook 8.35km's

so i divided 8.35km's by 100km to get the litres per 100 km figure and came up with 11.97km per 100km's...

i suppose the 235's drop the economy so i guess im satisfyed with that sorta fuel usage :D

that s correct my figure i got hey? lol
just beat a Marlin in a swimming race
Posts: 7345
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 3:29 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Gwagensteve »

Have you corrected for tyre size?

You travelled 334 on the speedo, +11% = 366.5km from 38.something litres=10.5l/100km.

Steve.
[quote="greg"] some say he is a man without happy dreams, or that he sees silver linings on clouds and wonders why they are not platinum... all we know, is he's called the stevie.[/quote]
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:52 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Post by islandvitara »

Gwagensteve wrote:Have you corrected for tyre size?

You travelled 334 on the speedo, +11% = 366.5km from 38.something litres=10.5l/100km.

Steve.

oh forgot the tyre increase %... shall recalculate....so i got 10.91litres per 100km's :D :armsup: :armsup: :armsup: thats AWSOME i didnt take into account the 11% tyre difference.

im VERY happy with that figure :armsup:
just beat a Marlin in a swimming race
Posts: 1413
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 5:54 pm
Location: Perth

Post by Moph »

My tintop did 11.5L/100k stock, then 12.5L/100k on 235/75x15 MTRs + 2" body lift. Now got 6.5s in it with 31" Cooper STTs to go on when I get my act together, so will be interesting to see what that does to it.

The really interesting bit though is that it doesn't seem to mind how it's driven ... the difference between towing a 500kg trailer at 110 km/h versus gentle country cruising vs sand vs hoof down peak traffic is about 0.5L/100km ... go figure! :?
God Of Emo
Posts: 7350
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2003 7:04 pm
Location: Newy, home of the ZOOK (Rockin the 'diff)

Post by lay80n »

Mine gets approx 10.0L/100km on the swampers, i hammer it round a fair bit offroad, onroad it is driven as you would a zook on swampers. Economy hardly changes regardless of how its driven.

Layto....
[quote="v840"]Just between me and you, I actually really dig the Megatwon, but if anyone asks, I'm going to shitcan it as much as possible! :D[/quote]
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:52 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Post by islandvitara »

yea same economy doesnt really change depending on how i drive it. i give it to it off road and drive proper onroad - i dont bother rushing in town i just got my opens after a 2yr good behaviour driving probation lol so i do drive "normal" onroad and leave the fun to offroad :armsup:

but yea, economy doesnt change.. 10.9L/100km's - im very happy with that :D
just beat a Marlin in a swimming race
Posts: 813
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 10:21 pm
Location: Hobart

Post by Spike_Sierra »

with 4.9's, 30's and jimny engine i used to get 9L/100k's
with 6.5's, 33x12.5's and supercharged jimny motor i get 11.5/100
85 LWB w. FRP Canopy
Ca18det conversion in progress, Vit PS, RUF,
6.5:1's, 33x12.5 Bfg's, custom front and rear bars.
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:52 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Post by islandvitara »

Spike_Sierra wrote:with 4.9's, 30's and jimny engine i used to get 9L/100k's
with 6.5's, 33x12.5's and supercharged jimny motor i get 11.5/100
that is really good!! i think anyway :cool:
just beat a Marlin in a swimming race
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:52 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Post by islandvitara »

also can people with the 1.6 carby and efi sierra's post up fuel figures and mods that contribute? just curious as im swapping to a 1.6carby in the near future :cool:
just beat a Marlin in a swimming race
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:52 am
Location: Perth, WA

Post by alien »

1.6 carby got me very similar figures to whats mentioned above... maybe 10km less per tank at best - and i was running a weber 32/36.

Its definitely driving style though - after having a rebuild a few weeks back i had to do the 1000km 'break in' period thing - so babying it essentially - and fuel economy increased a fair bit... like, rather than 230km to a tank (unadjusted for tyres) i was hitting 240ish... +18% for tyres.

It will be difficult - but try for a tank short changing gears a little more and not overtaking people in traffic etc, and take off gently at the lights (drive it like your granny would). It will amaze you the difference it makes.

Best i ever got out of 30L was 430km once - running g13a (carby) and 215/75r15 with extractors and exhaust work - long country drive doing no more than 80km/hr and not doing any overtaking. i was VERY impressed. Then i drove home like a hooligan and got 300 to the 30L =P haha
The worst thing about censorship is ███████.
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 3:27 pm
Location: kerang vic

Post by PigDog »

worst I got with 29'' tyres and a 2'' lift on my 1.3 96 coily soft top was just under 20lt to do 100km all the way home from sydney. but slaped a diff carby on it and got 8 km to the 100km at 90km a hour on the flat. doing county k's last week
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 6:10 pm
Location: Brisbane QLD

Post by Mitchie »

i have a 1.6 efi and i did 210km to 19L (used a gps to measure) on 235/75/15 atr's so that's about 11km to the litre so thats about 9l to the 100km
Posts: 977
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 7:57 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by Gutless »

1.6 EFI in sierra with 30.5's. 4.11 diffs, 1 litre transfer.

750km from 65L

Its a ute BTW with alloy tray, steel ARB bar. Weighs in about 1080kg with me and 80L fuel.
[url]www.twinstickoffroad.com[/url]
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:52 am
Location: Perth, WA

Post by alien »

Gutless - thats brilliant economy! mines 1050kg minus me, but with a soft top full of water.

What kind of RPM's are you pulling etc?
The worst thing about censorship is ███████.
Posts: 977
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 7:57 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by Gutless »

alien wrote:Gutless - thats brilliant economy! mines 1050kg minus me, but with a soft top full of water.

What kind of RPM's are you pulling etc?
dunno :D

I have a 1L dash, so no tacho :D

I'll fit one oneday :roll:
[url]www.twinstickoffroad.com[/url]
Posts: 112
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:43 pm
Location: perth, Australia

Post by shandy »

vitara 1.6 efi with 235/75/15 (29") i get around 350ks (not adjusted for tyres) to a tank but i havnt let it go empty, i always refill just less than a 1/4 of a tank.

RPM, these speeds are not what the speedo reads but the actual speed of the car(roughly).
70ks- 5th= 2100rpm
80ks- 5th= 2700rpm
100ks- 5th= 3100rpm
110ks- 5th= 3600rpm

Mitch
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:07 pm
Location: Adelaide

Post by flickaz »

Ive got a turbo GTI running 235/75/15's and 4.16 reduction and I get around 380km on 30L's. So that works out to about 8l/100kms, and yes my tank is dented too!! lol. im doing roughly 3700rpm @ 110km/hr
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:52 am
Location: Perth, WA

Post by alien »

amazing the difference more lift and larger tyres makes - we're all in roughly the same band of RPMs!
The worst thing about censorship is ███████.
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:52 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast

Post by islandvitara »

alien wrote:amazing the difference more lift and larger tyres makes - we're all in roughly the same band of RPMs!
my sierra is i need of a 1.6, i can get hold of a carby 1.6 which is why i wanted to know fuel figures...revs should be different to the 1.3 huh? possibly less at the same speeds i mentioned yeah? :D
just beat a Marlin in a swimming race
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests