Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

which one first ?

Tech Talk for Nissan owners.

Moderators: toaddog, V8Patrol

Post Reply
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:49 pm
Location: ipswich

which one first ?

Post by gqmudder91 »

hello i own a 93 ford mavrick ute and was wandering which one to do first to lift it a leaf ova conversion extended shackles or shocks looking for a 2 to 4 inch lift have not decided yet which ones thanks guys
:D
Posts: 4330
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:06 pm
Location: Central Victoria

Post by coxy321 »

A SOA conversion will net you an instant 4-6 inch lift straight off the bat - but will be quite expensive.

If your pockets aren't deep enough for an SOA conversion, just go springs/shocks/shackles. And remember when you're looking at brands etc. that 99% of the time you will get what you pay for.

Maybe give Shane at Suspension Stuff a call...... ?
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:49 pm
Location: ipswich

Post by gqmudder91 »

stupid question wat is a soa conversion?
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Greenbank

Post by zookimal »

gqmudder91 wrote:stupid question wat is a soa conversion?
Spring Over Axle. Same as what you're calling Leaf Over. Are you intending on keeping QLD rego?
-Mal

Zook 1, 2, 3 gone
Patrol - Wheels, engine and stuff
Posts: 766
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2002 3:08 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by jtraf »

gqmudder91 wrote:stupid question wat is a soa conversion?
SOA = Spring Over Axle
Posts: 1363
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 10:54 am
Location: Scarborough, Qld

Re: which one first ?

Post by bigbluemav »

gqmudder91 wrote:hello i own a 93 ford mavrick ute and was wandering which one to do first to lift it a leaf ova conversion extended shackles or shocks looking for a 2 to 4 inch lift have not decided yet which ones thanks guys
:D
Are you talking about the rear springs (only) being leaves, or front AND rear? I though only the EARLY utes had leaves F & R, whereas leaf rear was an option, with coils std after about 1990.
Big Dave, Scarborough, Qld
Loose Screws 4wd Racing Team
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 7:03 pm
Location: brisbane

Post by Tower »

cant really do shocks until you sort out how high you want to lift it
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:49 pm
Location: ipswich

Post by gqmudder91 »

yer front and rear leaf sprung and yer keeping my qld rego and how hard is to do
Posts: 129
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 4:10 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Post by striga22 »

cheapst way you can do it is make your own shackles and the then get a shock to suit i wouldnt do a spring over because they come very unstable
need some plumbing done? cashies top quality job for cheaper south east melbourne Daniel 0423771198
Posts: 2388
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 10:20 pm
Location: bacabugari

Post by big red »

gqmudder91 wrote:yer front and rear leaf sprung and yer keeping my qld rego and how hard is to do
pretty sure SOA is illegal in Qld
[url=http://bigred.redbubble.com/][color=red][b]You can follow me but its gunna hurt ![/b][/color][/url]
event pics http://bigred.redbubble.com/
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

big red wrote:
gqmudder91 wrote:yer front and rear leaf sprung and yer keeping my qld rego and how hard is to do
pretty sure SOA is illegal in Qld
isnt it illegal everywhere?
Posts: 765
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:28 pm
Location: Fixing something else the kids have broken

Post by BadMav »

Pretty dumb rule when you consider that a hilux is spring over from factory huh??? :roll:
Don't take life too seriously...it isn't permanent.
Posts: 4330
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:06 pm
Location: Central Victoria

Post by coxy321 »

BadMav wrote:Pretty dumb rule when you consider that a hilux is spring over from factory huh??? :roll:
Ummm.... not really. Its FACTORY fitment/design, ie. lots of R&D, plus all of the driveline and suspension is built and tested to suit. Hilux's are also a completely different beast compared to either MQ/MK/GQ Patrols.
Posts: 765
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:28 pm
Location: Fixing something else the kids have broken

Post by BadMav »

coxy321 wrote:
BadMav wrote:Pretty dumb rule when you consider that a hilux is spring over from factory huh??? :roll:
Ummm.... not really. Its FACTORY fitment/design, ie. lots of R&D, plus all of the driveline and suspension is built and tested to suit. Hilux's are also a completely different beast compared to either MQ/MK/GQ Patrols.
Fair enough, but I was told by a QLD transport inspector that the reason that they won't allow a SOA conversion is that if there is a failure particularly with the u bolts, the axle is not contained within the confines of the spring and chassis and had nothing to do with the handling of the vehicle.

That's just what HE said, the real reason is probably like you said "research and development".
Don't take life too seriously...it isn't permanent.
Posts: 4330
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:06 pm
Location: Central Victoria

Post by coxy321 »

I know the front diffs have a torque bar, but the rear doesn't. I suppose like most things relating to vehicle modification, the authorities have set rules in place to stop dodgy-arsed clowns bodging up their own SOA conversions. Its not to say that there aren't people out there doing good work (some work i've seen is BETTER than factory), however, they need to have a rule for all to save the heartache.

On a side note, i thought there used to be 2-3 workshops down here that did legit and engineered SOA's a few years back.
Posts: 489
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 11:36 pm
Location: pinerivers

Re: which one first ?

Post by gut42 »

bigbluemav wrote:
gqmudder91 wrote:hello i own a 93 ford mavrick ute and was wandering which one to do first to lift it a leaf ova conversion extended shackles or shocks looking for a 2 to 4 inch lift have not decided yet which ones thanks guys
:D
Are you talking about the rear springs (only) being leaves, or front AND rear? I though only the EARLY utes had leaves F & R, whereas leaf rear was an option, with coils std after about 1990.
Pretty sure coils did come in utes till bout 94 on.
i got nothin
Posts: 1857
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:16 am
Location: ipswich

Post by nastytroll »

My coil cab is dec 1992. I think the change was either end of 1991 or end of 1992. I used to have problems getting parts through nissan because they said it was leaf, until this FAST system came in.

I would price up a coiled rolling chassis before playing with leaves. Leaf springs them selves are expensive compared to coils and the mods to get leaves to work make them expensive too.

A coil rolling chassis can be bought cheap these days and give you all the core components for what you want to acheive with the added benefiet of comfort.
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:49 pm
Location: ipswich

Post by gqmudder91 »

yer but how hard is it to do dont have a lot of money
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:49 pm
Location: ipswich

Post by gqmudder91 »

yer but how hard is it to do dont have a lot of money
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests