Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user. If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
Shadow wrote:could you not make the studs like factory ones, ie, press in? would save some machining on the threads
or actually, are the marks in the stud holes just scores from being bored ? D:
yes but then you have the price difrence between the nut and a stud,
also a stud is mroe readly avalible from an engineering shop if your break one as apposed to a stud and easy to change
R.A.G, Ruff As Gutts 4x4 club :P
http://www.rag4x4.com/
I always though much of the strength in the wheel/hub interface came from friction between wheel/hub - the job of the studs being to force the surfaces together rather than take up the full force of the union (i.e. the studs should be only under tensile stress, not shear and/or bending). In this case you're cutting down on the contact area between the wheel and hub, hence reducing friction between wheel and hub - putting more load on the studs themselves.
What sort of bolt will you be supplying with the spacers and will it have the correct taper to suit individual vehicals?
But they sure look cool and it's possible i have no idea what i'm talking about.
You would increase the pressure on the contact area - and some mags and steelies have about 30-40% of the contact area actually in contact anyway. Should still be alright...
ferog wrote:I've had worse smelling fingers though.
1. Stiffness. You've cut away so much metal that there's no direct load path any more.
2. Fatigue life. You've got a lot of internal sharp corners for fatigue cracks to start at.
3. Stud insertion depth. It looks like you're down to 1x thread depth.
4. Wheel centring boss. These take care of any overload, especially if nuts work loose. I don't see any on your spacers.
Have you got an engineer to do any stress testing on these?
What is the weight saving? and in the scheme of things does it really make much difference saving ? (1kg ?) per wheel when your bead locked 37'' tyre weighs ~60-70kg per corner and your racing at comparably low speeds.
The Silver Bullet - BJ74
Where the actions at Ontrack 4wd Club
http://www.ontrack4wdclub.com/
[url]http://www.cams.com.au/[/url]
hmm interesting design, you done any FEA on it ? I think if you do you will be seeing some red .....
As others have said you may want to looking into the depth of your stud holes and what length kneeling you will have to deal with, looks pretty shallow.
Does this very thin bit of steel (marked in arrows) really add much strength to the whole set up? The reason I ask is that if I picture the same item with that very thin-walled part removed, it starts to seem a bit iffy in terms of the amount of steel going from the old studs to the new studs. Especially when you look at the "inside" image, those thin-walled bits create an impression that the overall structure is really robust, but it is an illusion if those thin bits are really just sort of leftover metal and don't add strength.
It's a genuine question, I am not bagging the item I am just wondering. I guess the best test would be to thrash the shit out of them in the wild on a heavy 4WD
Nice job, but I would definitely be going with press fit studs I think........ I dont trust threaded studs in this app, due to the chance loose wheel nuts rocking the stud around and wearing the threads....... just feel safer with a big stud head having to pull through the hub to get free.
It would be a simple mod though....definitely like the idea os less unsprung weight.
chimpboy wrote:I am no engineer, so I am just asking...
Does this very thin bit of steel (marked in arrows) really add much strength to the whole set up? The reason I ask is that if I picture the same item with that very thin-walled part removed, it starts to seem a bit iffy in terms of the amount of steel going from the old studs to the new studs. Especially when you look at the "inside" image, those thin-walled bits create an impression that the overall structure is really robust, but it is an illusion if those thin bits are really just sort of leftover metal and don't add strength.
It's a genuine question, I am not bagging the item I am just wondering. I guess the best test would be to thrash the shit out of them in the wild on a heavy 4WD
My uneducated guess is it will stop alot of flex if left there and not removed.
Grab a bit of paper, sit something on top with it flat.
put a small curve on the same piece of paper and it has a better chance of supporting said object.
Harb wrote:Nice job, but I would definitely be going with press fit studs I think........ I dont trust threaded studs in this app, due to the chance loose wheel nuts rocking the stud around and wearing the threads....... just feel safer with a big stud head having to pull through the hub to get free.
It would be a simple mod though....definitely like the idea os less unsprung weight.
why not use cap screw screwed in from the back? then they are threaded in and have a large head to pull through
RN wrote:pussy is out, its the log for me... Thank you Jesus.