My g/f parents are looking at buying a Diesel Pajero to tow their 18Ft Jayco.
They are looking at spending around $35k and are interested in this one below purely because its close to their house and they know someone at that dealer.
Can anyone tell me if that front end is at all factory. They told them it was a sports model of some sort. I think it's very ugly!! But does have low km.
Thanks in advance
http://www.carsales.com.au/dealer/detai ... 00,40000~1
PS: I personally never buy from dealers as have had a few bad experiences with lies and so on.
Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
2006 Pajero
Moderator: -Scott-
2006 Pajero
GQII Patrol YAY!!
Re: 2006 Pajero
Yeah, that is the VR-X front for the NP Pajero. Looks Grimace if ya ask me!
Re: 2006 Pajero
Hi, Jimbo,
You never said a truer word, they should be taken outside and strung up, then kicked to death, SLOWLY, LOL.
Just had a look at the link and see its gone, so I take it they bought it and I bet its the 2.8 model too, they are crap, IMHO, because of the heads on these 2.8's, but there you go.
You never said a truer word, they should be taken outside and strung up, then kicked to death, SLOWLY, LOL.
Just had a look at the link and see its gone, so I take it they bought it and I bet its the 2.8 model too, they are crap, IMHO, because of the heads on these 2.8's, but there you go.
Re: 2006 Pajero
being the VRX "sporty" model i doubt it would be the 2.8
as for ugly, meh, still better than twin winches and HT tyres...
as for ugly, meh, still better than twin winches and HT tyres...
mike_nofx wrote:Is "Athol" what people with a lisp call him??
RAY185 wrote:I think it's delightful! So does my wife Bill.
Re: 2006 Pajero
It is most unlikely that it is a 2.8 L engine. The NM series was the last to use this engine. A 2006 may evenbe a common rail 3.2 L engine. Whatever, they are apparently a reliable, if noisy, engine which pulls like a steam train.
Re: 2006 Pajero
the 3.2 did is a great oiler .. durable and plenty of grunt .. and easy to mod for evem more if needed ( can pretty easily get em to well +400nm of torque ) My dad test drove one with his 2.4 tonne boat\trailer on it and loved it.date wrote:It is most unlikely that it is a 2.8 L engine. The NM series was the last to use this engine. A 2006 may evenbe a common rail 3.2 L engine. Whatever, they are apparently a reliable, if noisy, engine which pulls like a steam train.
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Re: 2006 Pajero
By 2006 they were definitely into the 3.2 DiD, but I don't think the common rail made it into NP.date wrote:It is most unlikely that it is a 2.8 L engine. The NM series was the last to use this engine. A 2006 may evenbe a common rail 3.2 L engine. Whatever, they are apparently a reliable, if noisy, engine which pulls like a steam train.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests