Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
2007 Defender Styling
Moderator: Micka
I like the styling... but not the engine options... who really wants a french turbo diesel engine?
Message content not approved for consumption by children or easily damaged psyches. If accidentally exposed, flush eyes with cold water and induce vomiting. If irritation persists, sit quietly and watch SBS.
Sketchpad: Land Rover Defender
The best defense is a good offense
By Editors of Motor Trend
Photography by Mark Stehrenberger
Motor Trend, July 2004
The Defender, absent from this market since after the 1997 model year, returns to the United States in 2007 as a 2008 model. It retains its image as the purest, most committed sport/utility in Land Rover's lineup, although a smaller, more basic model reportedly is in the works for introduction a year later.
Land Rover is keen on cultivating the no-nonsense image of the Defender, which evokes the original postwar model made famous by the film "Born Free" and by the United Nations peacekeeping forces (before the Toyota Land Cruiser grabbed that market). The new model will remain functional and classic in design, but is expected to be a bit softer for the fun-seeking, less-affluent members of the youth market.
Now under Ford Motor Co.'s wings, the next Defender will be built with a new, modern body design on a steel frame. Short-wheelbase, long-wheelbase, and soft-top versions are in the works, although not all might be bound for North America. Gasoline engines will come from Ford: a direct-injection four with variable timing, a 3.0-liter Duratec V-6, and for the U.S. only, a 3.8-liter V-6. Peugeot will supply a 2.7-liter turbodiesel V-6 for Europe.
The best defense is a good offense
By Editors of Motor Trend
Photography by Mark Stehrenberger
Motor Trend, July 2004
The Defender, absent from this market since after the 1997 model year, returns to the United States in 2007 as a 2008 model. It retains its image as the purest, most committed sport/utility in Land Rover's lineup, although a smaller, more basic model reportedly is in the works for introduction a year later.
Land Rover is keen on cultivating the no-nonsense image of the Defender, which evokes the original postwar model made famous by the film "Born Free" and by the United Nations peacekeeping forces (before the Toyota Land Cruiser grabbed that market). The new model will remain functional and classic in design, but is expected to be a bit softer for the fun-seeking, less-affluent members of the youth market.
Now under Ford Motor Co.'s wings, the next Defender will be built with a new, modern body design on a steel frame. Short-wheelbase, long-wheelbase, and soft-top versions are in the works, although not all might be bound for North America. Gasoline engines will come from Ford: a direct-injection four with variable timing, a 3.0-liter Duratec V-6, and for the U.S. only, a 3.8-liter V-6. Peugeot will supply a 2.7-liter turbodiesel V-6 for Europe.
G'day all,
I like it too, infact I would be happy if ford was to build it like in the pictures, but the pictures are probably more defender looking than what the real release vehicle will be. It seems to be a trend, nice artist pic and then they change it abit more and it looks totally different.
I just hope that red one is 100" with dyna diffs (I heard that ford struck a deal to fit them in the new disco, anyone else know??) and a nice V6 turbo diesel (even better if it was mechanically injected but that EVER going to happen). paint it green and I would get one
I can dream atleast
NB: that front bar better be metal ....
I like it too, infact I would be happy if ford was to build it like in the pictures, but the pictures are probably more defender looking than what the real release vehicle will be. It seems to be a trend, nice artist pic and then they change it abit more and it looks totally different.
I just hope that red one is 100" with dyna diffs (I heard that ford struck a deal to fit them in the new disco, anyone else know??) and a nice V6 turbo diesel (even better if it was mechanically injected but that EVER going to happen). paint it green and I would get one
I can dream atleast
NB: that front bar better be metal ....
[i]DAS[/i]
MY05 4.4L V8 Range Rover Vogue
Series 2a Buggy....In the Building
MY05 4.4L V8 Range Rover Vogue
Series 2a Buggy....In the Building
DAS wrote:I just hope that red one is 100" with dyna diffs (I heard that ford struck a deal to fit them in the new disco, anyone else know??)
Do you mean Dana diffs? Or Dyna diffs as in toyota Dyna truck?
I don't mind the shape but it would need to have a strong chassis like the current one, an aluminium body, and strong solid axles front and rear (Dana 60's would be best but 30 spline Dana 44's would be acceptable). Somehow I doubt all of this will be fitted.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Yeah, I wouldn't put too much blame on Ford or Bmw either. The market sector that the RangeRover and Disco appeal to, meant that developement was always going to head in the direction it has, but the rot began to set in with Defenders with the introduction of the 300TDi.
ie, smaller cv's, closely spaced wheel bearings, shorter halshaft and drive flange splines, smaller propshaft universals, pissweak clutch release forks,
poorer control over the manufacturing quality on the LT230 T/case.
Poor corrosion protection of all the steel body/chassis components, removal of most of the stiffening ribs and braces on the roof panel ,sides and other bodywork, downgraded material quality on even the already pissweak Rover diffs, Need I go on? and all this happened under Rover ownership, before BMW or Ford.
Bill.
ie, smaller cv's, closely spaced wheel bearings, shorter halshaft and drive flange splines, smaller propshaft universals, pissweak clutch release forks,
poorer control over the manufacturing quality on the LT230 T/case.
Poor corrosion protection of all the steel body/chassis components, removal of most of the stiffening ribs and braces on the roof panel ,sides and other bodywork, downgraded material quality on even the already pissweak Rover diffs, Need I go on? and all this happened under Rover ownership, before BMW or Ford.
Bill.
landrover, that is the landrover ie. s11, s111 and the 90/110/defender has always sufered at the hands of others. in the 70's when the british leyland group was formed, all the products turning a profit subsidized the ones turning a loss. this ment no funds for R&D. so thats why they fell way behind the times and could never catch up. they basic concept is very good as is seen buy the varying customers. As the vehilce stands stock and for what the design is ment for i.e only 750-16 tyres, etc, it isn't to bad. there must be a large market place for this type of vehicle with the ability for it to have air bags ,etc, for N.A. but a lower tech version for other countries. surely these vehicles still don't have to be hand built and they can improve on the idea with some details taken from the fact that it hasn't changed for so long and we all have the same problems with them. any ideas what we can do about it. theres no point bitching to one another if the nobs at ford/rover don't hear about it.
serg
serg
Serg, I don't buy the excuse about being starved for funds as the reason for degrading the design of mechanical componentry. Once a particular component design has been in production, axles, spindles propshafts etc, it costs far more money to redesign and downgrade those components than just continuing production of the old design. A small universal joint for example, doesn't cost any less to make than a larger one. The Rover company has always had more than it's fair share of incompetent engineers in my opinion, but there is something a bit sinister about the way they stuffed the Defender range.
Bill.
Bill.
In my opinion and many others who know landRovers well, The 1985 110 with the Isuzu 4bd1 desel engine and LT95 4 speed gearbox is the best. Buy a good one ,Fit Maxidrive or Macnightmara strengthened front end components and difflocks, a bullbar ,full rollcage and electronic rust proofing ,maintain it well and you will have one of the safest, most capable, durable and longest lasting 4x4's built.
Bill.
Bill.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests