Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

2007 Defender Styling

Tech Talk for Rover owners.

Moderator: Micka

Posts: 11892
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:53 am
Location: Melbourne

2007 Defender Styling

Post by N*A*M »

Posts: 680
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Earlwood, Sydney

Post by ShinyDiscoBalls »

I like the styling... but not the engine options... who really wants a french turbo diesel engine?
Message content not approved for consumption by children or easily damaged psyches. If accidentally exposed, flush eyes with cold water and induce vomiting. If irritation persists, sit quietly and watch SBS.
Posts: 2732
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:50 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Post by stuee »

I like the styling also, the engines seem better than TD5 currently available.

but is expected to be a bit softer for the fun-seeking, less-affluent members of the youth market


Don't like the sounds of that. Does it mean landrover is going to a full soft-roader line-up? :cry:
Posts: 1285
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 8:22 pm
Location: gold coast

Post by uninformed »

they will never do it right BUT by the sounds of it, it will still have a chassis and not monocoque body/chassis. the new ford/peugot engines are ment to be pretty good. though they will be tech. ie electrics
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 12:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Hardtop_110 »

Jesus!!!

Yhat thing is awful!!!

I thought Ford would fuck things up sooner or later.
Daryl Snowdon
Melbourne Australia
1954 86" Series 1 Hardtop - 'under construction'
1993 110" Defender Hardtop
User avatar
Pup
Posts: 553
Joined: Mon May 17, 2004 2:25 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by Pup »

the link not working for anyone else? been trying to get to it all night but it saying page cant be found
Posts: 11892
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:53 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by N*A*M »

Sketchpad: Land Rover Defender
The best defense is a good offense

By Editors of Motor Trend
Photography by Mark Stehrenberger
Motor Trend, July 2004

The Defender, absent from this market since after the 1997 model year, returns to the United States in 2007 as a 2008 model. It retains its image as the purest, most committed sport/utility in Land Rover's lineup, although a smaller, more basic model reportedly is in the works for introduction a year later.

Land Rover is keen on cultivating the no-nonsense image of the Defender, which evokes the original postwar model made famous by the film "Born Free" and by the United Nations peacekeeping forces (before the Toyota Land Cruiser grabbed that market). The new model will remain functional and classic in design, but is expected to be a bit softer for the fun-seeking, less-affluent members of the youth market.

Now under Ford Motor Co.'s wings, the next Defender will be built with a new, modern body design on a steel frame. Short-wheelbase, long-wheelbase, and soft-top versions are in the works, although not all might be bound for North America. Gasoline engines will come from Ford: a direct-injection four with variable timing, a 3.0-liter Duratec V-6, and for the U.S. only, a 3.8-liter V-6. Peugeot will supply a 2.7-liter turbodiesel V-6 for Europe.
User avatar
Pup
Posts: 553
Joined: Mon May 17, 2004 2:25 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by Pup »

that looks like SHITE, trust ford to go and farck up something which hasnt been changed in decades, it looks more like a ford escape than anything else, the defender look has been around for ages, if it aint broke dont fix it!!!!!!!!!!
Posts: 1128
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 4:29 pm
Location: Brisney Land

Post by Thor »

i like it actually. bout time they updated somewhat at least .
who wants to pay the current $$ which over the last decade has not gone anywhere near the R&D Dept.
Posts: 16934
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 6:57 pm

Post by RUFF »

Looks like someone ran into the back of it in a Disco real fast.
Posts: 683
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 3:42 am
Location: Sydney

Post by GURU »

G'day all,

I like it too, infact I would be happy if ford was to build it like in the pictures, but the pictures are probably more defender looking than what the real release vehicle will be. It seems to be a trend, nice artist pic and then they change it abit more and it looks totally different.

I just hope that red one is 100" with dyna diffs (I heard that ford struck a deal to fit them in the new disco, anyone else know??) and a nice V6 turbo diesel (even better if it was mechanically injected but that EVER going to happen). paint it green and I would get one :)
I can dream atleast

NB: that front bar better be metal .... :?
[i]DAS[/i]
MY05 4.4L V8 Range Rover Vogue
Series 2a Buggy....In the Building
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

DAS wrote:I just hope that red one is 100" with dyna diffs (I heard that ford struck a deal to fit them in the new disco, anyone else know??)


Do you mean Dana diffs? Or Dyna diffs as in toyota Dyna truck?

I don't mind the shape but it would need to have a strong chassis like the current one, an aluminium body, and strong solid axles front and rear (Dana 60's would be best but 30 spline Dana 44's would be acceptable). Somehow I doubt all of this will be fitted.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 135
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2003 4:20 pm
Location: NZ

Post by lowbox »

That looks like a Freelander to me, looks like a nice soft roader but I think 110's may turn into collectors items because that thing ain't no Defender!
ct
Posts: 683
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 3:42 am
Location: Sydney

Post by GURU »

Yes I meant Dana diffs, I must have been a tired when i typed that
[i]DAS[/i]
MY05 4.4L V8 Range Rover Vogue
Series 2a Buggy....In the Building
Posts: 207
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 8:45 am
Location: Over there

Post by Bodge »

Queer Eye for the Defender Guy
The Lucas motto: "Get home before dark."
Posts: 16934
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 6:57 pm

Post by RUFF »

Dana Diffs have been used by Rover for years so its only natural to continue using them. The salisbury is a Dana as are the diffs fitted to P38 Rangies.
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 7:29 pm

Post by daddylonglegs »

It is about time somebody addressed the diff issue. I think Rover is the only company in the world to still use spiral bevel diffs on anything. Even the Russians went over to Hypoid a decade ago. Spiral Bevel was an obsolete design 50 years ago.
Bill.
Posts: 16934
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 6:57 pm

Post by RUFF »

Sorry i realised later today that the P38 doesnt run the Dana.
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 11:51 am
Location: Wollongong, NSW, Australia

Post by brendo »

OMFG!!!! Thats the biggest pile sh*t i have ever scene
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 9:20 am
Location: Kambalda, Western Australia.

New Defy

Post by Craig E »

Ahhhhh NO. Its a Hummer wannabe. Stay with the typical shape, just update the interior to make it semi comfortable and give some legroom.
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 7:29 pm

Post by daddylonglegs »

They may as well killoff the defender series. Rover have destroyed any credibility that the working LandRover range may have still had with the last Defender rehash, update, stuffup !!!.
bill.
Posts: 1614
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:44 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by landy_man »

too true Bill.... the Defender Extreme(ly badly built) does not even have a Sals. rear anymore.... It's only redeeming feature :roll: :roll:
Mine was an absolute pile of sh1t and I will never buy a new Solihull product again
Posts: 10984
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 3:47 pm
Location: Bum drilling with my buddy Ray!

Post by GRIMACE »

its a shame to see what was a good vehicle fade away :cry:

The rangie was killed long ago, know the disco is goin all out independant and no centre diff lock and the last standing bull has been shot dead..... why ow why has land rover gone down this path :cry:
Posts: 1614
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:44 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by landy_man »

AnthonyP wrote:why ow why has land rover gone down this path :cry:


it all boils down to the ALMIGHTY DOLLAR and that entails selling the car in the USA... which means airbags and more modern styling and better ergonomics
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 7:29 pm

Post by daddylonglegs »

Yeah, I wouldn't put too much blame on Ford or Bmw either. The market sector that the RangeRover and Disco appeal to, meant that developement was always going to head in the direction it has, but the rot began to set in with Defenders with the introduction of the 300TDi.
ie, smaller cv's, closely spaced wheel bearings, shorter halshaft and drive flange splines, smaller propshaft universals, pissweak clutch release forks,
poorer control over the manufacturing quality on the LT230 T/case.
Poor corrosion protection of all the steel body/chassis components, removal of most of the stiffening ribs and braces on the roof panel ,sides and other bodywork, downgraded material quality on even the already pissweak Rover diffs, Need I go on? and all this happened under Rover ownership, before BMW or Ford.
Bill.
Posts: 1285
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 8:22 pm
Location: gold coast

Post by uninformed »

landrover, that is the landrover ie. s11, s111 and the 90/110/defender has always sufered at the hands of others. in the 70's when the british leyland group was formed, all the products turning a profit subsidized the ones turning a loss. this ment no funds for R&D. so thats why they fell way behind the times and could never catch up. they basic concept is very good as is seen buy the varying customers. As the vehilce stands stock and for what the design is ment for i.e only 750-16 tyres, etc, it isn't to bad. there must be a large market place for this type of vehicle with the ability for it to have air bags ,etc, for N.A. but a lower tech version for other countries. surely these vehicles still don't have to be hand built and they can improve on the idea with some details taken from the fact that it hasn't changed for so long and we all have the same problems with them. any ideas what we can do about it. theres no point bitching to one another if the nobs at ford/rover don't hear about it.

serg
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 7:29 pm

Post by daddylonglegs »

Serg, I don't buy the excuse about being starved for funds as the reason for degrading the design of mechanical componentry. Once a particular component design has been in production, axles, spindles propshafts etc, it costs far more money to redesign and downgrade those components than just continuing production of the old design. A small universal joint for example, doesn't cost any less to make than a larger one. The Rover company has always had more than it's fair share of incompetent engineers in my opinion, but there is something a bit sinister about the way they stuffed the Defender range.
Bill.
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 1:02 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by DaveG »

Given that many people think the Defender has lost some of its edge over recent years, which do you reckon the best year models are?
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 1:02 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by DaveG »

Given that many people think the Defender has lost some of its edge over recent years, which do you reckon the best year models are?
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 7:29 pm

Post by daddylonglegs »

In my opinion and many others who know landRovers well, The 1985 110 with the Isuzu 4bd1 desel engine and LT95 4 speed gearbox is the best. Buy a good one ,Fit Maxidrive or Macnightmara strengthened front end components and difflocks, a bullbar ,full rollcage and electronic rust proofing ,maintain it well and you will have one of the safest, most capable, durable and longest lasting 4x4's built.
Bill.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests