Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Discussion on Engineering and Tuff Truck

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Posts: 1040
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2002 11:15 am
Location: sydney

Post by planb »

this is the stupidest thread

everyone getting their noses out of joint, but no one actually knows the facts

all this ass talking does no one any good.
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:43 am
Location: Wangaratta

Post by Guy »

planb wrote:all this ass talking does no one any good.


Nor does sweeping it under the carpet ...
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Posts: 1040
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2002 11:15 am
Location: sydney

Post by planb »

can someone move this thread to ass chat ?
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by DeWsE »

planb wrote:can someone move this thread to ass chat ?


Dude if it puts you out why read it...

IMO it's tupid, but some people want to know more
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Posts: 1606
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:20 pm
Location: Geelong

Post by HSV Rangie »

discussion on this topic should not stress out anyone.

If you dont like the topic dont read it.

Many are just asking for clarification (still not forth coming)


from Heath GQ
Okay, so this is my intrepretation - the vehicles must be registered to be allowed to compete. But they dont have to be in a registered condition to actually compete in the event.

strange but probaly true.

as long as no one is expecting third party insurance tocoaver anything all should be OK.

Michael.
Mitsubishi 2010 NT DID Pajero wagon, Factory rear diff lock, Dual batteries, ARB bar, winch, Mt ATZ 4 rib tyres.
1986 RR.
Custom suspension links etc.
HSV 215 engine.
4.3 diffs.
Posts: 4494
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 9:51 pm
Location: Golden Square

Post by turps »

SO the rule say it must be rigistered and enginneered in th estat it is registerd. This is how I percieve, it as has been posted here.

But the bit I am concernd about is the fair play. As some people will be really stretching there engineering alot. Why isnt there a note to the rules saying that the vehicle does not have to meet rule for tyre size or type (same for wheels). And all the other that people appear to be flaunting.

Also from what I have read here. Some people are not concerned with some part of the rules. But what about the bloke who follows the rule as they are written. Why should he be penalised for following the book.

As for insurance, I am going and I belive that I will be covered if I am injuryd I dont see the problem there. As for competitors there should be no concern there if there cages are built right.
They only people that I see that are likly to get hurt are marshalls standing to close to the track. When a competitor tries to drive an opstacle at full noise. And stuffs up (and this happens. All the winch events I have been to someone has done that and gone off the track).
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY....
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 7:29 pm

Post by daddylonglegs »

Well I am personally done with this thread. I and a few others have raised some issues that should have been thrashed out at the first TTC a few years ago. Definitive answers were not forthcoming on this thread but I have received private correspondence from who I am not at Liberty to disclose, that satisfies me to a reasonable degree that whilst the promoters of TTC may be guilty of bullshit with their advertising re ''The Tuffest Registered Trucks '' etc, the insurance cover for the event is above board and valid. Perhaps next year to avoid similar controversy they will cut the ''registered ''crap, call a spade a spade and promote the event for what it really is.
In the interest of peace and harmony within the 4wd fraternity, I have no personal objection if the moderators and other board members agree to delete this entire thread.
Good luck and have an enjoyable weekend to all competitors and spectators alike.
Bill.
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

Top work Bill! :armsup:

Somebody bring the win back to Queensland! :D
User avatar
POS
Posts: 4318
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 8:52 pm
Location: Perth

Post by POS »

NJ SWB wrote:Top work Bill! :armsup:

Somebody bring the win back to Queensland! :D


Its never been here to "Bring Back"!!!! :)
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

POS wrote:
NJ SWB wrote:Top work Bill! :armsup:

Somebody bring the win back to Queensland! :D


Its never been here to "Bring Back"!!!! :)


Sorry - my bad.

Bring the win to Queensland? :D
Posts: 1084
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Aotearoa

Post by J Top »

Bill and Scott
I can see clearly what points you are raising and feel it is a pity others had to become emotional and defamatory towards anyone who doesn't see the world through the same rose coloured glasses as themselves.
We all want events like this to proceed as it will lift the level of both the sport, and the vehicles, and a rising tide raises all ships, BUT, common sense questions are surely allowed to be asked.
J Top
Posts: 4065
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 8:31 am
Location: ACT

Post by Wendle »

funny that everyone is complaining. the lack of enforcement on the paperwork side is only going to make for a better comp. last tuff truck one of the jeep guys from sydney wasn't allowed to compete because the latest revision of his engineering paperwork wasn't listed on the rego papers, pretty stupid really. this year you can just register a truck, build it into whatever you desire it to be, and race it. and that's how it should be.
Posts: 1544
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Performing booty fab in my Garage

Post by Wooders »

Daddy longlegs - even in your supposedly last comment on the topic - you still call it Bullshit. That's part of what peeved me off.
The advertising says registered trucks, they are asking for rego sickers - The advertising doesn't say tuffest engineered trucks and aking for engineering papers....for frigs sake I just can't see what your problem is :roll:
Cheers [url=http://www.wooders.com.au]Wooders[/url]
Posts: 2732
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:50 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Post by stuee »

Wooders wrote:Daddy longlegs - even in your supposedly last comment on the topic - you still call it Bullshit. That's part of what peeved me off.
The advertising says registered trucks, they are asking for rego sickers - The advertising doesn't say tuffest engineered trucks and aking for engineering papers....for frigs sake I just can't see what your problem is :roll:


But for a vehicle to legally wear a rego sticker it must be engineered for the requirements of that state. By saying the truck must have a rego sticker it is implying that the truck is legally registered and engineered. At least thats my view of the situation and might be bills view?? I think poeple are still stressing out far to much over this.

I've always viewed tuff trucks in the same light as v8 supercars. That is they are based on the original vehicle and modified, while still retaining the appearance of the original vehicle. If you look at how successfully this has helped the local v8 commo and falcon scene grow you might take the opinion that this could be benificial to the 4x4 scene aswell.

The real question that needs to be answered is when is WA going to get some high profile 4x4 events :finger: :finger: :D
Posts: 5457
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 9:49 am
Location: Sydney

Post by Shorty40 »

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz :sleeping:
Posts: 2732
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:50 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Post by stuee »

Shorty40 wrote:zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz :sleeping:


yeh I supose. Its getting that way isn't it :lol:
Posts: 4323
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2002 8:42 am
Location: Gold Coast, Queensland

Post by HeathGQ »

stuee wrote:The real question that needs to be answered is when is WA going to get some high profile 4x4 events :finger: :finger: :D
When someone puts there hand and goes 'I'll do it, who wants to help'
Heath & Melissa - 93 GQ LWB.
Posts: 6029
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 9:34 pm
Location: South Australia

Post by bad_religion_au »

just an idea

as tuff truck keeps the road registered law to stop it becoming bling buggy 2006, because apparently that's what the punters want, well it shouldn't matter, as it's the punters that vote in the compeditors
Spit my last breath
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

bad_religion_au wrote:just an idea

as tuff truck keeps the road registered law to stop it becoming bling buggy 2006, because apparently that's what the punters want, well it shouldn't matter, as it's the punters that vote in the compeditors
Why dredge all this up again...

In the last tuff truck, anyone who entered made it in, so your theory wouldn't work.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 114 guests