Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

UROC

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Forum rules
Post Reply
Posts: 1040
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2002 11:15 am
Location: sydney

UROC

Post by planb »

check this machine out

i like it
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Top
Posts: 13555
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by grimbo »

I can't see it working well. The front section from what I can gather is solid mounted with no articulation whilst the rear provides all thhe flex. It just seems that it would fall over the minute it flexes even moderatley on a side angle.

Or I could be wrong :D
Ransom note = demand + collage
Top
Posts: 5457
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 9:49 am
Location: Sydney

Post by Shorty40 »

Someone couldn't decide between Air shocks or coliovers :roll: :lol:
Top
Posts: 876
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:30 pm
Location: Terrigal, NSW

Post by fightara »

grimbo wrote:I can't see it working well. The front section from what I can gather is solid mounted with no articulation whilst the rear provides all thhe flex. It just seems that it would fall over the minute it flexes even moderatley on a side angle.

Or I could be wrong :D


It looks to me like a central articulation system, like with the Steiger-style tractors (though they're also central steer - not sure if this buggy is).

Obviously a tractor is a lot heavier (with low weight) than a buggy, hence less propensity to roll, but we used to have a gully on our farm that could be negotiated only by making use of the "pivot" flex. Scary angles though...
Top
Posts: 1041
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 1:09 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria

Post by Mudzuki »

Nice tube work, but not my cup of tea
Top
Posts: 1403
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 7:59 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by DaveS3 »

grimbo wrote:The front section from what I can gather is solid mounted with no articulation whilst the rear provides all thhe flex.

Or I could be wrong :D


It couldn't be solid mounted could it?
Its probably IFS :roll:

Dave :D
Land Rover Discovery - GQ conversion underway
Top
Posts: 9393
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 11:51 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by antt »

it is solid mounted in the front, there was a thread on pirate about it, i'll try to find it
Top
Posts: 9393
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 11:51 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by antt »

http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthre ... suspension
Top
Posts: 1403
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 7:59 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by DaveS3 »

Nice. Thanks Antt
Land Rover Discovery - GQ conversion underway
Top
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by DeWsE »

Some really cool info their.

At first I thought the thread was a complete "design" bash, but it turned a little to talk actual tech

Nice
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Top
Posts: 2877
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 9:46 pm
Location: Goodna QLD

Post by ludacris »

Awsome rig.

LudaCris
Cris's 4 X 4 Accessories & Suspension 0404 736 325 Rock Sliders From $499
Top
Posts: 1040
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2002 11:15 am
Location: sydney

Post by planb »

:cool:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Top
User avatar
POS
Posts: 4318
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 8:52 pm
Location: Perth

Post by POS »

Ugly if you ask me!

Can't see it working, and it did't work that great on its first comp. Considering that "tiny" started cleaning the events right from day one and now moon buggy's dominate the scene with the odd twin seater causing a stir every now and then!

In my opinion there are some moon buggy's out there at the moment that are 1000 times better in every characteristics, from design to function!

This reminds me of that stupid "Chain Drive" pile of cr@p, where is it now?? :roll: :roll:
Top
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 6:38 pm
Location: Castle Hill, Sydney

Post by 40 lover »

got departure angle??
DRIVE IT HARD, TOW IT HOME
Top
User avatar
POS
Posts: 4318
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 8:52 pm
Location: Perth

Post by POS »

MMMmmmm AWESOME!
:lol: :lol:

http://www.pirate4x4.com/gallery/urocsa ... 5_day1/aoy
Top
Posts: 9393
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 11:51 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by antt »



:rofl:
Top
User avatar
ToNkA
The Haggler!
Posts: 6651
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 8:48 pm

Post by ToNkA »

POS wrote:Ugly if you ask me!

This reminds me of that stupid "Chain Drive" pile of cr@p, where is it now?? :roll: :roll:


Remember Adrian that it takes all these attempts at new designs and the fact that they fail to reinforce the fact that other designs are indeed better. If no one thought outside the box there would be no way of comparing the good and the not so good.

It may not work, but least he had the vision to try.
MY JEEP BUILD
v840 wrote: [Not a shot at Tonka] It's like saying, hell I've got two nuts, I may as well cut one of them off for the hell of it. I ain't using it.[/NAS@T] It's ridiculous!
Top
User avatar
ToNkA
The Haggler!
Posts: 6651
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 8:48 pm

Post by ToNkA »

http://www.pirate4x4.com/albums/urocsal ... y1/aox.jpg
Last edited by ToNkA on Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
MY JEEP BUILD
v840 wrote: [Not a shot at Tonka] It's like saying, hell I've got two nuts, I may as well cut one of them off for the hell of it. I ain't using it.[/NAS@T] It's ridiculous!
Top
User avatar
POS
Posts: 4318
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 8:52 pm
Location: Perth

Post by POS »

ToNkA wrote:
POS wrote:Ugly if you ask me!

This reminds me of that stupid "Chain Drive" pile of cr@p, where is it now?? :roll: :roll:


Remember Adrian that it takes all these attempts at new designs and the fact that they fail to reinforce the fact that other designs are indeed better. If no one thought outside the box there would be no way of comparing the good and the not so good.

It may not work, but least he had the vision to try.


Yes that is true, i know people laughed when the first saw "Tiny".

But its still damn ugly :lol:
Top
Posts: 826
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 4:18 pm
Location: Northern NSW

Post by slosh »

ToNkA wrote:
POS wrote:Ugly if you ask me!

This reminds me of that stupid "Chain Drive" pile of cr@p, where is it now?? :roll: :roll:


Remember Adrian that it takes all these attempts at new designs and the fact that they fail to reinforce the fact that other designs are indeed better. If no one thought outside the box there would be no way of comparing the good and the not so good.

It may not work, but least he had the vision to try.


Exactly. The machines geting around now are only the tip of the iceberg- imagine what progress will have been made in 5 or 10 years from now.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “General Tech”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 104 guests