Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Wheel Base?

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Forum rules
Post Reply
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Wheel Base?

Post by DeWsE »

Wheel base:

Well although I don’t think it will be feasible for me I am wondering what sort of wheel base is suitable for a 35 inch tire on a zook.

So a few questions to discuss would be the tire size people use and wheel base and how they find it.

Also would be good if we had some sort of formula to roughly work from just lift x width… tire by length.

The issue I had with 33’s and a approx 83â€
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Top
Posts: 337
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 10:16 pm
Location: Gympie

Post by small talk »

On my Drover (ute cut) the 32's are on with only extended shackels :shock: so im going to make up plates for the fixed spring mount to drop it and inch and move the front diff forward 1in or so and the rear back at least 2in. Whats a stock swb sierra's wheelbase?? will 3in help much or move them further??
1984 Hilux dualcab.
Top
Posts: 1142
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 6:25 pm
Location: brisbane

Post by largesuzy »

lwb= 93.5inches
swb= 81.5inches
89 lux 2bl 4inch spring 35's etc still slow as a snail
Top
Posts: 813
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 10:21 pm
Location: Hobart

Post by Spike_Sierra »

largesuzy wrote:lwb= 93.5inches
swb= 81.5inches
from drive.com
states
93.5 for LWB
79.9 for SWB :D :D
85 LWB w. FRP Canopy
Ca18det conversion in progress, Vit PS, RUF,
6.5:1's, 33x12.5 Bfg's, custom front and rear bars.
Top
Posts: 1142
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 6:25 pm
Location: brisbane

Post by largesuzy »

Spike_Sierra wrote:
largesuzy wrote:lwb= 93.5inches
swb= 81.5inches
from drive.com
states
93.5 for LWB
79.9 for SWB :D :D
pretty close for straight off the top of my head
89 lux 2bl 4inch spring 35's etc still slow as a snail
Top
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by DeWsE »

Well I have been thinking about a formula, and it would be said that 100â€
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Top
Posts: 5714
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2002 3:55 pm
Location: Perth WA.

Post by nicbeer »

Hmm. seems ok. That being I am running 31's and would want a 90" WB.

How easy is it to get to that figure, without major mods.

cheers
[url=http://www.outerlimits4x4.com/viewtopic.php?p=930942#930942&highlight=]Zook[/url]
U SUK Zook Built and Sold.
New rig is 97 80 DX. 2" list 33s
Top
Posts: 13555
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by grimbo »

1st Flaw: Flaw not floor :D

2nd Flaw: This is suitable for a swb calculation only as it means on a swb with 34's you would need a wb of 79.5 + 16 = 95.5. Yet my LWB has 34s and is already at 93.5 + RUF = approx 94.5 + 16 (as per calculation)=110.5
Ransom note = demand + collage
Top
Posts: 7954
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: Tasmania

Post by DeWsE »

grimbo wrote:1st Flaw: Flaw not floor :D

2nd Flaw: This is suitable for a swb calculation only as it means on a swb with 34's you would need a wb of 79.5 + 16 = 95.5. Yet my LWB has 34s and is already at 93.5 + RUF = approx 94.5 + 16 (as per calculation)=110.5
Yeah sounds right, but I was only looking at stock, not with ruf... as ruf is something you do to extend your wheel base... so your wheel base is 94.5 and according to the formula the desired is 95.5.... I think you have got your rig pretty much spot on. I'm just trying to work out what wheel base is desirable for tire size. So Flaw two just shows that it works.

Flaw 1.... yep your very right!
[quote="STD CONSUMER"]haha, i'm tellin you, my camp was hard to find on Saturday night!
then i shared my bed with 2 second tom... [/quote]
Top
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

for 35's i would want over 96" wb but i wouldnt run 35's:P

im at 104 with the ute on 37's
and i have came real close to goin over backwards :lol: (have video and working on getting it up :) )
but dont think id go longer because of ramp over

chassis height would have a bit to do with it to

mine is 22" to bottom of chassis
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
Top
Posts: 754
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 11:57 am
Location: Tumut, NSW

Post by Barathrum »

I'm at 92' with 35's, 22.5inchs to the chassis rail. I do feel that this is a little short, but that depends what your driving . I've nearly been over backward once aswell. Compared to a hilux on 35's that i drive with all the time his wheel base makes the steep climbs seem so much easier, but his rampover sucks. I've found that for really tight work in creeks and gullys that my wheel base is great. In some cases you can get the whole 4by down into a hole and drive it a lot easier than a longer wheelbase rig who ends up being a lot more crossed up and side angled than what the smaller wheelbase rig is. Also turning circle is better being shorter.

So my conclusion is simple. I'd like just a few more inch's if its too long it might just end up hurting.
Top
Posts: 977
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 7:57 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by Gutless »

[quote="DeWsE"]Well I have been thinking about a formula, and it would be said that 100â€
[url]www.twinstickoffroad.com[/url]
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Suzuki”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests