Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

mud tyre debate

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Post Reply
Posts: 1040
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2002 11:15 am
Location: sydney

mud tyre debate

Post by planb »

what are peoples opinions on which mud tyre type works best

the skinny simex type tyre, that digs down for traction

or the wide bogger type tyre that floats ???
Posts: 2979
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2003 7:03 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by robbie »

I have been told by a few to go for skinnies in the mud, so they dig straight the hard shit
Posts: 13555
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by grimbo »

i like the tall skinny (34 x 9.5 swampers) for victorian conditions it tends to cut thru the goo for traction, cleans well and handles on road as well without putting huge amounts of stress on the drivetrain
Ransom note = demand + collage
Posts: 15549
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:23 am
Location: Your Mummas House!

Post by bj on roids »

it totally depends on your vehicle

for a heavy vehicle you want to sink and get that traction so for a heavy vehicle, your skinnies are the go

for a light vehicle the fatties keep it afloat

for a big horsepower vehicle, cause it can spin up the bigger fats, then thats a go

for a gutless car, dont go anywhere near the mud
hands and mums dont count!!!
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 9:15 pm

Post by BeZeRK »

i like the new dunlop roadgrippers... all the NPWS cars are using them so they must be the bomb! :finger:
Posts: 2296
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 4:30 pm

Post by OVERKILL ENG »



MTR"S
OVERKILL ENGINEERING
www.overkill4x4.com
Posts: 3924
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 10:35 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW

Post by hypo »

bj on roids wrote:it totally depends on your vehicle

for a heavy vehicle you want to sink and get that traction so for a heavy vehicle, your skinnies are the go

for a light vehicle the fatties keep it afloat

for a big horsepower vehicle, cause it can spin up the bigger fats, then thats a go

for a gutless car, dont go anywhere near the mud


dont go near mud at all it sux ar$e
:finger: HYPOFAB :finger:

Thanks to:

Polyperformance
Yuri 4x4
Longfield
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 12:34 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Zookymatt »

grimbo wrote:cut thru the goo for traction


It not only depends on your vehicle but also on the type of mud you're in. Graham makes the point that the tall & skinny's work in Vic because there is a hard base to dig down to. Sydney is a bit of a mixed bag. Some areas nearly always have a hard base, like Menai, whereas some other areas you'll be hitting China before you get any traction. I'm not sure what they have in Queensland, Ruff??

I prefer wider tyres in Sydney from what I've seen work, I've personally never driven on skinny's.

If the NPWS chooses the Roadgrippers, then they must be the best!! Where do I buy some? :lol:

Regards,
Matt.
Posts: 428
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 8:26 am
Location: The Sovereign Nation of Sealabia

Post by 2car »

bj on roids wrote:it totally depends on your vehicle

for a heavy vehicle you want to sink and get that traction so for a heavy vehicle, your skinnies are the go

for a light vehicle the fatties keep it afloat

for a big horsepower vehicle, cause it can spin up the bigger fats, then thats a go

for a gutless car, dont go anywhere near the mud


Australian Poetry at it's best. I can imagine John Laws reading this like it was Banjo Patterson.
74 FJ40, 307, Hilux DBC, 35 Claws, welded rear.

'''_ ______
'/|_[_____]__
|?[_L/-\_|o=o|_
?:__;-?__-,==,_
()_)O()_)O== )_)
Posts: 1544
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Performing booty fab in my Garage

Post by Wooders »

The yanks that are into mud seriously seem to recommend tall skinnies (like Q78 or 38x12.5) usually of the TSL variety for the front and big fats at the back Bogger style......Oh yeah mix plenty of grunt...
Cheers [url=http://www.wooders.com.au]Wooders[/url]
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 6:55 am
Location: Stuck Between a 44 & a 52

Post by onall4 »

Go for a Narrower Tyre for mud thats only about 1 foot deep.
Its all good to be able to cut right down to the bottom for extra traction, But what if it's a bottom less pit then the Skinnies sink much quicker than the wider tyre. Or if the mud is a little deeper than your diff clearance allows, as well as your chassi your fuqked...

I Prefer a bit of floatation (width) especially for the heavier vehicles.

Pete
Posts: 329
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 5:24 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by derangedrover »

onall4 wrote:I Prefer a bit of flirtation (width) especially for the heavier chicks.

Pete

:shock:
Posts: 82
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 6:55 am
Location: Stuck Between a 44 & a 52

Post by onall4 »

derangedrover wrote:
onall4 wrote:I Prefer a bit of flirtation (width) especially for the heavier chicks.

Pete

:shock:


I stand to correct you.

I prefer a liitle extra flotation of the tits, & a little less width of the rear 1/4 panels.
Posts: 365
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 1:38 pm
Location: Brisbane, Nthsider

Post by redrocket »

onall4 wrote:
derangedrover wrote:
onall4 wrote:I Prefer a bit of flirtation (width) especially for the heavier chicks.

Pete

:shock:


I stand to correct you.

I prefer a liitle extra flotation of the tits, & a little less width of the rear 1/4 panels.


:D :D :D :D :D :D :D Dats sum phunni shut.
"If it ain't broken, smash it harder, then make it stronger!"
Posts: 668
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 4:49 pm
Location: Gold Coast

Post by Pesky Pete »

My Humble 20C Worth

I was out wheeling in my 80 series, with two other 80 series and a GQ Patrol. 3 of us were running Wrangler MTR's and one Yoko MTR's. As mine is a newer 80 it runs 16" rims and as such 11" wide Wranglers. Can't get a 12.5 MTR for 16" rim YET (But soon I hear)

Anyway, in the mud I got through all of the muddy bits, and the guys with the 12.5" Wranglers got snatched. The other car in our group that got throguh all the mud without snatching was the 80 running the Yoko's. Both cars with the 12.5 Wranglers needed a snatch.

So maybe there is something in the fat versus skinny debate, and I just thought I drove better on the day LOL

Cheers

Pete
Posts: 1253
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 1:34 am
Location: QLD

Post by Jeeps »

As long as it's skinnier and has deep lugs and sidewalls with good self cleaning abilities like the simex's, it's generally better. The really gooey, slip-sliding clay sh*t that leaves big massive chunks all over your roof that you can't sink-in to get traction needs a wider tyre, or so i'm told...


Highway terrains suck because they can't "sink" and "bite in" to the harder stuff below.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests