Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Ashcroft versus MD Crawler

Tech Talk for Rover owners.

Moderator: Micka

Post Reply
User avatar
Jay
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:41 pm
Location: Lebanon

Ashcroft versus MD Crawler

Post by Jay »

Do the ashcroft and MD crawler offer the same low range?
I know MD lowers the 1st low by 30% the Ascroft state on their webiste that they do lower it by 80%....I doubt they are comparing apples to apples here
Has anyone purchased the Aschroft transmission

Jay
96 Disco Gamel Trophy 36"*12.5 ET'II's, F&R ARB's,4.75 R&P GBR,GBR F&R
83 Rangie 2" OME Still Stock
Posts: 1606
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:20 pm
Location: Geelong

Post by HSV Rangie »

2 different set ups.

maxi have 30 and 40 % lower.

Ashcroft have the 80% and a bolt reduction unit 1500.00 pounds.

Michael.
Mitsubishi 2010 NT DID Pajero wagon, Factory rear diff lock, Dual batteries, ARB bar, winch, Mt ATZ 4 rib tyres.
1986 RR.
Custom suspension links etc.
HSV 215 engine.
4.3 diffs.
User avatar
Jay
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:41 pm
Location: Lebanon

Post by Jay »

HSV Rangie wrote:2 different set ups.

maxi have 30 and 40 % lower.

Ashcroft have the 80% and a bolt reduction unit 1500.00 pounds.

Michael.
I tought ashcroft is running for 650 pounds(1163 $ US) as listed in the site

How much is the MD crawler running for?
96 Disco Gamel Trophy 36"*12.5 ET'II's, F&R ARB's,4.75 R&P GBR,GBR F&R
83 Rangie 2" OME Still Stock
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

Jay wrote:
HSV Rangie wrote:2 different set ups.

maxi have 30 and 40 % lower.

Ashcroft have the 80% and a bolt reduction unit 1500.00 pounds.

Michael.
I tought ashcroft is running for 650 pounds(1163 $ US) as listed in the site

How much is the MD crawler running for?
You need to use the correct terminology to avoid confusion -

Crawler GEARS or lower low range GEARS

or

Crawler BOX

They are 2 completely different things - the gears replace your existing one, the BOX is a bolt in selectable box - most peopleuse the word "crawler" when talking about the crawler box, not the gears.

MD 30% is about AUD$1700 don't know about the 40% - probably the same or a bit more. The advantage of the MD setup is you can use whatever high renge ratio you want.

As you said the ashcroft GEARS are 650GBP, the BOX is 1500GBP. AFAIK you can only run 1.2:1 high range with the Ashcroft setup.

The advantage of a crawler box is you keep your existing low range as well.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
User avatar
Jay
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:41 pm
Location: Lebanon

Post by Jay »

ISUZUROVER wrote:
Jay wrote:
HSV Rangie wrote:2 different set ups.

maxi have 30 and 40 % lower.

Ashcroft have the 80% and a bolt reduction unit 1500.00 pounds.

Michael.
I tought ashcroft is running for 650 pounds(1163 $ US) as listed in the site

How much is the MD crawler running for?
You need to use the correct terminology to avoid confusion -

Crawler GEARS or lower low range GEARS

or

Crawler BOX

They are 2 completely different things - the gears replace your existing one, the BOX is a bolt in selectable box - most peopleuse the word "crawler" when talking about the crawler box, not the gears.

MD 30% is about AUD$1700 don't know about the 40% - probably the same or a bit more. The advantage of the MD setup is you can use whatever high renge ratio you want.

As you said the ashcroft GEARS are 650GBP, the BOX is 1500GBP. AFAIK you can only run 1.2:1 high range with the Ashcroft setup.

The advantage of a crawler box is you keep your existing low range as well.
Ben

Ok I am talking about crawler gears
so MD has a crawler gears which lowers your low by 30%

Ashcroft lower it by 80%

I am now running 4.75 gears and 36" tyres and need a lower low range on xtreme rockcrawling.

I am trying to calculate the low range with MD versus Ascroft. i have an LT 230 with 4.75.
I am afraid with Ashcroft gears I will no longer have momentum

Crawler Box is too expensive but might be the best option for future savings
Has anyone fitted a dual transfer case on a Rover

jay
96 Disco Gamel Trophy 36"*12.5 ET'II's, F&R ARB's,4.75 R&P GBR,GBR F&R
83 Rangie 2" OME Still Stock
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 4:07 am
Location: Scotland

Post by 1tonsoup »

As you may know Ashcroft has designed their low range gearset so that there is no overlap between high and low range i.e. low 5th is slightly lower geared than 1st gear in high. Good in a tractor maybe but I don't like the sounds of it in an off road/trail vehicle.

What I would like to know is if the Ashcroft underdrive (crawler box) can be used in conjunction with MD lower low range gearsets. That would be the ideal setup.

Seamus.
ex-mil 109 FFR, rotten 110 Tdi, XJ 4.0
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2003 2:35 pm

Post by Maxtd5def »

1tonsoup wrote:As you may know Ashcroft has designed their low range gearset so that there is no overlap between high and low range i.e. low 5th is slightly lower geared than 1st gear in high. Good in a tractor maybe but I don't like the sounds of it in an off road/trail vehicle.

What I would like to know is if the Ashcroft underdrive (crawler box) can be used in conjunction with MD lower low range gearsets. That would be the ideal setup.

Seamus.
If the 80% Ashcroft is too low, why would you go lower? An underdrive plus MD30% is about 350% lower than standard!

If Standard is say 40:1
then MD 30% is 52:1
Ashcroft 80% is 72:1
Ashcroft ud is 108:1
UD+MD30% is 140:1

Regards
Max P
Stereo by Simex!
User avatar
Jay
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:41 pm
Location: Lebanon

Post by Jay »

Maxtd5def wrote:
1tonsoup wrote:As you may know Ashcroft has designed their low range gearset so that there is no overlap between high and low range i.e. low 5th is slightly lower geared than 1st gear in high. Good in a tractor maybe but I don't like the sounds of it in an off road/trail vehicle.

What I would like to know is if the Ashcroft underdrive (crawler box) can be used in conjunction with MD lower low range gearsets. That would be the ideal setup.

Seamus.
If the 80% Ashcroft is too low, why would you go lower? An underdrive plus MD30% is about 350% lower than standard!

If Standard is say 40:1
then MD 30% is 52:1
Ashcroft 80% is 72:1
Ashcroft ud is 108:1
UD+MD30% is 140:1

Regards
Max P
Aschcroft low gears or even underdrive would be too low for anyone running larger tyres and larger gears(4.11+) I think.
You will at ratios 120:1 where the most you need is the most competitive rockcrawling situations is 90:1 or a 100:1
Ashcroft should have made a 40% and 60% to compete effectively with MD I think
96 Disco Gamel Trophy 36"*12.5 ET'II's, F&R ARB's,4.75 R&P GBR,GBR F&R
83 Rangie 2" OME Still Stock
Posts: 1285
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 8:22 pm
Location: gold coast

Post by uninformed »

The Maxi-drive low range gear sets are 30% and 49%, not 40%. This 9%does make a difference to the final ratio.

Serg
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 4:07 am
Location: Scotland

Post by 1tonsoup »

If the 80% Ashcroft is too low, why would you go lower?
Who said anything about the Ashcroft being too low? :?

I was pointing out the fact that no overlap exists between high and low range. Thus there is a good chance that on a moderate trail you will find low range is too low and high range is too high. It would be extremely frustrating to find yourself in 5th low, needing another gear, where changing into 1.2:1 high range 1st gear is not low enough when for example, negotiating a steep descent. The end result is constantly having to switch between high and low range.

Seamus.
ex-mil 109 FFR, rotten 110 Tdi, XJ 4.0
Posts: 1606
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:20 pm
Location: Geelong

Post by HSV Rangie »

go the best option.

Stdd LT230 gears

PLUSS crawler box :lol: :lol: have the best options all around

its only $$$$$

MIchael.
Mitsubishi 2010 NT DID Pajero wagon, Factory rear diff lock, Dual batteries, ARB bar, winch, Mt ATZ 4 rib tyres.
1986 RR.
Custom suspension links etc.
HSV 215 engine.
4.3 diffs.
Posts: 1559
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:35 pm
Location: Captain Creek QLD

Post by Bush65 »

1tonsoup wrote:...What I would like to know is if the Ashcroft underdrive (crawler box) can be used in conjunction with MD lower low range gearsets. That would be the ideal setup.

Seamus.
There is no physical reason why you could not bot an Ashcroft underdrive unit to an LT230 with maxidrive low range gears.

The pto drive (for the underdrive unit) is from teeth on the rear of the input gear. Maxi drive only replace the low range gears, whereas I believe Ashcroft replace all of the gears to obtain 80% more reduction. So the new Ashcroft input gear may not have the pto drive teeth.
John
Posts: 16934
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 6:57 pm

Post by RUFF »

Bush65 wrote:
The pto drive (for the underdrive unit) is from teeth on the rear of the input gear
Is this correct? The Underdrive unit drives off and through the PTO gear on the rear of the Input Gear? Those little Teeth that are about 5mm wide?
User avatar
Jay
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:41 pm
Location: Lebanon

Post by Jay »

HSV Rangie wrote:go the best option.

Stdd LT230 gears

PLUSS crawler box :lol: :lol: have the best options all around

its only $$$$$

MIchael.
Micheal

This is why the Ascroft crawler gear set are an option to consider which is much cheaper.
The underdribe will not bolt on easy on a Rangie or a Disco as there is not place for it.

Looking at the ratios the Aschcroft will give me a 93:1 on my first low which is needed for the xtreme rockcrawling situations.
I can always shift to my high (1 or 2) for easy trailing

With the underdrive you will have some gears overlapping(between you high/low/underdrive low) so you will be paying for gears you migth already have.
96 Disco Gamel Trophy 36"*12.5 ET'II's, F&R ARB's,4.75 R&P GBR,GBR F&R
83 Rangie 2" OME Still Stock
tim
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: UK

Post by tim »

My 90 is at Ashcroft as we speak. Td5 (chipped), converted to an auto box and now having an underdrive fitted.

Should be trying it in a couple of weeks.

Tim
Life's too short for a full time job
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Canada

Post by red90 »

RUFF wrote:Is this correct? The Underdrive unit drives off and through the PTO gear on the rear of the Input Gear? Those little Teeth that are about 5mm wide?
No, it replaces the input gear completely. There are pictures around of the unit apart. Input is a through shaft inside the new input gear. Output is back through the input gear.
[color=red]1991 Landrover 90 ex-MOD[/color]
Posts: 1559
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:35 pm
Location: Captain Creek QLD

Post by Bush65 »

RUFF wrote:
Bush65 wrote:
The pto drive (for the underdrive unit) is from teeth on the rear of the input gear
Is this correct? The Underdrive unit drives off and through the PTO gear on the rear of the Input Gear? Those little Teeth that are about 5mm wide?
Thanks Tony, my mistake. The crawler box incorporates a new input gear and does not drive through the pto teeth.

However I believe I was correct in saying that the Ashcroft 80% lower reduction gears replace the input gear, so that is the most likely reason for them not being compatible with the underdrive.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
John
Posts: 1559
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:35 pm
Location: Captain Creek QLD

Post by Bush65 »

Here are pics of maxidrive (top) and ashcroft gears for the LT230.

Maxidrive uses the stock input gear and high range gears. The intermediate gear is modified for a smaller pinion for low range.

Note that the ashcroft input gear (left of bottom pic) is in a different position to stock. It is further to the rear (and still has the pto drive teeth).

Ashcroft intermediate gear (centre of bottom pic) does not have the centre gear like stock the LT230, which meshes with the input gear.

The different position of the input gear is why it wont work with the underdrive box.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
John
Posts: 157
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 2:12 am
Location: Exmoor England

Post by tony cordell »

Image

Image
Defender 90 Modified
Defender 110XS Standard

[url=http://www.lr4x4.com]lr4x4.com[/url]
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests