Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

94 defender

Tech Talk for Rover owners.

Moderator: Micka

Post Reply
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 11:30 am
Location: Northern Territory

94 defender

Post by griff »

there's a 94 defender tdi wagon for sale in katherine.

290k's, reco'drear axles, serviced, head hasn't stuffed up (yet?..)

needs a seal job on the top of transfer case - bloke has been quoted $700ish

has - roof rack + ladders, cargo barrier, skiny rims (needs tyres), standard range tank, new a/c, water tank - usual touring stuff...

trouble is: i live remote, havn't seen car, bloke is chasing $10 000

what say you??

doesn't 'clunk' or have any rust. have driven a few of these and been impressed but never owned one.

interested inpeolple'srespnes, bloke wasn't sur if it was 200 or 300tdi, also whn did bosch (non-prince-of-darkness) electrics appear? Is an Isuzu 3.9 County a better buy,although much older?
TD42 GQ Wagon
FJ75 Troopy
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:08 am
Location: Mooroolbark, Victoria

Re: 94 defender

Post by sclarke7171 »

griff wrote:there's a 94 defender tdi wagon for sale in katherine.

290k's, reco'drear axles, serviced, head hasn't stuffed up (yet?..)

needs a seal job on the top of transfer case - bloke has been quoted $700ish

has - roof rack + ladders, cargo barrier, skiny rims (needs tyres), standard range tank, new a/c, water tank - usual touring stuff...

trouble is: i live remote, havn't seen car, bloke is chasing $10 000

what say you??

doesn't 'clunk' or have any rust. have driven a few of these and been impressed but never owned one.

interested inpeolple'srespnes, bloke wasn't sur if it was 200 or 300tdi, also whn did bosch (non-prince-of-darkness) electrics appear? Is an Isuzu 3.9 County a better buy,although much older?
Thats on the cheaper side. unless it has had the transfer rebuilt at one stage it will need and output shaft on the gearbox and the input gear on the Transfer. No landy with 300k on the clock will survive the dreded input gear wear unless it has been fixed. Ask him if it has. other wise factor in another $2500-$3500 to do it properly.

$10k is not bad, screw him to 9k..... Ohh see if it is Vent disc up front and see if it is a R380 box, 94 was the change over for alot of things on Fenders.

Mine is a 200tdi 94 model, LT77 box, Vented Disc front, disc rear. odd combination...
1986 County, Auto, Locker, Maxi Crawler gears.
1987 RRC, Auto, Lockers, Himount. POS
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 11:30 am
Location: Northern Territory

Post by griff »

Thanks for the reply,

Is the post 94 (300) a better vehicle:stronger g/box, more reliable electrics etc?

Is the Isuzu County prone to these transfer case and g/box probs??

Cheers Griff
TD42 GQ Wagon
FJ75 Troopy
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:08 am
Location: Mooroolbark, Victoria

Post by sclarke7171 »

OK the 300 is a better engine if it has been looked after. they had a timing belt problem, but a fix was issued in the 90's for it. if it has 300k then it will have this fix.
in 94 they started the swap over the R380 gearbox is better then the LT77.

Electrics are the same from 92-98 or there abouts.

Countys with isuzu engine are good, but not a par on the 200 or 300 in drivability off road..... Countys have stronger CV's and that is it....

id say look at the 94 model and see what it is.... it is mid level in price.... bargin 94's go for 7k top ones about 14k.

My 94 was 11k with 200k on the clock and imaculate...... its not now....
1986 County, Auto, Locker, Maxi Crawler gears.
1987 RRC, Auto, Lockers, Himount. POS
Posts: 1767
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Just Near Fraser Island

Post by Maggot4x4 »

sclarke7171 wrote:
Countys with isuzu engine are good, but not a par on the 200 or 300 in drivability off road
That is the biggest load of CRAP I have ever heard!

The county is by far the better vehicle, the Isuzu 4BD1 is the best motor ever put in a landy IMO. No timming belts to worry about, it's gear driven. The gear box if 5 speed will be an LT85 Santana, probably the strongest 5 speed in a Landy (Some will disagree and say an R380 is stronger) with LT230. If 4 speed will be an LT95, this combo is still used by the Aust. army.

Strongest factory drivetrain and diffs that LR made (bar the 101FC) & coils just like a fender.

300-400km is the expected service life of a TDI, Isuzu 4BD1 is 600km in a 6 tonne isuzu truck, so how long do you thing it will last in a 2.5 tonne landy? Ask the army.
[quote="Wooders"]If ya want a 4x4 camry go ahead & buy a Patrol or Cruiser.[/quote]Rangie with 80s LC diffs, Isuzu 4bd1, Twin ARB lockers, 8000lb Hi mount warn, 315x75x16 Procomp XTerrains
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: Narellan NSW

Post by andrew e »

griff wrote:Thanks for the reply,

Is the Isuzu County prone to these transfer case and g/box probs??

Cheers Griff
my 5 speed in my county broke a main shaft without trying. go the 4 speed if you want an isuzu.

Andrew.
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:08 am
Location: Mooroolbark, Victoria

Post by sclarke7171 »

Maggot4x4 wrote:
sclarke7171 wrote:
Countys with isuzu engine are good, but not a par on the 200 or 300 in drivability off road
That is the biggest load of CRAP I have ever heard!

The county is by far the better vehicle, the Isuzu 4BD1 is the best motor ever put in a landy IMO. No timming belts to worry about, it's gear driven. The gear box if 5 speed will be an LT85 Santana, probably the strongest 5 speed in a Landy (Some will disagree and say an R380 is stronger) with LT230. If 4 speed will be an LT95, this combo is still used by the Aust. army.

Strongest factory drivetrain and diffs that LR made (bar the 101FC) & coils just like a fender.

300-400km is the expected service life of a TDI, Isuzu 4BD1 is 600km in a 6 tonne isuzu truck, so how long do you thing it will last in a 2.5 tonne landy? Ask the army.
OK so i'm wrong. Take your anger out elsewhere. I cant remember 1 time i replyed witht he attitude you just did. You made your point.
Sometimes its easyier to say "Sorry your wrong" then spill the facts.
My reasoning we due to my experiance. Not the army or the fact an isuzu last longer in a truck. If they were so good why did LR scrap them for the 200 and 300?. Just my thoughts with no anger attached.
You cant also gauge the time frame a vehilce will last form the Army's point. They treat stuff like crap and if they get 100k from a vehicle its a miricle. OK they might prove in their situation that the isuzu suits their neds better, but i would say in my eyes that the 200 and 300 are a better engine for the general public. Timing belts only give problems when not looked after. Every 100k on a 200 and every 80k on a 300. Belts are better long term. That has been proven time and time again. Every engine designed in the 40's to 60's was gear drive (some exceptions) then the belts came out. Quieter and more simplistic. All these guys that have belt failure is due to lack of maintenance or incorrect fitment. ive broken a belt on a sedan and it was due to lack of maintenace. ive also broken gears on a car. How did it happen??? oil was there, engine was not stressed and it was a high quality euro car. So there is pro's and cons for every side. You expressed your opinion, i just expessed mine again.
1986 County, Auto, Locker, Maxi Crawler gears.
1987 RRC, Auto, Lockers, Himount. POS
Posts: 1559
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:35 pm
Location: Captain Creek QLD

Post by Bush65 »

IMHO the 4BD1 was the best engine ever fitted by the factory into a rover. I have both a 300Tdi and 4BD1-T and have had 3.5 and 4.6 v8's in the past.

Far more reliable and more torque from idle than either 200Tdi or 300Tdi. They will do 1/2 million km between o/haul if treated properly. And no electrics (except starter and alternator - and if they fail the engine will still run happily).

I would say there are several reasons why rover discontinued the 4BD1 in favour of the 200Tdi, but none to do with the 200Tdi being better in any way (which it isn't).

Early R380 have a bad rep for breaking mainshafts. The later ones are much stronger. I doubt the R380 is as strong as an LT85.
John
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

Bush65 wrote:IMHO the 4BD1 was the best engine ever fitted by the factory into a rover.
I agree. I have a county with a 4BD1 (and LT85), and have owned a V8 county, and driven quite a few (tweaked and stock) 300Tdis (forgetting the multitudes of series trucks for a moment).

In termy of general driveability on road, my NA 4BD1 goes as well or better than the mildly tweaked 300's I have driven.

The only disadvantage of the 4BD1 is it is big, heavy and slightly noisy, but all this is outweighed by the low rpm torque, durability and strength, and ease of servicing of the engine - and ease of turbocharging an NA engine.

Perfectly happy with the LT85 too - Andrew e - maybe your mainshaft had defects or was fatigued by a shuddering clutch etc... That sort of failure is pretty rare IME.
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: Narellan NSW

Post by andrew e »

yes, it may have been fatigued (about 340000kms if my memory is correct) and i dont want to sound like i'm rubbishing the lt85, but when somthing breaks, i like to go stronger rather than just replace, and since almost everyone says the lt95 4 speed is the strongest box rover produced, thats whats in mine now. The 5 speed was a nicer box to drive with (the 4 speed has truck like tendencies) and gee how i do miss that 5th gear EVERY dam day doing 110 on the freeway.

If you are planning to keep the car standard with 750 16s i would keep the lt85.

and as for why landrover stopped putting 4bd1s in their aus models, the reason i heard was that the poms couldnt sleep at night with a jap motor under their bonnet and always considered it temporary.

Andrew.
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:08 am
Location: Mooroolbark, Victoria

Post by sclarke7171 »

What ever the reason, it seems the Isuzu has some benefits.
Weight would not be one i would think.

also the 200 and 300 have no electrics apart from the alt and starter.
1986 County, Auto, Locker, Maxi Crawler gears.
1987 RRC, Auto, Lockers, Himount. POS
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

sclarke7171 wrote:Countys have stronger CV's and that is it....
.
This also needs to be corrected...

Advantages of a county over a defender (besides the CV's and the engine/gearbox):

Stronger rear trailing arms (much larger diameter)
Wider spaced bearings in hubs (early 200's had this too)
Better rear axle shaft lubrication and better quality rear axles stock
Better air-con system (cools more than just your knees and is in the dash - not taking up legroom)
Stronger roof (2 extra ribs)
Load leveller in the rear so you can run softer springs for more travel
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 1767
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Just Near Fraser Island

Post by Maggot4x4 »

sclarke7171 wrote:OK so i'm wrong. Take your anger out elsewhere.
Not angry, but that was just crap, no other way to put it.
[quote="Wooders"]If ya want a 4x4 camry go ahead & buy a Patrol or Cruiser.[/quote]Rangie with 80s LC diffs, Isuzu 4bd1, Twin ARB lockers, 8000lb Hi mount warn, 315x75x16 Procomp XTerrains
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 11:30 am
Location: Northern Territory

fenda

Post by griff »

Geeez.. How's about that?..

Looks like the bloody thing has gone, anyway, wasn't able to drive out to Katherine as planned.

Back to the drawing board...

Thanks for all your replies and opinions gentlemen.
Griff
TD42 GQ Wagon
FJ75 Troopy
Posts: 1559
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:35 pm
Location: Captain Creek QLD

Post by Bush65 »

sclarke7171 wrote:What ever the reason, it seems the Isuzu has some benefits.
Weight would not be one i would think.

also the 200 and 300 have no electrics apart from the alt and starter.
Yes the Isuzu is heavy - about what you would expect from a heavy duty diesel. Dimensions and weight are very similar to Cummins 4BT.

300Tdi and I would think also 200Tdi have solenoid fuel cutoff on injector pump. So engine can't run without power to the solenoid.

My 4BD1-T has mechanical fuel cutoff. If all electrics including battery fail (and I have known of someone getting stuck in a remote area when battery failed). If the Isuzu can be bump started or started with jumper from another battery it will continue to run.

IMHO inline pumps as used on 4BD1 are better than VE pumps on 200/300Tdi.

300Tdi (and I think 200Tdi) have 2 stage injectors that aren't used on any other engine. The 2 stage design makes the engine run smoother, but no diesel service people are able to service or test them properly - only the 1st stage.

I don't agree with your earlier remark about belts being better than gears. BTW Rover issued a service bulletin to reduce the tension of the belt because it has led to premature failure of the injector pump, but it is not common knowledge as far as I can tell and people still use the old tension stated in the workshop manual.

BTW I think the 300Tdi is a better engine than a lot of Toyota and Nissan diesels.

But Isuzu would not the largest manufacturer of diesels in the world if they could not design and build a better diesel than Rover (they have produced some poor engines, but the 4BD1 is not one of them).
John
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests