Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
How good is your fuel economy?
Moderator: Micka
How good is your fuel economy?
Just thought we could all make some comparisons to see where some people are doing better than others, and how they've done it. I'm thinking of making some polution gear disappear, help it run better ect. Also taking about diff ratios, tyre diameters, aspiration, the list gos on.
Lets us know your;
-Engine size
-Year/Model
-Aspiration (if not factory)
-Ks you expect -on the highway -in the city -in the bush
-What you've done to make it better/worse
My Rangies a 3.5lt '89, bog stock ,
70lts gets me 420ks... or 6ks per litre
Not 100% on city/bush yet, but obviously less
Lets us know your;
-Engine size
-Year/Model
-Aspiration (if not factory)
-Ks you expect -on the highway -in the city -in the bush
-What you've done to make it better/worse
My Rangies a 3.5lt '89, bog stock ,
70lts gets me 420ks... or 6ks per litre
Not 100% on city/bush yet, but obviously less
S111 - 109"
186ci 3.0lt
1600kg soft top loaded
high speed transfer case - 2900 @ 100Kph
31" cheese cutters
70 litre = 500k min (hwy)
removed engine fan for noise but also good for econ
also i dont know if this is right but hot air = better economy
ie: snorkles not the best for hwy
big tyres suck
power steer + air con suck
full time 4wd sucks
old school efi sucks
carbies suck
extra weight sucks
186ci 3.0lt
1600kg soft top loaded
high speed transfer case - 2900 @ 100Kph
31" cheese cutters
70 litre = 500k min (hwy)
removed engine fan for noise but also good for econ
also i dont know if this is right but hot air = better economy
ie: snorkles not the best for hwy
big tyres suck
power steer + air con suck
full time 4wd sucks
old school efi sucks
carbies suck
extra weight sucks
Ex-Army - SeriesIII -186s - NP435 - Maxi rear - megasquirt coilpack ignition - AM FM radio with 2 X speakers
300 tdi in defender ute 35's, 2.5 straight off the turbo. approx 11l/100km
v8 4.4 fuel injected petrol, extractor ,no mech fan, rover heads, mild cam, lt95 box, on 31's around 18l/100km
38's approx 20-25l/100km (all off road and freway trip s)
honda city - 1l 4cyl. extra wieght carrying passengers, always redlined snapped through the gears, 20 l tank- 280 km WTF..????
v8 4.4 fuel injected petrol, extractor ,no mech fan, rover heads, mild cam, lt95 box, on 31's around 18l/100km
38's approx 20-25l/100km (all off road and freway trip s)
honda city - 1l 4cyl. extra wieght carrying passengers, always redlined snapped through the gears, 20 l tank- 280 km WTF..????
110 County - 4BD1 NA ISUZU Diesel (3.9L):
road pattern 235/85/16's
Best 8.2L/100km
Worst 13.6L/100km
Average 9.5L/100km
Figures didn't change much when I switched to 33" MTRs (average maybe 9.7 instead of 9.5).
109" IIA ute - 2.25D
33" MTRs
Average 9L/100km
Same truck when it had a 2.25P averaged 15-17L/100km
road pattern 235/85/16's
Best 8.2L/100km
Worst 13.6L/100km
Average 9.5L/100km
Figures didn't change much when I switched to 33" MTRs (average maybe 9.7 instead of 9.5).
109" IIA ute - 2.25D
33" MTRs
Average 9L/100km
Same truck when it had a 2.25P averaged 15-17L/100km
Are you sure? - I doubt that for a military 109 - more like 1800+popeye wrote: 1600kg soft top loaded
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
yeah, its about right. I have weighed it twice, same both times.Are you sure? - I doubt that for a military 109 - more like 1800+
no way 1800kg that is fat ???
if anything the mil spec would be lighter as they are stripped of anything not essential.
Ex-Army - SeriesIII -186s - NP435 - Maxi rear - megasquirt coilpack ignition - AM FM radio with 2 X speakers
Thsi is wat i observed with my rangie
89' 3.5 EFI, ZF Auto, 3.54 diff gears.
Stock - 29" Tyres - 450ks City, 500ks Hwy
6" Springs 33" Rubber - 400ks City, 470ks Hwy
5" Springs 35" Rubber - 350ks City, 420ks Hwy
4" Springs 37" Rubber - 350ks City, 380ks Hwy
wierd how the milage drop in the city but didnt change when i went to 37s, actually think it got better ks around town but noticably worse on the highway.
never really calculated offroad but i do know that i once got about 220ks on the beach with the 35s
I also once chewed half a tank in half a day out ormeau (max distance traveled 40ks).
89' 3.5 EFI, ZF Auto, 3.54 diff gears.
Stock - 29" Tyres - 450ks City, 500ks Hwy
6" Springs 33" Rubber - 400ks City, 470ks Hwy
5" Springs 35" Rubber - 350ks City, 420ks Hwy
4" Springs 37" Rubber - 350ks City, 380ks Hwy
wierd how the milage drop in the city but didnt change when i went to 37s, actually think it got better ks around town but noticably worse on the highway.
never really calculated offroad but i do know that i once got about 220ks on the beach with the 35s
I also once chewed half a tank in half a day out ormeau (max distance traveled 40ks).
RR 1986
engine Holden 355 ci (5.7lt) 250KW
ZF auto
LT230 with 1.003-1 h/range gears
diffs 4.3-1
tyres 35 s/stones.
50mm body lift
75mm spring lift.
H/way 11.6 - 13.3 lt per 100k
city 15 - 18 lt per 100k
Off road worse. but fun
Michael
engine Holden 355 ci (5.7lt) 250KW
ZF auto
LT230 with 1.003-1 h/range gears
diffs 4.3-1
tyres 35 s/stones.
50mm body lift
75mm spring lift.
H/way 11.6 - 13.3 lt per 100k
city 15 - 18 lt per 100k
Off road worse. but fun
Michael
Mitsubishi 2010 NT DID Pajero wagon, Factory rear diff lock, Dual batteries, ARB bar, winch, Mt ATZ 4 rib tyres.
1986 RR.
Custom suspension links etc.
HSV 215 engine.
4.3 diffs.
1986 RR.
Custom suspension links etc.
HSV 215 engine.
4.3 diffs.
RR 1993
engine 3.9L with bling cam and wolf 3D engine computer
ZF auto
LT230
diffs 4.11
tyres 33 slicks and 35 off roadies
50mm body lift
75mm spring lift.
i get about 100 to 300 k from 80l tank off road on 35's
and on 33's on hwyway anout 380 to 450 from 80l around town 350 a tank
engine 3.9L with bling cam and wolf 3D engine computer
ZF auto
LT230
diffs 4.11
tyres 33 slicks and 35 off roadies
50mm body lift
75mm spring lift.
i get about 100 to 300 k from 80l tank off road on 35's
and on 33's on hwyway anout 380 to 450 from 80l around town 350 a tank
TD5 96 Discovery UTE.
Stock 89 3.5 efi with long range tank got 700km from 97ltrs on last trip from Adelaide to Melbourne, loaded with gear = 13.85ltrs per 100 sitting on ave 115km/h
best ive done on highway = 13.3ltrs per 100
around town more like 15 - 20 ltrs
Decent figures reason for not touching anything yet as motor is still very strong after 257,000km
best ive done on highway = 13.3ltrs per 100
around town more like 15 - 20 ltrs
Decent figures reason for not touching anything yet as motor is still very strong after 257,000km
Whats the brake???????????????
Thats not bad! Cant complain to much there.s3111107@ wrote:Stock 89 3.5 efi with long range tank got 700km from 97ltrs on last trip from Adelaide to Melbourne, loaded with gear = 13.85ltrs per 100 sitting on ave 115km/h
best ive done on highway = 13.3ltrs per 100
around town more like 15 - 20 ltrs
Decent figures reason for not touching anything yet as motor is still very strong after 257,000km
Military landies are heavier than the same body type in civi - stock for stock. Military landies have a one-ton chassis with extra reinforcing, heavy bullbar, extra axle-tube reinforcing, extra electrics (blackout lights, etc...). A mates stock x-mil IIA (converted to a ute with canvas canopy), tips the scales at 1970kg (with 2 31" spares).popeye wrote:yeah, its about right. I have weighed it twice, same both times.Are you sure? - I doubt that for a military 109 - more like 1800+
no way 1800kg that is fat ???
if anything the mil spec would be lighter as they are stripped of anything not essential.
Hijack off...
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Fuel economy, well, I'll do my best.
1983 Rangie 4 door, 3.5 L V8 with std stombergs and no extractors. 32 inch MT/R's (235/85R16's)
With previous LT95 4 speed- 22-25l/100kms (about 320-340 a tank, sometimes a LOT less )
ZF auto about 25-27l/100 kms, about 300kms to a tank on avg. Never botherd to take notice. Once the fuel light somes on, time to refill .
With the 4.4 Leyland job, will be interesting how good it is, not excpecting much and will be enjoying the extra bit of power to bother with.
Trav
1983 Rangie 4 door, 3.5 L V8 with std stombergs and no extractors. 32 inch MT/R's (235/85R16's)
With previous LT95 4 speed- 22-25l/100kms (about 320-340 a tank, sometimes a LOT less )
ZF auto about 25-27l/100 kms, about 300kms to a tank on avg. Never botherd to take notice. Once the fuel light somes on, time to refill .
With the 4.4 Leyland job, will be interesting how good it is, not excpecting much and will be enjoying the extra bit of power to bother with.
Trav
Land Rover- The Collingwood of 4WD's!!!!
Hot air = better economy? How the hell do you figure? hot air will make it run richer, meaning you'll be under acceleration for longer. The colder air is, the denser it becomes, and the more power you get (assuming it doesn't go too lean, which is unlikely) If you assume fuel to be a constant, you get more power with colder air, and you accelerate for a shorter time, due to the extra power.removed engine fan for noise but also good for econ
also i dont know if this is right but hot air = better economy
ie: snorkles not the best for hwy
big tyres suck
power steer + air con suck
full time 4wd sucks
old school efi sucks
carbies suck
extra weight sucks
As far as removal of engine fan - if you get stuck in traffic, be careful. If you do only highway driving, there is no reall problem with removing the fan, but if you have stop start driving, be careful. Perhaps fit thermo fans off something?
84 Rangie, 3 inch spring lift, 2 inch body, Megasquirted 4.6, R380, rear Maxi, 34x11.5 JT2s. Simex FM installed.
yep... with a stock 29" tyre and with 37's now, that is around 30% difference..BIg StEvE wrote:Yer i reckon i was waiting for someone to bring this up.landy_man wrote:are you guys measuring your km's with a gps or off the speedo... because if it is with speedo, dont forget that different tyre sizes will change your speedo reading in km/h and distance travelled...
So.. Anthony, your figures appear quite good if you were using your odometer and not adding the correction in.
on 35's and 4.11 diffs my speedo is 100% and with 33 it's 5% underlandy_man wrote:are you guys measuring your km's with a gps or off the speedo... because if it is with speedo, dont forget that different tyre sizes will change your speedo reading in km/h and distance travelled...
TD5 96 Discovery UTE.
s3111107@ wrote:Stock 89 3.5 efi with long range tank got 700km from 97ltrs on last trip from Adelaide to Melbourne, loaded with gear = 13.85ltrs per 100 sitting on ave 115km/h
best ive done on highway = 13.3ltrs per 100
around town more like 15 - 20 ltrs
Decent figures reason for not touching anything yet as motor is still very strong after 257,000km
13.85 @ 115km/h
My car would almost be at 1lt - 1km by that stage
115km/h Constantly
Mick
Land Rover Discovery - GQ conversion underway
yeah, but you only have 2 pedal positions... on or offmickrangie wrote:on 35's and 4.11 diffs my speedo is 100% and with 33 it's 5% underlandy_man wrote:are you guys measuring your km's with a gps or off the speedo... because if it is with speedo, dont forget that different tyre sizes will change your speedo reading in km/h and distance travelled...
and dont really care about economy... well, offroad anyway
raginrover wrote:
hijack back on:
Ben wrote:
mine has the same axles as the civi versions + only difference in the chassis is the removable x-member + galvonising afaik. all extra wiring has been removed, as has the bull bar. Bare bones 1300kg is acheivable.
130+ rwhp = yee haaa (yeah i know)
I could be wrong but this is how i figure it : hot air is less dense than cold air. efi systems will definatly pick up on this and pump less fuel. dont know how carbies deal with the situation. less power = better economy. the air fuel ratio will (should) remain the same but volumetric efficiency will drop hence the drop in power and the increase in economy. Dont know about acceleration but you dont do much on the hwy, mostly constant throttle. FWIW i'd rather have the extra power. i have fitted a vp commo fan - no dramas with overheating (except when i forget to turn it on )Hot air = better economy? How the hell do you figure? hot air will make it run richer, meaning you'll be under acceleration for longer. The colder air is, the denser it becomes, and the more power you get (assuming it doesn't go too lean, which is unlikely) If you assume fuel to be a constant, you get more power with colder air, and you accelerate for a shorter time, due to the extra power.
As far as removal of engine fan - if you get stuck in traffic, be careful. If you do only highway driving, there is no reall problem with removing the fan, but if you have stop start driving, be careful. Perhaps fit thermo fans off something?
hijack back on:
Ben wrote:
series 2 landies had a completely different chassis to the series3, which could account for the weight differance, also holden mtr.Military landies are heavier than the same body type in civi - stock for stock. Military landies have a one-ton chassis with extra reinforcing, heavy bullbar, extra axle-tube reinforcing, extra electrics (blackout lights, etc...). A mates stock x-mil IIA (converted to a ute with canvas canopy), tips the scales at 1970kg (with 2 31" spares).
mine has the same axles as the civi versions + only difference in the chassis is the removable x-member + galvonising afaik. all extra wiring has been removed, as has the bull bar. Bare bones 1300kg is acheivable.
130+ rwhp = yee haaa (yeah i know)
Ex-Army - SeriesIII -186s - NP435 - Maxi rear - megasquirt coilpack ignition - AM FM radio with 2 X speakers
OK, I'll throw a spanner in the works.
79 RR, 4.4, dual fuel, 31s.
My fuel EFFICIENCY is:
20L/100km on petrol,
20L/100km on gas.
These are a combination of hwy/city.
I don't measure bush figures.
I drive 99% on gas, so my fuel ECONOMY is $10/100km (50c/L)
79 RR, 4.4, dual fuel, 31s.
My fuel EFFICIENCY is:
20L/100km on petrol,
20L/100km on gas.
These are a combination of hwy/city.
I don't measure bush figures.
I drive 99% on gas, so my fuel ECONOMY is $10/100km (50c/L)
Harry
79 Rangie (his name is Ralf) 4.4 dual fuel, with plenty of other mods.
Oils leaks are a factory option to prevent rust!
79 Rangie (his name is Ralf) 4.4 dual fuel, with plenty of other mods.
Oils leaks are a factory option to prevent rust!
110 3.9 Isuzu LT85 1.003 3.54 235/85R16
From memory;
Best = 8L / 100 KM
Worst = 13.5L / 100 KM
Average = 9.5l / 100 KM
90 2.8 Isuzu (4JB1-T) ZF auto 1.222 3.54 255/85R16
Between 8 - 9.5L / 100 KM (once again from memory will check when I am home)
From memory;
Best = 8L / 100 KM
Worst = 13.5L / 100 KM
Average = 9.5l / 100 KM
90 2.8 Isuzu (4JB1-T) ZF auto 1.222 3.54 255/85R16
Between 8 - 9.5L / 100 KM (once again from memory will check when I am home)
I drive the 90 everywhere so fuel economy is AU$21/100km (£0.969/L, ~2.35 exchange rate)I drive 99% on gas, so my fuel ECONOMY is $10/100km (50c/L)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests