Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

How good is your fuel economy?

Tech Talk for Rover owners.

Moderator: Micka

Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 12:01 pm
Location: Mt. Buller, Victoria

How good is your fuel economy?

Post by Marty1 »

Just thought we could all make some comparisons to see where some people are doing better than others, and how they've done it. I'm thinking of making some polution gear disappear, help it run better ect. Also taking about diff ratios, tyre diameters, aspiration, the list gos on.

Lets us know your;
-Engine size
-Year/Model
-Aspiration (if not factory)
-Ks you expect -on the highway -in the city -in the bush
-What you've done to make it better/worse

My Rangies a 3.5lt '89, bog stock :cry: ,
70lts gets me 420ks... or 6ks per litre
Not 100% on city/bush yet, but obviously less
Posts: 827
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:52 pm

Post by F'n_Rover »

S111 - 109"
186ci 3.0lt
1600kg soft top loaded
high speed transfer case - 2900 @ 100Kph
31" cheese cutters
70 litre = 500k min (hwy)

removed engine fan for noise but also good for econ

also i dont know if this is right but hot air = better economy
ie: snorkles not the best for hwy
big tyres suck
power steer + air con suck
full time 4wd sucks
old school efi sucks
carbies suck
extra weight sucks
Ex-Army - SeriesIII -186s - NP435 - Maxi rear - megasquirt coilpack ignition - AM FM radio with 2 X speakers
Posts: 532
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 11:39 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Davidh »

91 3.5 V8 Disco, 35's 4.11's, average 200-250k's 60-70l's, off road, usually 150-200k's.
What do i do about it? Nothing. It's a weekend car anyway! :D
Posts: 268
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by Rangie ute on 38'' »

300 tdi in defender ute 35's, 2.5 straight off the turbo. approx 11l/100km
v8 4.4 fuel injected petrol, extractor ,no mech fan, rover heads, mild cam, lt95 box, on 31's around 18l/100km
38's approx 20-25l/100km (all off road and freway trip s)

honda city - 1l 4cyl. extra wieght carrying passengers, always redlined snapped through the gears, 20 l tank- 280 km WTF..???? :D
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

110 County - 4BD1 NA ISUZU Diesel (3.9L):
road pattern 235/85/16's
Best 8.2L/100km
Worst 13.6L/100km
Average 9.5L/100km

Figures didn't change much when I switched to 33" MTRs (average maybe 9.7 instead of 9.5).

109" IIA ute - 2.25D
33" MTRs
Average 9L/100km

Same truck when it had a 2.25P averaged 15-17L/100km
popeye wrote: 1600kg soft top loaded
Are you sure? - I doubt that for a military 109 - more like 1800+
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 827
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:52 pm

Post by F'n_Rover »

Are you sure? - I doubt that for a military 109 - more like 1800+
yeah, its about right. I have weighed it twice, same both times.
no way 1800kg that is fat ???

if anything the mil spec would be lighter as they are stripped of anything not essential.
Ex-Army - SeriesIII -186s - NP435 - Maxi rear - megasquirt coilpack ignition - AM FM radio with 2 X speakers
Posts: 1005
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 8:34 am
Location: Croydon, Victoria

Post by TRobbo »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
94 3.9 V8 Disco,
34's 4.11's,
Snorkel
Highway 5.5 kpl.
City ~ 5 kpl
Bush - who knows the wheels always travel further than the actual distance covered anyway :lol:
Warn - Dont leave home without it
Posts: 10984
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 3:47 pm
Location: Bum drilling with my buddy Ray!

Post by GRIMACE »

Thsi is wat i observed with my rangie
89' 3.5 EFI, ZF Auto, 3.54 diff gears.
Stock - 29" Tyres - 450ks City, 500ks Hwy
6" Springs 33" Rubber - 400ks City, 470ks Hwy
5" Springs 35" Rubber - 350ks City, 420ks Hwy
4" Springs 37" Rubber - 350ks City, 380ks Hwy

wierd how the milage drop in the city but didnt change when i went to 37s, actually think it got better ks around town :? but noticably worse on the highway.

never really calculated offroad but i do know that i once got about 220ks on the beach with the 35s
I also once chewed half a tank in half a day out ormeau (max distance traveled 40ks).
Posts: 1606
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:20 pm
Location: Geelong

Post by HSV Rangie »

RR 1986
engine Holden 355 ci (5.7lt) 250KW
ZF auto
LT230 with 1.003-1 h/range gears
diffs 4.3-1
tyres 35 s/stones.

50mm body lift
75mm spring lift.

H/way 11.6 - 13.3 lt per 100k
city 15 - 18 lt per 100k
Off road worse. but fun

Michael
Mitsubishi 2010 NT DID Pajero wagon, Factory rear diff lock, Dual batteries, ARB bar, winch, Mt ATZ 4 rib tyres.
1986 RR.
Custom suspension links etc.
HSV 215 engine.
4.3 diffs.
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 12:28 pm
Location: Eastern Sector

Post by mickrangie »

RR 1993
engine 3.9L with bling cam and wolf 3D engine computer
ZF auto
LT230
diffs 4.11
tyres 33 slicks and 35 off roadies

50mm body lift
75mm spring lift.

i get about 100 to 300 k from 80l tank off road on 35's
and on 33's on hwyway anout 380 to 450 from 80l around town 350 a tank
TD5 96 Discovery UTE.
Posts: 1006
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 8:25 pm
Location: Strapped into the Evil!

Post by BIg StEvE »

Bwahahaha fuel economy! :lol:
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 12:28 pm
Location: Eastern Sector

Post by mickrangie »

BIg StEvE wrote:Bwahahaha fuel economy! :lol:

BWHAAAA not on its side :rofl: :rofl:
TD5 96 Discovery UTE.
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:23 pm
Location: Adelaide

Post by s3111107@ »

Stock 89 3.5 efi with long range tank got 700km from 97ltrs on last trip from Adelaide to Melbourne, loaded with gear = 13.85ltrs per 100 sitting on ave 115km/h

best ive done on highway = 13.3ltrs per 100

around town more like 15 - 20 ltrs

Decent figures reason for not touching anything yet as motor is still very strong after 257,000km
Whats the brake???????????????
Posts: 1006
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 8:25 pm
Location: Strapped into the Evil!

Post by BIg StEvE »

s3111107@ wrote:Stock 89 3.5 efi with long range tank got 700km from 97ltrs on last trip from Adelaide to Melbourne, loaded with gear = 13.85ltrs per 100 sitting on ave 115km/h

best ive done on highway = 13.3ltrs per 100

around town more like 15 - 20 ltrs

Decent figures reason for not touching anything yet as motor is still very strong after 257,000km
Thats not bad! Cant complain to much there.
Posts: 1006
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 8:25 pm
Location: Strapped into the Evil!

Post by BIg StEvE »

mickrangie wrote:
BIg StEvE wrote:Bwahahaha fuel economy! :lol:

BWHAAAA not on its side :rofl: :rofl:
Bwahahahahaha that has to be the joke of the week! :roll: Congratulations! Meh as if i give a fark about fuel economy.
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 12:01 pm
Location: Mt. Buller, Victoria

Post by Marty1 »

I'm not overly concerned about economy either, but if I can spend less and/or go better I want to know where and how to do it. When it does come time for a new/fresh/different engine this will be some handy info too..... 4.6s????
Posts: 5803
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 3:02 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by ISUZUROVER »

popeye wrote:
Are you sure? - I doubt that for a military 109 - more like 1800+
yeah, its about right. I have weighed it twice, same both times.
no way 1800kg that is fat ???

if anything the mil spec would be lighter as they are stripped of anything not essential.
Military landies are heavier than the same body type in civi - stock for stock. Military landies have a one-ton chassis with extra reinforcing, heavy bullbar, extra axle-tube reinforcing, extra electrics (blackout lights, etc...). A mates stock x-mil IIA (converted to a ute with canvas canopy), tips the scales at 1970kg (with 2 31" spares).

Hijack off...
_____________________________________________________________
RUFF wrote:Beally STFU Your becoming a real PITA.
Posts: 640
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2002 4:04 pm
Location: Snake Valley VIC

Post by Aquarangie »

Fuel economy, well, I'll do my best.

1983 Rangie 4 door, 3.5 L V8 with std stombergs and no extractors. 32 inch MT/R's (235/85R16's)

With previous LT95 4 speed- 22-25l/100kms (about 320-340 a tank, sometimes a LOT less :twisted: )

ZF auto about 25-27l/100 kms, about 300kms to a tank on avg. Never botherd to take notice. Once the fuel light somes on, time to refill :armsup: .

With the 4.4 Leyland job, will be interesting how good it is, not excpecting much and will be enjoying the extra bit of power to bother with.

Trav
Land Rover- The Collingwood of 4WD's!!!!
Posts: 1614
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:44 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by landy_man »

are you guys measuring your km's with a gps or off the speedo... because if it is with speedo, dont forget that different tyre sizes will change your speedo reading in km/h and distance travelled...
Posts: 1006
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 8:25 pm
Location: Strapped into the Evil!

Post by BIg StEvE »

landy_man wrote:are you guys measuring your km's with a gps or off the speedo... because if it is with speedo, dont forget that different tyre sizes will change your speedo reading in km/h and distance travelled...
Yer i reckon i was waiting for someone to bring this up.
Posts: 369
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by RangingRover »

removed engine fan for noise but also good for econ

also i dont know if this is right but hot air = better economy
ie: snorkles not the best for hwy
big tyres suck
power steer + air con suck
full time 4wd sucks
old school efi sucks
carbies suck
extra weight sucks
Hot air = better economy? How the hell do you figure? hot air will make it run richer, meaning you'll be under acceleration for longer. The colder air is, the denser it becomes, and the more power you get (assuming it doesn't go too lean, which is unlikely) If you assume fuel to be a constant, you get more power with colder air, and you accelerate for a shorter time, due to the extra power.

As far as removal of engine fan - if you get stuck in traffic, be careful. If you do only highway driving, there is no reall problem with removing the fan, but if you have stop start driving, be careful. Perhaps fit thermo fans off something?
84 Rangie, 3 inch spring lift, 2 inch body, Megasquirted 4.6, R380, rear Maxi, 34x11.5 JT2s. Simex FM installed.
Posts: 1614
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:44 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by landy_man »

BIg StEvE wrote:
landy_man wrote:are you guys measuring your km's with a gps or off the speedo... because if it is with speedo, dont forget that different tyre sizes will change your speedo reading in km/h and distance travelled...
Yer i reckon i was waiting for someone to bring this up.
yep... with a stock 29" tyre and with 37's now, that is around 30% difference..

So.. Anthony, your figures appear quite good if you were using your odometer and not adding the correction in.
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 12:28 pm
Location: Eastern Sector

Post by mickrangie »

landy_man wrote:are you guys measuring your km's with a gps or off the speedo... because if it is with speedo, dont forget that different tyre sizes will change your speedo reading in km/h and distance travelled...
on 35's and 4.11 diffs my speedo is 100% and with 33 it's 5% under
TD5 96 Discovery UTE.
Posts: 1403
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 7:59 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by DaveS3 »

s3111107@ wrote:Stock 89 3.5 efi with long range tank got 700km from 97ltrs on last trip from Adelaide to Melbourne, loaded with gear = 13.85ltrs per 100 sitting on ave 115km/h

best ive done on highway = 13.3ltrs per 100

around town more like 15 - 20 ltrs

Decent figures reason for not touching anything yet as motor is still very strong after 257,000km
:shock:

13.85 @ 115km/h :shock:

My car would almost be at 1lt - 1km by that stage :rofl:
115km/h Constantly :rofl:

Mick :lol:
Land Rover Discovery - GQ conversion underway
Posts: 1614
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:44 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by landy_man »

mickrangie wrote:
landy_man wrote:are you guys measuring your km's with a gps or off the speedo... because if it is with speedo, dont forget that different tyre sizes will change your speedo reading in km/h and distance travelled...
on 35's and 4.11 diffs my speedo is 100% and with 33 it's 5% under
yeah, but you only have 2 pedal positions... on or off :lol:
and dont really care about economy... well, offroad anyway
Posts: 827
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:52 pm

Post by F'n_Rover »

raginrover wrote:
Hot air = better economy? How the hell do you figure? hot air will make it run richer, meaning you'll be under acceleration for longer. The colder air is, the denser it becomes, and the more power you get (assuming it doesn't go too lean, which is unlikely) If you assume fuel to be a constant, you get more power with colder air, and you accelerate for a shorter time, due to the extra power.

As far as removal of engine fan - if you get stuck in traffic, be careful. If you do only highway driving, there is no reall problem with removing the fan, but if you have stop start driving, be careful. Perhaps fit thermo fans off something?
I could be wrong but this is how i figure it : hot air is less dense than cold air. efi systems will definatly pick up on this and pump less fuel. dont know how carbies deal with the situation. less power = better economy. the air fuel ratio will (should) remain the same but volumetric efficiency will drop hence the drop in power and the increase in economy. Dont know about acceleration but you dont do much on the hwy, mostly constant throttle. FWIW i'd rather have the extra power. i have fitted a vp commo fan - no dramas with overheating (except when i forget to turn it on :oops: )


hijack back on:
Ben wrote:
Military landies are heavier than the same body type in civi - stock for stock. Military landies have a one-ton chassis with extra reinforcing, heavy bullbar, extra axle-tube reinforcing, extra electrics (blackout lights, etc...). A mates stock x-mil IIA (converted to a ute with canvas canopy), tips the scales at 1970kg (with 2 31" spares).
series 2 landies had a completely different chassis to the series3, which could account for the weight differance, also holden mtr.
mine has the same axles as the civi versions + only difference in the chassis is the removable x-member + galvonising afaik. all extra wiring has been removed, as has the bull bar. Bare bones 1300kg is acheivable.
130+ rwhp = yee haaa (yeah i know) :roll:
Ex-Army - SeriesIII -186s - NP435 - Maxi rear - megasquirt coilpack ignition - AM FM radio with 2 X speakers
Posts: 219
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 8:33 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by Ralf the RR »

OK, I'll throw a spanner in the works.

79 RR, 4.4, dual fuel, 31s.

My fuel EFFICIENCY is:
20L/100km on petrol,
20L/100km on gas.
These are a combination of hwy/city.
I don't measure bush figures.

I drive 99% on gas, so my fuel ECONOMY is $10/100km (50c/L)
Harry

79 Rangie (his name is Ralf) 4.4 dual fuel, with plenty of other mods.

Oils leaks are a factory option to prevent rust!
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 11:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by the_grubb »

110 3.9 Isuzu LT85 1.003 3.54 235/85R16

From memory;
Best = 8L / 100 KM
Worst = 13.5L / 100 KM
Average = 9.5l / 100 KM


90 2.8 Isuzu (4JB1-T) ZF auto 1.222 3.54 255/85R16

Between 8 - 9.5L / 100 KM (once again from memory will check when I am home)
I drive 99% on gas, so my fuel ECONOMY is $10/100km (50c/L)
I drive the 90 everywhere so fuel economy is AU$21/100km (£0.969/L, ~2.35 exchange rate)
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 8:12 pm

Post by disco95 »

1995 disco V8
Stock motor and gearing throughout, stock tyre size (geez, I'm almost embarassed to admit that) :lol: :lol:
Average 20l to the 100km pretty much wherever I drive.
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 7:39 pm
Location: 2204

Post by one_iota »

Disco 1995 300Tdi

~Stock sized tyres (BFG AT 235 75 R 15)

Best 9.2l/100km (combination of highway off road and city)

Worst ~11 l / 100km.

Depends on tyre pressures and head winds at "speed" and usually better just after the oil change.
95 3dr 300Tdi Disco,

white, snorkelled, lifted and dash curled.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests