Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

V8 motor for a rockcrawling buggy??

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Posts: 4065
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 8:31 am
Location: ACT

Post by Wendle »

scout392 wrote:I say 6.5. chev turbo diesel.
the problem with diesels is they have a nasty habit of running on their own oil when you get them onto fuct up angles, then they tend to explode violently.

they're not the best for instant wheelspeed from idle either..
Posts: 662
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 8:02 pm
Location: Picton

Post by Tazz »

redzook wrote:
Slunnie wrote:Whats the OPW buggy running?
350 chev im pretty sure
yeh a fairly new 350
Posts: 662
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 8:02 pm
Location: Picton

Post by Tazz »

Wendle wrote:
scout392 wrote:I say 6.5. chev turbo diesel.
the problem with diesels is they have a nasty habit of running on their own oil when you get them onto fuct up angles, then they tend to explode violently.

they're not the best for instant wheelspeed from idle either..
They are way way heavy, and very big $$$$ to rebuild when they thro a rod from running on side or upside down, this is one of the concerns i had with my v8 diesel in a comp rig and why i got rid of it.

Mine for the buggy is worked 308 on straight gas, prob not the lightest but cheap to repair or replace after running on side with no oil pressure one too many times.
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 9:36 pm
Location: Gold Coast

Post by scout392 »

Wendle wrote:
scout392 wrote:I say 6.5. chev turbo diesel.
the problem with diesels is they have a nasty habit of running on their own oil when you get them onto fuct up angles, then they tend to explode violently.

they're not the best for instant wheelspeed from idle either..
Hmmm never heard that before.

Oh well looks like a 350s the go then.

From what i have read the 350 came in a lot of forms, 130hp to 3xx hp and i would imagin there turque curves would be just as vaired.

I guess it would be hard to get a low rpm high torque motor and keep it light as they tend to be large cubes and weight to match.

May be a 383 or 400 sbc?

Eric
78 scout 392ci V8 LPG, 727 TF, dana 20, dana 44 locked and loaded, 9" rear Diff. 10inch lift'n'so on
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: Lara Victoria

Post by Ruffy »

How much power do you need in a buggy????
Go the toyota V8
Posts: 9393
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 11:51 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by antt »

go the bigblock :twisted:

CHEV ZZ 502CI- New Motor. 100% new
Chevrolet ZZ 502CI Motor. Comes with Performance Alloy intake, alloy heads, water pump, harmonic balancer, 4 Bolt, steel crank, forged pistons, forged rods, drive plate. Cost $12000 #512A.Horsepower 502 @ 5200rpm, Torque 567ft lbs @ 4200rpm, compression 9.6:1. 12 months guarantee.
Posts: 2384
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 10:05 am
Location: Brisbane or 169.254.243.241

Post by RaginRover »

Ruffy wrote:How much power do you need in a buggy????
Go the toyota V8
Motors that produce torque earlier would be better - but then I don't know crap about buggies - I know the rover v8 produces torque a lot earlier than the toyota/lexus 1UZ - and you really need to ring its neck to get her going - easy to compare the two try a p38 range rover vs a toyota v8 cruiser
Posts: 3288
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2003 10:15 pm
Location: Central West NSW

Post by Slunnie »

TAZZ wrote:
redzook wrote:
Slunnie wrote:Whats the OPW buggy running?
350 chev im pretty sure
yeh a fairly new 350
Thanks Redzook and Tazz. I was looking at it at the BBM day and PUOSU and it wasn't a motor I'd eyeballed before.
Cheers
Slunnie

Discovery TD5, Landy IIa V8 ute.
Posts: 2186
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:11 pm
Location: Melbourne, now with 1HDFTi power!

Post by +dj_hansen+ »

3.5 Rover with a 4.2 stroker kit and a s/c if your really worried about getting more mumbo :D
Cheers,
Dan.

[i]1996 HDJ80R[/i]
Posts: 4065
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 8:31 am
Location: ACT

Post by Wendle »

anything engine over about 3 litres will work well when it comes down to it. just need to match up gearing accordingly. it is also important to get the stall point in the t/convertor spot on for you particular choice. i think it is way more important having the tranny stall at the right point than having one billion nm.
with whatever motor you choose don't disregard more important things like packaging and reliabilty just to get big numbers on paper.
Posts: 2031
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 10:49 am
Location: On a mission...

Post by Damo »

Wendle wrote: it is also important to get the stall point in the t/convertor spot on for you particular choice. i think it is way more important having the tranny stall at the right point than having one billion nm.
So for the auto-transmission-retards amongst us (myself included :finger: ) how do we go about figuring out what stall point to use?
Posts: 4065
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 8:31 am
Location: ACT

Post by Wendle »

Damo wrote:So for the auto-transmission-retards amongst us (myself included :finger: ) how do we go about figuring out what stall point to use?
i am pretty retarded myself. i ask less retarded people what works for them and try to compare the gearing maths that they have against what i have. eg: commodore 3.8 with t700 works well with t/convertor with a slightly higher stall than stock, this is just a modified commo convertor (not sure on rpm#) but it is a false way of getting more low down torque and crawlabilty, once you go higher than that they use a modified camira convertor, which is taking it a bit far, but should give you a massive launch when driving through brakes. there are a lot of people around with scary amounts of knowledge on this maths..
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 9:36 pm
Location: Gold Coast

Post by scout392 »

A motor that produces xxx torque @1500 rpm will help to lower your real world crawl ratio over a motor that produces the same xxx torque @ a higher ratio.

Let me try to explain (or guess)

A 4wd has let’s say 50 to 1 crawl ratio.
Now if the chose motor that needs to run @ 3000 rpm to produce enough power to climb a given object the @ 6.25mph
Now
If the same 4wd had the same power available @ 1500rpm it could travel at 3.13mph thus doubling your real world crawl ratio.

Eric
78 scout 392ci V8 LPG, 727 TF, dana 20, dana 44 locked and loaded, 9" rear Diff. 10inch lift'n'so on
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 3:04 pm
Location: bind.tk

Post by Jonathan Ferguson »

[b][i][u][color=Orange]LIFE AIN'T WORTH LIVING WHEN YOU DIE BEFORE YOU'RE MEANT TO![/color][/u][/i][/b]
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 9:36 pm
Location: Gold Coast

Post by scout392 »

Jonathan Ferguson wrote:Click & Click
600lbs or 270kgs

M-6007-J58*

5.8L/351 cubic inch – 2V

240 HP @ 3800 RPM

340 ft./lbs. @ 3200 RPM
8.5:1 compression ratio

eric
78 scout 392ci V8 LPG, 727 TF, dana 20, dana 44 locked and loaded, 9" rear Diff. 10inch lift'n'so on
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests