Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

34x9 swampers on GQ on 8's.

Tech Talk for Nissan owners.

Moderators: toaddog, V8Patrol

Post Reply
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

34x9 swampers on GQ on 8's.

Post by bogged »

Anyone running them, or ran them??

Talkin to Darren about them, says they handle like shit on the road, and arent the best option...

Dont really want to go with Q78s due to gearing....

Thanks
Posts: 2832
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:15 pm
Location: Ringwood East, VIC

Post by RoldIT »

Why not LTBs 34"x10.5"?

If I remember correctly you have 4.3 diffs and these will drive 35.5" Q78 no prob. Only problem I find with 36" pedes is in high traction, rocky terrain, 1st low is not quite slow enough to walk it but only just.

Mark's 43% transfer gears for me ...
KRiS
Posts: 13555
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by grimbo »

I run them on Suzuki and no problems with handling etc

I have also used them on a Rangie with no dramas with on road performance.

I have always liked the tall skinny aggresive tyre in Victorian conditions
Ransom note = demand + collage
Posts: 1119
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Melbourne, looking at the hills for snow

Post by LOCKEE »

I ran them on 16 x 6's.

Smaller than your JT's?
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

RoldIT wrote:Why not LTBs 34"x10.5"?

If I remember correctly you have 4.3 diffs and these will drive 35.5" Q78 no prob. Only problem I find with 36" pedes is in high traction, rocky terrain, 1st low is not quite slow enough to walk it but only just.

Mark's 43% transfer gears for me ...
yea 4.3s, but that brings it = for 33's. Bigger I just go back to square 1 suffering lack of hp..
the 34x10.5 maybe an optino hadnt thought of them.
Marks gear woudl be nice, but again I think normal low range is really handy sometimes.

grimbo wrote:I run them on Suzuki and no problems with handling etc

I have also used them on a Rangie with no dramas with on road performance.

I have always liked the tall skinny aggresive tyre in Victorian conditions
Dont suppose u have run em on ya GQ? :D
I was told they sux on large 4b's, btu then Rangie is large 4b.


LOCKEE wrote:I ran them on 16 x 6's.
Smaller than your JT's?
The 34x9s how did you find them on the GQ?
Posts: 1781
Joined: Mon May 17, 2004 10:01 pm
Location: Geelong

Post by beretta »

I got 33 12.5 swampers, they actually measure 34", I find them a lot better than the 35 muddies I had before as far as gearing goes. I've got standard 4.10's and find them pretty good.
Like driving down the road on tractor tyres, I like it but the Mrs gets a bit edgy about driving on them. From my limited experience with "extreme" tyres I was suprised how hard the side walls are, even after dropping heaps of air out they still looked like they had 40psi in em.
Posts: 2832
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:15 pm
Location: Ringwood East, VIC

Post by RoldIT »

bogged wrote:
RoldIT wrote:Why not LTBs 34"x10.5"?

If I remember correctly you have 4.3 diffs and these will drive 35.5" Q78 no prob. Only problem I find with 36" pedes is in high traction, rocky terrain, 1st low is not quite slow enough to walk it but only just.

Mark's 43% transfer gears for me ...
yea 4.3s, but that brings it = for 33's. Bigger I just go back to square 1 suffering lack of hp..
the 34x10.5 maybe an optino hadnt thought of them.
Marks gear woudl be nice, but again I think normal low range is really handy sometimes.
The change from current gearing on 33" to Q78s is only about 7.5% increase. I'd be surprised if you even notice. As for me, I'm only running 4.1s with 265/75xR16 then go to 36" pede the ratio changes by about 15%. On road, noticable but I can deal with it as they are only part time tyres, offroad I reckon I've lost a full low range gear (never actually worked it out) which is pretty much what I think Mark's 43% gears will correct plus a bit extra. As far as normal low range goes, if it's too slow, use 2nd where you used to use 1st.
KRiS
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

RoldIT wrote:The change from current gearing on 33" to Q78s is only about 7.5% increase. I'd be surprised if you even notice.
Remember Mines Auto. Going from 31 - 33 was fucked.. Lots different to the manual.. :(
I reckon I've lost a full low range gear (never actually worked it out) which is pretty much what I think Mark's 43% gears will correct plus a bit extra. As far as normal low range goes, if it's too slow, use 2nd where you used to use 1st.
Auto :(
Posts: 1119
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Melbourne, looking at the hills for snow

Post by LOCKEE »

Ran them on Rovers only but were okay, GQ Diffs are too big for a little tyre.

33 x 12.5 TSL Same OD would be my choice or a 34 JT2.
Posts: 2832
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:15 pm
Location: Ringwood East, VIC

Post by RoldIT »

bogged wrote:
RoldIT wrote:The change from current gearing on 33" to Q78s is only about 7.5% increase. I'd be surprised if you even notice.
Remember Mines Auto. Going from 31 - 33 was *****.. Lots different to the manual.. :(
I reckon I've lost a full low range gear (never actually worked it out) which is pretty much what I think Mark's 43% gears will correct plus a bit extra. As far as normal low range goes, if it's too slow, use 2nd where you used to use 1st.
Auto :(
Fair cop ...

Anyway, 34x9 is a very skinny tyre. Guy in Yarra Valley ran them on a shorty GQ for a while and to my knowledge didn't have a problem but personally, on 8" rims I'd be going a 10.5 or wider tyre myself. Especially if you don't like reseating beads in the mud ...
KRiS
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

LOCKEE wrote:Ran them on Rovers only but were okay, GQ Diffs are too big for a little tyre.

33 x 12.5 TSL Same OD would be my choice or a 34 JT2.
so what would be better 34x10.5 LTB or 33x12.5 TSL?
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:43 am
Location: Wangaratta

Post by Guy »

bogged wrote:
LOCKEE wrote:Ran them on Rovers only but were okay, GQ Diffs are too big for a little tyre.

33 x 12.5 TSL Same OD would be my choice or a 34 JT2.
so what would be better 34x10.5 LTB or 33x12.5 TSL?
The TSL hands down on a heavier truck .. The LTB on a light lux or Zuk
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

love_mud wrote:
bogged wrote:
LOCKEE wrote:Ran them on Rovers only but were okay, GQ Diffs are too big for a little tyre.

33 x 12.5 TSL Same OD would be my choice or a 34 JT2.
so what would be better 34x10.5 LTB or 33x12.5 TSL?
The TSL hands down on a heavier truck .. The LTB on a light lux or Zuk
yea just readin about em.. shame, good size by the looks of it :(
Posts: 1781
Joined: Mon May 17, 2004 10:01 pm
Location: Geelong

Post by beretta »

33X12.5 are great, mine are on 15x8 rockcrawlers from Procomp......want to buy mine bogged? That'll save me workin out how to get em up to Sydney then! :D
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests