Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

suspension question with kindergarten pics

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Posts: 2149
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 6:59 pm
Location: gold coast, australia

suspension question with kindergarten pics

Post by NICK »

this is your basic A-frame setup, like POS and afew others have.
TECH SCREW GURU
Posts: 16934
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 6:57 pm

Post by RUFF »

Yes you are right.

I love when tech questions are answerd so easy


Next Question :finger:
Posts: 2149
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 6:59 pm
Location: gold coast, australia

Post by NICK »

now my question is, will this design be as effect and will it work?

In a hilux it is hard to run a good coil setup with out removing the fuel tank, which i really dont want to do. I have looked at calbahs and dont believe theres works all that well and think that this maybe a better fix.
TECH SCREW GURU
Posts: 2149
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 6:59 pm
Location: gold coast, australia

Post by NICK »

RUFF wrote:Yes you are right.

I love when tech questions are answerd so easy


Next Question :finger:




see above :finger: :finger: :finger:


NICK
TECH SCREW GURU
Posts: 2388
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 10:20 pm
Location: bacabugari

Post by big red »

how about a panhard rod instead of the "A" frame
[url=http://bigred.redbubble.com/][color=red][b]You can follow me but its gunna hurt ![/b][/color][/url]
event pics http://bigred.redbubble.com/
Posts: 2149
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 6:59 pm
Location: gold coast, australia

Post by NICK »

yeah that has crossed my mind and seems like the easy option but from what i have seen coil suspension seems to work better without a panhard.

NICK
TECH SCREW GURU
Posts: 1208
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:21 pm
Location: sunshine coast

Post by killalux »

looks to me like it might not be real strong, but i could be wrong
Posts: 11892
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:53 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by N*A*M »

i think it will work fine if you build it well.

the a-frame is supposed to stop wrap and to prevent lateral diff movement. whether symmetrical or assymetrical, it should still do so.

bill forrest on the pirate did this and it worked.
Posts: 1435
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 8:22 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Adman »

The second design will not sufficiently prevent lateral movement of the axle.

Have you thought of triangulating the lower links at the chassis and running your upper links parallel ?

Cheers
Adman
Posts: 15549
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:23 am
Location: Your Mummas House!

Post by bj on roids »

Adman wrote:The second design will not sufficiently prevent lateral movement of the axle.

Have you thought of triangulating the lower links at the chassis and running your upper links parallel ?

Cheers
Adman


I think this might be better for you nick, cross the lower two over and mount say off your bash plate, even incorporate a skid for your rear diff or tailshaft.

run paralell uppers. or waht about converging the upper a-frame to the chassis and not over the diff?
hands and mums dont count!!!
Posts: 15549
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:23 am
Location: Your Mummas House!

Post by bj on roids »

N*A*M wrote:i think it will work fine if you build it well.

the a-frame is supposed to stop wrap and to prevent lateral diff movement. whether symmetrical or assymetrical, it should still do so.

bill forrest on the pirate did this and it worked.

that one pissy link wont stop side to side all that well.....
hands and mums dont count!!!
Posts: 3523
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 8:42 pm
Location: Somewhere they can't reach me, shoot me or electrocute me...

Post by Area54 »

Hve you thought of a Watts linkage instead of a panhard?
Built, not bought.
Posts: 13555
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:28 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by grimbo »

I know you said you didn't want to remove the fuel tank but it seem by doing that you can set the suspension up in a tried and true method. Moving or replacing your fuel tank with say a fuel cell might be the simpler mod than trying to work around it
Ransom note = demand + collage
User avatar
Guy
Posts: 10366
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 8:43 am
Location: Wangaratta

Post by Guy »

That setup is very similar to the A frame 3 link rear that Spidertrax in the US do for the Zuks .. If the upper link is well made it should hold together.. but a properly triangulated upper would be preferable..

Also if you are goin that deep into the mods, you may as well move that tank and centre it under the vehicle blah blah blah ...
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Posts: 1767
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Just Near Fraser Island

Post by Maggot4x4 »

Have a look at these and see what you think.

And if it is a early Hilux a GQ tank fits behind the rear X member.
[quote="Wooders"]If ya want a 4x4 camry go ahead & buy a Patrol or Cruiser.[/quote]Rangie with 80s LC diffs, Isuzu 4bd1, Twin ARB lockers, 8000lb Hi mount warn, 315x75x16 Procomp XTerrains
Posts: 1767
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Just Near Fraser Island

Post by Maggot4x4 »

2 more
[quote="Wooders"]If ya want a 4x4 camry go ahead & buy a Patrol or Cruiser.[/quote]Rangie with 80s LC diffs, Isuzu 4bd1, Twin ARB lockers, 8000lb Hi mount warn, 315x75x16 Procomp XTerrains
Posts: 1040
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2002 11:15 am
Location: sydney

Post by planb »

i have seen a conventional a frame used in a coiled 4runner, where the tank remained in the normal position and the A frame mounted to the standard mounts on the crossmember for the og upper arms.

the a frame reached over the axle and was tied in from behind. looked wierd but worked real well.
Posts: 615
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 4:59 pm
Location: Geelong Vic

Post by Ruggers »

have you seen the panhard rod set up on a falcon it keeps the diff centred even when raised or lowered. as it works by having two rods runing from the sides to a piviot in the middle of the diff. they work really effectly
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 7:44 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by MKPatrolGuy »

Ruggers wrote:have you seen the panhard rod set up on a falcon it keeps the diff centred even when raised or lowered. as it works by having two rods runing from the sides to a piviot in the middle of the diff. they work really effectly


That is the Watts linkage Area54 was talking about.
[size=100][url=http://www.vickrawlers.com/]VicKrawlers.com[/url]
[url=http://www.drfwdc.org.au/]Dandenong Ranges 4wd Club[/url][/size]
Posts: 9393
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 11:51 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by antt »

this is the watts linkage

Image
Posts: 16934
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 6:57 pm

Post by RUFF »

Nick cant realy move the tank because he has bobbed his body and there is not enough room behind the diff. This is in a 4runner.


Antt that is an Airbag Set up is it?
Whats it in?
Posts: 2149
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 6:59 pm
Location: gold coast, australia

Post by NICK »

RUFF wrote:Nick cant realy move the tank because he has bobbed his body and there is not enough room behind the diff. This is in a 4runner.


Antt that is an Airbag Set up is it?
Whats it in?



what ruff said, that is my main reason for not moving the tank, i have a tank that will fit in the back but it is only 40L and i fell that it puts to much weight behind the diff.

NICK
TECH SCREW GURU
Posts: 1559
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 2:35 pm
Location: Captain Creek QLD

Post by Bush65 »

Adman wrote:The second design will not sufficiently prevent lateral movement of the axle.

Have you thought of triangulating the lower links at the chassis and running your upper links parallel ?

Cheers
Adman


I agree with the 1st comment.

The disadvantage of triangulated lower links and parallel upper links is a lower roll centre. That could be worse than disadvantage of panhard bar.
John
Posts: 9393
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 11:51 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by antt »

yep ruff, its a bag setup, its in the back of this lux

Image
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 10:25 am
Location: Canberra

Post by Roktruk »

Interesting looking set up. How come you've used the watts link as well as 4 control arms? It looks like this would limit articulation , but I suppose it keeps the diff centred under the vehicle.
Posts: 9393
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 11:51 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by antt »

Roktruk wrote:Interesting looking set up. How come you've used the watts link as well as 4 control arms? It looks like this would limit articulation , but I suppose it keeps the diff centred under the vehicle.


it's not meant for articulation, it's in the back of that lux that i posted a pic of. the only reason the lower control arms are there are to mount the airbags to, to create a cantaliever setup to get bigger lift out of the rear bags. i'll try and find a pic with the back fully inflated
Posts: 15549
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:23 am
Location: Your Mummas House!

Post by bj on roids »

antt wrote:
Roktruk wrote:Interesting looking set up. How come you've used the watts link as well as 4 control arms? It looks like this would limit articulation , but I suppose it keeps the diff centred under the vehicle.


it's not meant for articulation, it's in the back of that lux that i posted a pic of. the only reason the lower control arms are there are to mount the airbags to, to create a cantaliever setup to get bigger lift out of the rear bags. i'll try and find a pic with the back fully inflated

with the triangulated uppers what is the sense in having the panhard rod? just out of curisoity?
hands and mums dont count!!!
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 7:44 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by MKPatrolGuy »

bj on roids wrote:
antt wrote:
Roktruk wrote:Interesting looking set up. How come you've used the watts link as well as 4 control arms? It looks like this would limit articulation , but I suppose it keeps the diff centred under the vehicle.


it's not meant for articulation, it's in the back of that lux that i posted a pic of. the only reason the lower control arms are there are to mount the airbags to, to create a cantaliever setup to get bigger lift out of the rear bags. i'll try and find a pic with the back fully inflated

with the triangulated uppers what is the sense in having the panhard rod? just out of curisoity?


I was just thinking the same thing...
[size=100][url=http://www.vickrawlers.com/]VicKrawlers.com[/url]
[url=http://www.drfwdc.org.au/]Dandenong Ranges 4wd Club[/url][/size]
Posts: 1040
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2002 11:15 am
Location: sydney

Post by planb »

all for show, just like the lowered lux
Posts: 9393
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 11:51 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by antt »

planb wrote:all for show, just like the lowered lux


thats what i think planb, i've never seen another airbagged truck anywhere with a watts link.....just something different i spose
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests