Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
suspension question with kindergarten pics
Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators
suspension question with kindergarten pics
this is your basic A-frame setup, like POS and afew others have.
TECH SCREW GURU
now my question is, will this design be as effect and will it work?
In a hilux it is hard to run a good coil setup with out removing the fuel tank, which i really dont want to do. I have looked at calbahs and dont believe theres works all that well and think that this maybe a better fix.
In a hilux it is hard to run a good coil setup with out removing the fuel tank, which i really dont want to do. I have looked at calbahs and dont believe theres works all that well and think that this maybe a better fix.
TECH SCREW GURU
Adman wrote:The second design will not sufficiently prevent lateral movement of the axle.
Have you thought of triangulating the lower links at the chassis and running your upper links parallel ?
Cheers
Adman
I think this might be better for you nick, cross the lower two over and mount say off your bash plate, even incorporate a skid for your rear diff or tailshaft.
run paralell uppers. or waht about converging the upper a-frame to the chassis and not over the diff?
hands and mums dont count!!!
N*A*M wrote:i think it will work fine if you build it well.
the a-frame is supposed to stop wrap and to prevent lateral diff movement. whether symmetrical or assymetrical, it should still do so.
bill forrest on the pirate did this and it worked.
that one pissy link wont stop side to side all that well.....
hands and mums dont count!!!
That setup is very similar to the A frame 3 link rear that Spidertrax in the US do for the Zuks .. If the upper link is well made it should hold together.. but a properly triangulated upper would be preferable..
Also if you are goin that deep into the mods, you may as well move that tank and centre it under the vehicle blah blah blah ...
Also if you are goin that deep into the mods, you may as well move that tank and centre it under the vehicle blah blah blah ...
" If governments are involved in the covering up the knowledge of aliens, Then they are doing a much better job of it than they do of everything else "
Have a look at these and see what you think.
And if it is a early Hilux a GQ tank fits behind the rear X member.
And if it is a early Hilux a GQ tank fits behind the rear X member.
[quote="Wooders"]If ya want a 4x4 camry go ahead & buy a Patrol or Cruiser.[/quote]Rangie with 80s LC diffs, Isuzu 4bd1, Twin ARB lockers, 8000lb Hi mount warn, 315x75x16 Procomp XTerrains
Ruggers wrote:have you seen the panhard rod set up on a falcon it keeps the diff centred even when raised or lowered. as it works by having two rods runing from the sides to a piviot in the middle of the diff. they work really effectly
That is the Watts linkage Area54 was talking about.
[size=100][url=http://www.vickrawlers.com/]VicKrawlers.com[/url]
[url=http://www.drfwdc.org.au/]Dandenong Ranges 4wd Club[/url][/size]
[url=http://www.drfwdc.org.au/]Dandenong Ranges 4wd Club[/url][/size]
RUFF wrote:Nick cant realy move the tank because he has bobbed his body and there is not enough room behind the diff. This is in a 4runner.
Antt that is an Airbag Set up is it?
Whats it in?
what ruff said, that is my main reason for not moving the tank, i have a tank that will fit in the back but it is only 40L and i fell that it puts to much weight behind the diff.
NICK
TECH SCREW GURU
Adman wrote:The second design will not sufficiently prevent lateral movement of the axle.
Have you thought of triangulating the lower links at the chassis and running your upper links parallel ?
Cheers
Adman
I agree with the 1st comment.
The disadvantage of triangulated lower links and parallel upper links is a lower roll centre. That could be worse than disadvantage of panhard bar.
John
Roktruk wrote:Interesting looking set up. How come you've used the watts link as well as 4 control arms? It looks like this would limit articulation , but I suppose it keeps the diff centred under the vehicle.
it's not meant for articulation, it's in the back of that lux that i posted a pic of. the only reason the lower control arms are there are to mount the airbags to, to create a cantaliever setup to get bigger lift out of the rear bags. i'll try and find a pic with the back fully inflated
antt wrote:Roktruk wrote:Interesting looking set up. How come you've used the watts link as well as 4 control arms? It looks like this would limit articulation , but I suppose it keeps the diff centred under the vehicle.
it's not meant for articulation, it's in the back of that lux that i posted a pic of. the only reason the lower control arms are there are to mount the airbags to, to create a cantaliever setup to get bigger lift out of the rear bags. i'll try and find a pic with the back fully inflated
with the triangulated uppers what is the sense in having the panhard rod? just out of curisoity?
hands and mums dont count!!!
bj on roids wrote:antt wrote:Roktruk wrote:Interesting looking set up. How come you've used the watts link as well as 4 control arms? It looks like this would limit articulation , but I suppose it keeps the diff centred under the vehicle.
it's not meant for articulation, it's in the back of that lux that i posted a pic of. the only reason the lower control arms are there are to mount the airbags to, to create a cantaliever setup to get bigger lift out of the rear bags. i'll try and find a pic with the back fully inflated
with the triangulated uppers what is the sense in having the panhard rod? just out of curisoity?
I was just thinking the same thing...
[size=100][url=http://www.vickrawlers.com/]VicKrawlers.com[/url]
[url=http://www.drfwdc.org.au/]Dandenong Ranges 4wd Club[/url][/size]
[url=http://www.drfwdc.org.au/]Dandenong Ranges 4wd Club[/url][/size]
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests