Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Is this correct for gq's/mavs

Tech Talk for Nissan owners.

Moderators: toaddog, V8Patrol

Post Reply
msh
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 12:08 am
Location: Melbourne

Is this correct for gq's/mavs

Post by msh »

All TB4.2 autos, both Patrols and Mavs
1st 2.784:1
Low 2.020:1
Diff 3.9:1
Patrols came with either 265/70 r16's or 10r15's, basically same diameter,
but Mavs had 215/80 r16 nearly an inch smaller, so how did they compensate, did they just mess with the speedo or is this info wrong?

Got the info from the RACV website, I would have thought their info would have been fairly correct.
Posts: 6411
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Post by Beastmavster »

No its wrong.
Posts: 736
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:25 pm
Location: Redcliffe, Brisbane

Post by chops »

all models have a final drive ratio of 4.111:1 except the patrol ST and Ti models equipped with a manual transmission, 3 litre models and Maverick XL models. The 3 litre model has a ratio of 4.375:1 and the ST, Ti and XL models have a ratio of 3.900:1
1988 351W GQ wagon
msh
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 12:08 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by msh »

Hmm, now I'm confused, just when I thought I was starting to understand the diff combos.
I'm a little slow, what auto tb42s had 4.1's.
I have been looking at car yards, and haven't seen any auto tb42s with 4.1's yet, only the 3.9's.
User avatar
rOd
Posts: 804
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 7:35 am
Location: In the shadows

Post by rOd »

msh wrote: what auto tb42s had 4.1's.
.
None. All have 3.9s.
Dont expect mere proof to sway my opinion.
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:39 pm
Location: In a horse near you

Post by chimpboy »

I thought all the autos had 3.9s as well, but maybe I just pulled that out of my arse.

But anyway the manuals vary more than that; I've had two mavericks that both came stock with a manual transmisson and 3.9:1 final drive. And Mavs have TB42s, no smaller engines.

Then again there are also lots of stock Mavs with 4.1:1 diffs and manual transmissions.

(Just on this as well, 3.9:1 diffs and 33" tyres are FANTASTIC with a petrol 4.2. I was expecting the car to be a real dog with the 33s on because of stuff I had read here, but now I can only conclude that it was all from people with diesel motors. The ratios are just right now. It pulls well, and it's stilll low-geared enough that I can take off in second gear if I'm feeling lazy, but it doesn't have that "in 1st gear for 0.1 seconds" feel any more.

Jason
This is not legal advice.
msh
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 12:08 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by msh »

chimpboy wrote:I thought all the autos had 3.9s as well, but maybe I just pulled that out of my arse.
That's what I thought as well, so if all autos had 3.9's how did they compensate for for the differing tyre sizes?
Did they just adjust speedo settings?
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 7:44 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by MKPatrolGuy »

msh wrote:
chimpboy wrote:I thought all the autos had 3.9s as well, but maybe I just pulled that out of my arse.
That's what I thought as well, so if all autos had 3.9's how did they compensate for for the differing tyre sizes?
Did they just adjust speedo settings?
Yep, just different speedo drive gears.
[size=100][url=http://www.vickrawlers.com/]VicKrawlers.com[/url]
[url=http://www.drfwdc.org.au/]Dandenong Ranges 4wd Club[/url][/size]
msh
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 12:08 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by msh »

Cool, thats what I wanted to know.
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

chimpboy wrote:I thought all the autos had 3.9s as well, but maybe I just pulled that out of my arse.
*waves hand in air*

My Diesel Auto had 4.1's standard... Mates manual of same month/yr had 4.1's...

me thinks it has to do with what they have in stock at the time of building... there seems to be no set standard of gearing.
msh
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 12:08 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by msh »

Surely there would have been a set standard, they can't be that crazy to just whack in what was laying around.

My research was done on only LWB's autos, I came up with all petrol autos with 3.9's, and diesel auto's with 4.1's, can't really comment on manuals.

I would have thought that the auto's would have had a better diff ratio since 1st is geared so high.

Thanks guys.

(I didn't mean to start the diff debate, I was just wondering about the speedo gearing)
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

msh wrote:and diesel auto's with 4.1's, can't really comment on manuals.
and just when you thought it was safe to go back into the diff.. other GQ TD42 GQ I know had 3.9's... I stand by my prevoius statement
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 7:44 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by MKPatrolGuy »

When you purchased one new, you could probably tick a box to pick which ratio you wanted.
[size=100][url=http://www.vickrawlers.com/]VicKrawlers.com[/url]
[url=http://www.drfwdc.org.au/]Dandenong Ranges 4wd Club[/url][/size]
Posts: 792
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:20 pm
Location: Acting the goat.

Post by BowTieGQ »

Mine's a manual, petrol Ti with 4.1's.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests