N*A*M wrote:round 3 cancelled? shiet... now i'll never have motivation to fix that rim.
looks like we'll have some training time up in berridale instead.
Hmmmmm, good Idea
Mock
Moderator: evanstaniland
N*A*M wrote:round 3 cancelled? shiet... now i'll never have motivation to fix that rim.
looks like we'll have some training time up in berridale instead.
In Tryers Class diff gears are allowed but t-case gears aren't. Different Makes have differing amounts of options as in some models don't have any diff gear options and some don't have any t-case options. How about instead of looking at gears you look at the overall crawl ratio? Isn't that what is more important? Maybe something like more than and less than 60:1 as an idea.Guts wrote:No matter how you define classes there will always be something that is unfair for somebody.
As for the gears, my rockhopper gears give me approx 90:1, dual cases with stock gers in both give basicly the same. So if gears are allowed but duals aren`t its not fair.
cool, I can not use an air locker but I can't not use my t/case gears. Is tyre size based on actual size or what is marked on the tyre?Webbie wrote:These rules are not concrete at this point in time we are looking at one exemption per class poa ie,gears or motor or tyres.
that sounds like a great idea although I think tye size and difflock rule should not be exempted. although I think that for stock class a good rule would be tyre size capped at 31" for all vehicles or 31" for suzuki and 33" for larger vehicles so that all vehicles are allowed to run equal tyre/size diff clearance no matter what vehicle.Webbie wrote:These rules are not concrete at this point in time we are looking at one exemption per class poa ie,gears or motor or tyres.
Transfer gears and duals will stay in Challenge. You can not run an event by saying if you are under bla bla final ratio you are in bla bla class or bla bla2 class if you are over that. Some people would say they have 4.11 diff gears when in fact they have 5.29`s and it would just take to much time to check every rig.cj wrote:In Tryers Class diff gears are allowed but t-case gears aren't. Different Makes have differing amounts of options as in some models don't have any diff gear options and some don't have any t-case options. How about instead of looking at gears you look at the overall crawl ratio? Isn't that what is more important? Maybe something like more than and less than 60:1 as an idea.Guts wrote:No matter how you define classes there will always be something that is unfair for somebody.
As for the gears, my rockhopper gears give me approx 90:1, dual cases with stock gers in both give basicly the same. So if gears are allowed but duals aren`t its not fair.
Also I think Gary's suggestion for Stock Class of allowing up to 2" increase in tyre size as per the NCOP is not all bad or maybe it should be more like 2" total lift overall as per the NCOP allows before engineering becomes an issue.
Either way I think the event concept is a great idea and anything is better than nothing. Looking forward to it.
If you can't check diff ratios then how are you going to check t-case gears? Forget what I posted before as I don't have anyGuts wrote:Transfer gears and duals will stay in Challenge. You can not run an event by saying if you are under bla bla final ratio you are in bla bla class or bla bla2 class if you are over that. Some people would say they have 4.11 diff gears when in fact they have 5.29`s and it would just take to much time to check every rig.cj wrote:In Tryers Class diff gears are allowed but t-case gears aren't. Different Makes have differing amounts of options as in some models don't have any diff gear options and some don't have any t-case options. How about instead of looking at gears you look at the overall crawl ratio? Isn't that what is more important? Maybe something like more than and less than 60:1 as an idea.Guts wrote:No matter how you define classes there will always be something that is unfair for somebody.
As for the gears, my rockhopper gears give me approx 90:1, dual cases with stock gers in both give basicly the same. So if gears are allowed but duals aren`t its not fair.
Also I think Gary's suggestion for Stock Class of allowing up to 2" increase in tyre size as per the NCOP is not all bad or maybe it should be more like 2" total lift overall as per the NCOP allows before engineering becomes an issue.
Either way I think the event concept is a great idea and anything is better than nothing. Looking forward to it.
okz00k wrote:Re vehicle classes, why not stick with CCDA classes. They are well defined in the CCDA FWD Manual of Motorsport. Click Here to download a copy.
As the Willowglen people found, they cater pretty well for a good range of vehicles.
Let's not keep re-inventing vehicle specs for each different event. If the current CCDA specs don't cater for all our vehicle types, then let's get the standard class definitions updated so they do.
Stick to a set of standards - saves a lot of mucking around and trying to sort out your own variation.
... I don't like being left behind.HG wrote:Holly hell Kris I thought your beast had a locker shoved in it for sure ..... now I'm really impressed with your drive we all did ages ago around Willow Grove area (Burgess track I think it was). There were some big rocks mixed with mud and some big off camber stuff too and I don't think you had a drama getting up and over any of the tracks done that night...................... " hand clenched in fist" Respect
Different suspension mounting points so you`ll be in challenge with me, and NO you will NOT get a specail ruling to run in tryers class even thow you are only ever going to be a tryerHG wrote:You beauty no one has noticed me ......... does that mean i'm a tryer
.................. either way this will be fun.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 0 guests