Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Auto or maunal??

General Tech Talk

Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators

Posts: 2183
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: newy

Auto or maunal??

Post by evanstaniland »

if building a comp truck with dual transfers would it be better to go auto or manual or does it just come down to personal choice.
as i like driving manual but i know that auto is better for crawling

but when looking it seems as tho you could get a lower crawl ratio with a manual or is it just me not reading properly

GU 3.0 turbo diesel manual with STD transfer case ratios
1st Gear Ratio 4.262:1
Low Range Ratio 2.02:1
Diff Ratio 4.375:1
Final Drive Ratio 37.66:1

GU 3.0 turbo diesel auto with STD transfer case ratios
1st Gear Ratio 2.784:1
Low Range Ratio 2.02:1
Diff Ratio 4.375:1
Final Drive Ratio 24.6:1

and yes looking at nissan running gear!

Evan...
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 5:09 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by jessie928 »

there really isnt a chioce

go auto, gives you a free arm, a free leg and easyer point and shoot driving

Jes
ATTACH BROKEN TOYOTA HERE--->
DUCATI <-----Worlds best warning label
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 5:09 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by jessie928 »

oh and then there is the torque multiplication factor of the auto aswell :)
ATTACH BROKEN TOYOTA HERE--->
DUCATI <-----Worlds best warning label
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

I don't think too many people with dual transfers are that concerned about getting first-low-low slow enough.

Go the auto.

Scott
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 7:15 pm

Post by hilux_bondy_007 »

if u go auto ur not a driver all u are is a steerer... not a driver. so manaul no matter wat
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 9:34 am
Location: LAUNCESTON, TASMANIA

Post by roverlux »

IMHO auto is cool. better off road. full manual valve body with B&M or hurst shifter. you can bang up/down the gears quick as withour losing momentum by depressing clutch and changing gear. i have manual hilux and it blows A$$! I want a 700R4!

Joe.
want in one hand, crap in the other..... see which one gets full first.
Posts: 361
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Western Australia

Post by toyrex »

Go manual
Auto is for interlectualy impared people that lack the ability with there hand foot coordination

Adrian
Posts: 1175
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 10:17 pm
Location: Mirboo North

Post by 6.5 rangie »

How come the auto replies are good and informative, whereas the manual drivers are not.
Go the auto for ease of driving
Posts: 6221
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 12:51 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by v840 »

Driven alot of rock (no comps though) using auto and manual boxes. Auto wins hands down. Easier to control the throttle, dont have to worry about gear changing in a precarious position, torque multiplication, no more burning clutch smell, the list goes on.
IMO auto wins hands down. The only time a manual is better is on a steep decline but low gearing and sparing use of the brakes can overcome this anyway.
Everything I have driven with an auto I have also driven in a manual for all those who think auto drivers cant drive :finger: but the auto provides an easier, more enjoyable experience.
JMO
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|.........SUZUKI..........| ||'|";, ____.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ]
(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

hilux_bondy_007 wrote:if u go auto ur not a driver all u are is a steerer... not a driver. so manaul no matter wat
Learn to type. You have a full sized keyboard, so you don't need to use these stupid SMS style shorthand abbreviations which only make your posts more difficult to read on a full size screen.

Learn to capitalise properly, and perhaps research punctuation.

Learn to spell - "manaul" and "wat"?

Then do some research into the pros and cons of using automatic transmissions for serious offroad driving, and come back and provide sensible, rational arguments supporting your otherwise inane assertions based on too many years following the "ricer" scene.

My 2c.

Scott
Last edited by -Scott- on Tue Jun 20, 2006 8:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Posts: 14209
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Adelaide

Post by -Scott- »

toyrex wrote:Go manual
Auto is for interlectualy impared people that lack the ability with there hand foot coordination

Adrian
People who live in glass houses. :roll:

intellectually

impaired

their

And it's got nothing to do with hand-foot coordination.

Scott
Posts: 181
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 4:37 pm
Location: melbourne

Auto or manual??

Post by swamp »

IMO auto is easier to drive in hard situations, inclines probably the area where they really shine.
Where a manual is so much better is fast loose tight gravel,more rally car stuff.But so much more fun than an auto.
out of my mind, back soon.
Posts: 2183
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: newy

Post by evanstaniland »

so if its going ot be mainly built for comping but will also be used for daily driver (untill i can afford a street car) it would be best going auto!!

evan..
Posts: 2601
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: warner, brisbane

Post by chunderlicious »

For mud and loose flat dirt...... manual as its more fun to do donut in a manual with it bouncing off the limiter.
auto is better for everything else. i prefer manual as it gives me something to do while im driving (i think i have A.D.D.) but i know auto will be better
turbos are nice but i'd rather be blown
Posts: 2910
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 4:32 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by -Mick- »

:rofl: @ scott :lol:

Auto without question for serious technical driving. FAR more control. For a daily driver and tourer I prefer a manual but even then an auto is probably better......... its just a preference :)

Autos do sap a bit of power but unlikely to be a real issue in front of a decent turbo diesel........ I'm sure the 3.0 would be ok.
Posts: 2183
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: newy

Post by evanstaniland »

it will most likely be behind a commador V6 or V8!!
what do you mean by sap power??

Evan..
Posts: 2910
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 4:32 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by -Mick- »

I simply mean you can't dump the clutch and lose a little bit of responsiveness :) Would not be an issue behind a v8 etc because there's plenty of torque there to compensate.

Its only a problem in cars like mine with a little petrol engine that would struggle enough behind a manual.......... every little bit helps and the auto hurts it. Commy 6 or v8 no worries at all, you'll be good :D

You do probably lose a bit more outright horsepower through an auto than a manual too but again if you've got enough there you'll never know the difference. Say if you lose an extra 10 hp what do you care if you've got 150 or 200 hp total. My car has less than 100 hp to start so I really miss that extra 10 hp............ hope I made sense :lol:
Posts: 2183
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 4:15 pm
Location: newy

Post by evanstaniland »

yea thanks i understood that...i think :)

Evan..
Posts: 1578
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:27 am
Location: In The Good Country

Post by sudso »

I think the answer is conclusive ;)

Dont the majority of comp guys use auto's these days and the rest are swinging that way?
Bordertrek 4X4 & Fabrication
0400 250 734 Bordertown SA
I love terra firma-the less firma the more terra
Posts: 3278
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 9:03 pm
Location: St Helena, Melbourne.

Post by Loanrangie »

-Scott- wrote:
toyrex wrote:Go manual
Auto is for interlectualy impared people that lack the ability with there hand foot coordination

Adrian
People who live in glass houses. :roll:

intellectually

impaired

their

And it's got nothing to do with hand-foot coordination.

Scott
Ha , i was thinking the same, i think he needs an auto so the other hand can spell for him :D
Saddle up tonto, its the not so loanrangie! . 98 TDI DISCO lightly modded with more to come.
Posts: 1508
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 9:48 am

Post by MQ080 »

I take it you want to do hard stuff? Then you need anything that will give you more control... auto is the go!
Posts: 4275
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 2:12 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by ozy1 »

okay, my point of view,

i have 2 GQ's, one is a 4.2L Turbo Diesel manual LWB, and is a 4.2L petrol auto SWB, bot have lockers and rockhoppers, and since stretching the SWB the whell bases arnt that much different,

now, the auto is my comptruck, i do enjoy the manual for all driving, off road it is fine, it climbs really well, and drives excellent,

but the auto wins off road,

there are times where you want to nudge a ledge and put the front wheel over slowly, once the clutch is out, that is it, you need to keep it from stalling, but with the auto, you can use both feet to crawl it over at a tenth of the speed of the manual,

if your stuck in mud, and you need to select reverse, theres possibility of water entering the clutch and it will shit its self, some comps have mud, so its another thing to think about,
Posts: 502
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:09 pm
Location: Cairns

Post by fnqcairns »

A manual will behave as well as and better than an auto if one has taken the time to learn driving techniques like heel n toe. Two feet but three pedals ends up instinctively as if there is only two pedals but the car is controlled 3 ways, in the right hands the control can become finite almost.

A person actually has more control with this technique than in any auto as the cars becomes not just a go or slow affair but can be ridden entirely for the want of a better way to say it.
It's worth the possible burnt clutches and constant stalling to try and master it. I never mastered it but I learnt it years ago and it is fun. Tried to do it a couple of weeks ago on some rocky patches in the GQ - all I can say is the ability is easier to lose than learn.
But for the average person who will drive comp (or anything 4wd) with around the same skill set they learnt in the burbs an auto is probably the go.

cheers fnq
*JUST LUV IT* 96 GQ LWB TD4.2, Cav, Kings, Dobinsons, Motorguard, Enginesaver, 400 pro, Cooper ST's (rolls eyes), fleetguard oil filters, Delo 400 engine oil, Delo ESI gearbox oil and an RTC.
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

Auto by light years.
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 5:09 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by jessie928 »

fnqcairns wrote:A manual will behave as well as and better than an auto if one has taken the time to learn driving techniques like heel n toe. Two feet but three pedals ends up instinctively as if there is only two pedals but the car is controlled 3 ways, in the right hands the control can become finite almost.

A person actually has more control with this technique than in any auto as the cars becomes not just a go or slow affair but can be ridden entirely for the want of a better way to say it.
It's worth the possible burnt clutches and constant stalling to try and master it. I never mastered it but I learnt it years ago and it is fun. Tried to do it a couple of weeks ago on some rocky patches in the GQ - all I can say is the ability is easier to lose than learn.
But for the average person who will drive comp (or anything 4wd) with around the same skill set they learnt in the burbs an auto is probably the go.



cheers fnq
Dude, this is not a racetrack? heel and toe is worth jack all if you are climbing and crawling, or negotiating tight obstacles on a steep incline. because the more heel and toe you use to slip the clutch the more smoke will be bellowing out from your belbousing.

no matter how good you are at heel and toe in a 4wd, you need to slip the clutch, and slipping the clutch is BAD.


Jes
ATTACH BROKEN TOYOTA HERE--->
DUCATI <-----Worlds best warning label
Posts: 502
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:09 pm
Location: Cairns

Post by fnqcairns »

Nah it's a skill and you mentioned another application I can still do that OK-ish, a good analogy is trials bikes where those with the skill will chose a manual clutch and consider the centrifugal clutch bikes a bit of a joke.

Never learn it, never know, someone with the skill will not be much harder on the clutch, a learner will be until they know what they are doing.

As I more or less said above for those that use the same skill set parking in a tight spot at the shopping centre or going over speed bumps the auto is the way to go, this now includes me as I just don't have the interest to relearn the technique to the level needed.
The fact there is a clutch in the picture increases the cars ability way above an auto.....with the right driver and technique.

cheers fnq
*JUST LUV IT* 96 GQ LWB TD4.2, Cav, Kings, Dobinsons, Motorguard, Enginesaver, 400 pro, Cooper ST's (rolls eyes), fleetguard oil filters, Delo 400 engine oil, Delo ESI gearbox oil and an RTC.
Posts: 45681
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 10:13 am

Post by bogged »

fnqcairns wrote:The fact there is a clutch in the picture increases the cars ability way above an auto.....with the right driver and technique.

Image
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 5:09 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by jessie928 »

bogged, i cant beleive i am saying this but

" well put"


dude, have you ANY idea just exactly HOW LOW the gearing is a trials bike is?? if you did , you would not even begin to compare a featherweight bike to 2tonne 4WD's in similar terrain.


I call bullshit aswell :)


Jes
ATTACH BROKEN TOYOTA HERE--->
DUCATI <-----Worlds best warning label
Posts: 19062
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 11:39 pm
Location: In a horse near you

Post by chimpboy »

fnqcairns wrote:Nah it's a skill and you mentioned another application I can still do that OK-ish, a good analogy is trials bikes where those with the skill will chose a manual clutch and consider the centrifugal clutch bikes a bit of a joke.
That's really not the same thing.

The main reasons to go for a manual over an auto would be:

(a) better engine braking
(b) better fuel economy
(c) better gearing

But if you are installing dual transfer cases you will go a fair way towards dealing with (a) and (c), and (b) is a relatively minor issue in that you'll be chewing through lots of juice either way, most likely.

Then there's the disadvantage with a manual of losing all power during gear changes, which in some situations could be a big issue. Effectively with a manual in those situations you just have to stick to whatever gear you're in.

I say all this as someone who drives, and generally prefers, a manual transmission!

Jason
This is not legal advice.
Posts: 11892
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:53 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by N*A*M »

i heart manual. but auto seems to be the way these days.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 80 guests