Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
96 Pajero lift poll
Moderator: -Scott-
96 Pajero lift poll
My mate's got a 96 pajero and wants to lift it to fit 33" tyre's is it worth lifting the IFS up 2" and doing a body lift or should he rip the IFS out and put in a solid axle out of a 79 series cruuiser anybody ever don this before?
current truck, 105 series GXL diesel 6" springs & twin pro lockers
sierra LWB spoa one wide track diffs twin locked
Sierra Parts Wanted pm me
sierra LWB spoa one wide track diffs twin locked
Sierra Parts Wanted pm me
The SAS swap is a big job - I'll leave that to others to discuss.
If the Paj has a 3.0 then it will need a body lift to clear 33s. I think the 3.0 was dropped by '96, so it should have the 3.5 or 2.8, in which case you can fit some 33s with a simple suspension lift - although tyre width and rim selection makes a difference for clearance. The body already sits higher on the chassis than earlier models, so a body lift isn't required.
Cheers,
Scott
If the Paj has a 3.0 then it will need a body lift to clear 33s. I think the 3.0 was dropped by '96, so it should have the 3.5 or 2.8, in which case you can fit some 33s with a simple suspension lift - although tyre width and rim selection makes a difference for clearance. The body already sits higher on the chassis than earlier models, so a body lift isn't required.
Cheers,
Scott
paj
and then mines only got about a 1.5" lift and i run 33"s fine, i ran the 33" JT2s on the same setup, the front was maybe .5" higher with no winch and stuff and the rear was prob .5" higher as well cos springs hadnt sagged, but that still just a 2" suspension lift, and the 33" JT2s were waaaaaaay bigger than 33", but they still ran no worries, only time they ever hit was up at stockton when i was jumping the paj, and the fronts hit on the ARB bar, but never anywehre else, thats on 15x8 cruiser offset...
dean
dean
I believe by 96 even a 3.0L models had same 35mm body lift. It's absent only on early gen 2. After introduction of 3.0 24V all models had bodylift to accomodate larger transmission. Regardless I run 33" without a lift. Cranking tbars - is not a lift. Just merely increase in riding hight It's by no means eliminates possibility of rubbing.
92 Montero SR, 285/75R16(33-11.50/R16) Yokohama MT on 16X8 Eagle 149 alloys, brush guard, Rear ARB, GAST air compressor, AirLift 1000, OME. MileMarker 10500
2002 GL, 285/75R16 SuperSwamper TruXus MT
2002 GL, 285/75R16 SuperSwamper TruXus MT
paj
surely youve done something since the last time i spoke with you, you had the axle and youve got access to the workshop, how bout an update, and hekta, your as bad as each other, i saw hekta up at the maitland show and he said his paj was in the overkill workshop getting done, there must be some updates round somewhere, from either you or stu, might get everyone else motivated to do something i wont be cutting anything outta the front for problem 2 yrs as i wanna keep it for touring aus, but after the big trips done, project car here we come
now how bout some updates on the two SAS pajs we got going apparently
dean
now how bout some updates on the two SAS pajs we got going apparently
dean
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests