Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.
rhs v hollow bar
Moderators: toaddog, TWISTY, V8Patrol, Moderators
rhs v hollow bar
has anybody used a heavy wall rhs for an A frame or control arms?? just wondering cons n pro's (if any).
round tube is easy to use, a pain to chop off at angles when making up an A-frame or similar stuff. Hollow tube is fantastic in in-line forces, as in drive shafts or flagpoles for instance. Its no good for side impact forces. Have you ever stood ontop of a can of coke, balanced on one foot? It'll hold ur weight, but as soon as you touch the wall of the can, it'll collapse. Ask anybody with coils and trailing arms, once you ding a trailing arm, the torque forces on the axle will bend the arms even more.
Square or rectangular tube is slightly heavier, but will take in-line loads as well as round tube, AND will take side loads heaps better than tube. Have u ever tried to bend a square tube on its corners? It has effectively 2 walls to resist the forces. Much better for trailing arms, slider bars, etc.
Square or rectangular tube is slightly heavier, but will take in-line loads as well as round tube, AND will take side loads heaps better than tube. Have u ever tried to bend a square tube on its corners? It has effectively 2 walls to resist the forces. Much better for trailing arms, slider bars, etc.
03 V6 Xtra Cab Hilux F&R Lockers 4' BL/susp 33' BFG MTs sliders ARB bullbar IPFs-workn 4 SAS$$
rhs is probably only stronger due to the "ding factor" you mention (teknical term)V6XtraHilux wrote:round tube is easy to use, a pain to chop off at angles when making up an A-frame or similar stuff. Hollow tube is fantastic in in-line forces, as in drive shafts or flagpoles for instance. Its no good for side impact forces. Have you ever stood ontop of a can of coke, balanced on one foot? It'll hold ur weight, but as soon as you touch the wall of the can, it'll collapse. Ask anybody with coils and trailing arms, once you ding a trailing arm, the torque forces on the axle will bend the arms even more.
Square or rectangular tube is slightly heavier, but will take in-line loads as well as round tube, AND will take side loads heaps better than tube. Have u ever tried to bend a square tube on its corners? It has effectively 2 walls to resist the forces. Much better for trailing arms, slider bars, etc.
As someone else said, round tube is the same strength in all directions, RHS is not. With this fact in mind it is very easy to substitute the same wall thickness RHS for round tube (same weight? close?) if you know where the forces are coming from and orient the RHS the right way.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
