Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

Stock shock lengths on Gen2 - extension and compression

Tech Talk for Mitsubishi owners.

Moderator: -Scott-

Post Reply
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:16 am
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin USA

Stock shock lengths on Gen2 - extension and compression

Post by bretwalda »

Anyone have data on the compression and extension lengths of stock shocks on a Gen2? Is there a difference between the ECS and regular models lengths?

I'm highly interested in the Rancho9000's but I dont like the length data I'm seeing recommended for our application.

If anyone has any other options they know of...but I want the remote setup - in the cab feature and I think these are the only ones.
US 1995 Montero SR 3.5L DOHC
Posts: 365
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 1:38 pm
Location: Brisbane, Nthsider

Post by redrocket »

"If it ain't broken, smash it harder, then make it stronger!"
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:16 am
Location: Milwaukee Wisconsin USA

Post by bretwalda »

Thanks red. Ok I've looked over some of the older posts that have been popping up on this topic and one mystery still remains. It appears you're screwed no matter what with the front, no? If your completely stock and you get a longer shock you will bottom it out. If you're lifted (in my case, to the max including a balljoint flip and very small bumpstops) you will still bottom out on compression because while your longer shock will handle the the slight extension these mods give, compression (upward travel) is still the same.

Is my thinking correct on this? If I'm not :oops: Is there a definitive part # I should go with on the Rancho9000's for the front?
US 1995 Montero SR 3.5L DOHC
Posts: 365
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 1:38 pm
Location: Brisbane, Nthsider

Post by redrocket »

not all is lost for the front. i have a ball joint flip in the front and a spacer (12mm) and the pedders foam cell shocks in there atm have 10mm travel either way of full bump and full extension. i only know this from having them in the car and marking on the shaft then pulling them out and physically pulling the shaft in and out to its max and min lengths. just a matter of finding a shock.
"If it ain't broken, smash it harder, then make it stronger!"
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by Homer »

bretwalda
I have what may be standard specs from a monroe listing which is Front 227 Comp to 342 Ext and Rear 301 Comp to 486 Ext I have only concentrated on the rear so far because the KYB shocks on my rear (came with the car?) only measure 455 extended and from what I have seen 491mm is about the max off the shelf rear shock for the pajero however the F series ford rear shock has the same mounting type top and bottom and a 498mm extended length only 7mm but that equates to maybe another 15-20 at the wheel but I haven't tested at what point keeping the uncompressed spring in place will become an issue...Anyone?
Regards
Scott
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests