Notice: We request that you don't just set up a new account at this time if you are a previous user.
If you used to be one of our moderators, please feel free to reach out to Chris via the facebook Outerlimits4x4 group and he will get you set back up with access should he need you.
Recovery:If you cannot access your old email address and don't remember your password, please click here to log a change of email address so you can do a password reset.

buying a zook

Tech Talk for Suzuki owners.

Moderators: lay80n, sierrajim

Post Reply
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 8:55 pm
Location: eagleby

buying a zook

Post by cragal »

Can anyone tell me what the average price of a late 80's early 90's zook is, and is there any major point to look out for
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 9:39 pm
Location: brisbane

Post by borris »

depends on the year and the model as you have covered two types the narrow trak and wide trak models the prices change the 80s are narrow one ltr engine sierras and are cheaper the 90 are wide track ltr 1.3 5 speed
Posts: 11892
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 9:53 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by N*A*M »

buy a wide track model (1988.5 onwards)
price varies from $3k-$8k
condition can vary a lot and you mostly get what you pay for

i'm sure people here will be able to tell you what to look out for specifically
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 8:55 pm
Location: eagleby

Post by cragal »

thanks for your help
Posts: 666
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 6:56 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW

Post by camskizook »

look out for rust in the windscreen frame...it can get pretty tragic (like mine is)
CAM
Posts: 293
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 9:10 am

Post by skippy »

on teh topic of rust:
- door sills
- between the windshield and body where the antenna cable passes through
- under the rubber seal for the rear tailgate
- front body mounts
Skippy


--------------------------------------------------
for all things digital, come to NEWflavour
'a better tasting multimedia experience'

http://www.newflavour.com/
--------------------------------------------------
Posts: 314
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by purefmx »

b wilson wrote: the 80s are narrow one ltr engine sierras and are cheaper


??? I own an 85 Narrow Track and its a 1.3 5 speed, the wide track came in around 88 didnt it? And i thought they went 1.3 5spd in around late 84?
1985 LWB Suzuki Sierra, Lock-Rite Rear, SPOA, 2" Body Lift, Climax shackles, Rancho's,
Series 1 Rockhoppers, 31x11.5 MT'S, "To return from the dead very sooooon!"
[url]http://www.cyberdesigns.tk[/url]
[url]http://www.purefmx.tk[/url]
Posts: 2817
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 10:10 pm
Location: Hellbourne again

Post by bigsteve »

My 91 WT cost me 5k but if I did it again, I'd buy a late NT modem (1988) and offset the rims to WT specs

Steve
yeshemesh
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: Medowie, NSW

Post by redzook »

mine cost me 3k its an 88
Team UNDERDOG #233
WERock Australia thanks to
[url]http://www.longfieldsuperaxles.com[/url]
[url]http://www.rockbuggysupply.com[/url]
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 2:39 am
Location: Perth

Post by drifta »

bigsteve wrote:My 91 WT cost me 5k but if I did it again, I'd buy a late NT modem (1988) and offset the rims to WT specs

Steve


Steve, I have a NT, why would you buy a NT model and offset the rims to WT specs? what is involved with this.. just inserting spacers?

Cheers

Paul
Posts: 6229
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 10:37 am
Location: melbourne victoria australia

Post by christover1 »

Steve, I have a NT, why would you buy a NT model and offset the rims to WT specs? what is involved with this.. just inserting spacers?

Cheers

Paul[/quote]

I am not Steve, but, the springs are mounted further in on the Nt, thus if you space hubs, or offset the wheels, you get more travel. Also NT's are cheaper, so more money left for mods, etc. Wheel spacers aint legal in all places, but offsetting wheels is cheaper anyway, any good wheel works can do that for round $40 a wheel. In a nut shell, you finish up with stability of the WT, with better travel and less dollars spent. If ya have a 1.3, then adding the 1lite t-case gives 12% reduction. Cheaper than a rockhopper, christover
4WD SUZUKI CLUB VICTORIA
http://www.vic.suzuki4wd.com/forum/
Posts: 314
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 9:16 pm
Location: Newcastle

Post by purefmx »

christover1 wrote: 1lite t-case gives 12% reduction. Cheaper than a rockhopper, christover


I thought a series one rockhopper gave a 73% reduction in low, thats a hell of a difference to 12%
1985 LWB Suzuki Sierra, Lock-Rite Rear, SPOA, 2" Body Lift, Climax shackles, Rancho's,
Series 1 Rockhoppers, 31x11.5 MT'S, "To return from the dead very sooooon!"
[url]http://www.cyberdesigns.tk[/url]
[url]http://www.purefmx.tk[/url]
Posts: 2066
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 8:17 pm
Location: Gympie

Post by Rhett »

Put a 1 litre in my zook last weekend Every bit of that 12% is well worth it. 80$ commpared to $1000 is a bit more of a difference than 12 to 73 too.
Its a wheelbase thing
Posts: 6229
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2002 10:37 am
Location: melbourne victoria australia

Post by christover1 »

I thought a series one rockhopper gave a 73% reduction in low, thats a hell of a difference to 12%


yes, sure is, rockhopper is on my wish list, will happen, but 12% is worth it for now. Mine was a 1litre originally, with 1litre diffs, I added the 1.3 motor to the 1.0 drive-line, so I'm actually 15% lower than a standard 1.3.
I think the S1 hopper is 60% lower in low box from the 1litre t-case and 80%lower from the 1.3 case???? high range is the same for 1litre, and 12% lower from the 1.3. Not sure if thats correct? christover.
4WD SUZUKI CLUB VICTORIA
http://www.vic.suzuki4wd.com/forum/
Posts: 2817
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 10:10 pm
Location: Hellbourne again

Post by bigsteve »

drifta wrote:
bigsteve wrote:My 91 WT cost me 5k but if I did it again, I'd buy a late NT modem (1988) and offset the rims to WT specs

Steve


Steve, I have a NT, why would you buy a NT model and offset the rims to WT specs? what is involved with this.. just inserting spacers?

Cheers

Paul


Ahh yeah what Chis said, and you can get the centres cut out and re welded with more offset to a set of sunrasias for $40 per wheel.

The extra money for mods was my main reason for saying 1.3 NT.

Steve
yeshemesh
Posts: 110
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Daniel »

Gday all,

i heard the 1985 and up are the ones to look for, because 1985 and below had all 4 drum brakes which = shit
look for a 1985 up hope i was some help

Daniel
Posts: 6411
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 11:49 pm
Location: Brisbane Australia

Post by Beastmavster »

christover1 wrote:
I thought a series one rockhopper gave a 73% reduction in low, thats a hell of a difference to 12%


yes, sure is, rockhopper is on my wish list, will happen, but 12% is worth it for now. Mine was a 1litre originally, with 1litre diffs, I added the 1.3 motor to the 1.0 drive-line, so I'm actually 15% lower than a standard 1.3.
I think the S1 hopper is 60% lower in low box from the 1litre t-case and 80%lower from the 1.3 case???? high range is the same for 1litre, and 12% lower from the 1.3. Not sure if thats correct? christover.



Christover,
Do you know of anyone who's found a combo of gears or another source of gear for a "mini rockhopper" for the Vitara like what the 1.0 transfer case was for the 1.3?

Andrew
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests